Thanks for adding information about using convection. Given how many foodies have convection ovens, it's surprising how rarely recipe authors note where convection might help and provide some guidance about time and temperature.
Like @Peasy, I do not eat soy, any wheat other than Einkorn, canola oil, corn by-products, and beet by-products. I also avoid meat, dairy and fats. And fish. My diet is largely limited to Circus Peanuts, so tonight--and tomorrow's after-Halloween sales--are my opportunity to stock up for the year.
This is the difference between Kenji and me. He writes, "There are medicinal, almost minty flavors that people will pick up on—almost as if you've spiked your eggnog with an herbal liqueur, like Fernet-Branca." I would have said, "almost as if you've spiked your eggnog with Scope."
A serious question: if the reason for not using St. Louis-style rins is that they were too big to fit on a bun, why did you stay with baby-back ribs once you'd decided the ribs would be chopped up with the pork shoulder?
The Ribby McRibface certainly seems like the result of some honest-to-goodness smoking.
@geemus An Ikea pot lid holder is the gadget in the sous vide container.
@geemus This is what's in the bottom of the sous vide container: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TJTWR04/
Who among us does not wish to pull off his pork before bedtime?
You consider a dry martini to be a ratio of 2:1 gin to vermouth? That's already as wet as . . . well, it's a family website, so I'll stop there. You'd need a couple of those martinis just to make you tolerate the outrage.
I'm a fan of Kenji. I overlook his lamentable use of cliche as an adjective (in his roasted eggplant post today) and his occasional failure to attain subject-verb agreement ("the messiness of piled-on nachos are"). But today's dose of paternalistic authoritarianism is unforgivable. He writes of "a sensible number of chips." Thank you, Mother. I fear you lived under the spell of Mayor Bloomberg--he of the sensible size of soft drink--too long. Let us, the nacho-consuming public, decide for ourselves what is an appropriate number of nachos, and I venture to say the number we choose will not be what you consider sensible. And God help us if Serious Eats ever becomes Sensible Eats.
It's good to see Shun Lee Dynasty receive recognition for its contribution, something that has not always been the case in these pages.
If you're going to the considerable expense of sending bagels overnight from New York, why would you send only half a dozen?
Any attempt to be encyclopedic about what you can do with a jar of mayonnaise needs to include temporarily holding caught lightning bugs (after punching holes in the lid, of course; we are not savages).
Many people prefer bottoming. It's a valid choice.
I was at a wedding just the other day where they played Portobello's Canon.
For sure, $.25 per minute is a little expensive. At that rate, a feature movie would rent for $30. On the other hand, Internet porn costs more. So in order for the Food Lab episodes to be a value proposition, the imperative is obvious: naked presenters and some steamy in-the-kitchen action. Additional benefit: no need to worry about competition from Christopher Kimball--not that he wouldn't be willing to peel, just that nobody would pay to see it.
Whoever chose "Hot Dogs Here!" as the headline, directly after "The Food Lab Video Series is Here!," deserves an award. Hucksters here!
A couple of months ago you said the first two episodes would be free. The Vimeo page doesn't reflect that. Did plans change?
Not so sure about dripping warm chocolate into the churning ice cream. After all, a wise man has written that "ice cream doesn't like changes in temperature, and adding warm or room temperature nuts to freshly churned ice cream will melt pockets of the ice cream before the base can fully harden."
But perhaps more importantly, there's something very appealing about shards of chocolate in ice cream that don't melt too easily when eaten but instead provide a satisfying crack. Think about the coating on a Dove Bar or the chocolate in Ben & Jerry's Cherry Garcia (the ne plus ultra of supermarket pints). I melt chocolate, spread it on parchment in a not-too-thin layer, then break that up for inclusion in the ice cream. Pretty darned tasty.
God he'p me, I'd already forgotten half of what you wrote. And I can't remember which half. So now I have to figure out whether to hang onto the half I still have or to forget it all. Happily, tomorrow I won't even remember having had this problem.
This article, along with Kenji's write-up of the secret menu at In-N-Out, belongs in the Serious Eats Hall of Fame. Uber-Kenji! How I wish I could have seen young Kenji assessing the heat of the display cases at his local bagel shop, unaware that his path in life had already been set, no choice but to become a scientifically inclined food writer.
As for the inclusion of sesame seed, pumpernickel and cinnamon raisin on the list of acceptable bagel types, let's give Kenji the benefit of the doubt and praise him for open-mindedness and tolerance rather than condemn him for lowering the standard of an otherwise fine ranking.
I wonder if everyone shares the Overlord's preference for pancakes with crisp edges. I think of the ideal pancake being tender throughout. For crisp outsides and tender insides, I turn to waffles.
Though buckwheat pancakes would not be my choice for breakfast, let it be said that buckwheat blini make a pretty fine vehicle for caviar.
I do get that funders will receive the book before it's officially released. According to the indiegogo page, the expected delivery of the book to funders giving $100 and above is September. The book will be released on September 21 to the general public; its price on Amazon is $34.33. So you can get it on Amazon on September 21 for thirty-four bucks or via indiegogo perhaps one to three weeks earlier for a hundred bucks. Given that, I'd say the emphasis should be not on the exclusivity of the inducements but simply on the inclination of people to give you--somebody they've come to like and admire--a helping hand.
With the greatest respect, this seems a little odd: crowdfunding for a commercial project (i.e., intended to make a profit) that will take place regardless, and with the inducements offered to funders not goods at a preferred price but rather at a price far higher than they'll command in the marketplace when available to the public. So in essence it's a charitable contribution to a profit-making enterprise. But it's a free-will offering, and if people are inclined to pony up, that's certainly their prerogative. Operators are standing by.