Profile

linmn

Tipping per-item vs. bill percentage

There's been a decent backlash based on this fear that good service won't be rewarded, which I sympathize with. However, this is exactly why I also recommend leaving a percentage tip as well for the service. The difference is that this percentage tip is based on the per-item base tip, which to me makes sense. If I order a single extremely expensive dish for $100, that waiter should not be rewarded more than the waiter from whom I order 4 items totally $80. With 4 items, every part of the waiter's job scales up in difficulty. Thus, if you're concerned about making sure the expertise of waiters at Per Se is rewarded, simply increase the percentage on top of the base per-item tip to 100% or 200% or however much work you think the subjective quality of their work merits relative to their mostbasic duty of taking the orders, delivering them to the table, and taking them away.

Tipping per-item vs. bill percentage

@gutreactions: In practice, the per-item tip would bring down tips for the waitstaff at expensive restaurants, but I think that is an acceptable outcome. The physical demands of the job, viz. balancing plates, walking to and from the kitchen, walking to and from different tables, are all essentially the same no matter how fancy the restaurant is. The difference is in the mental faculties. How much expertise a waiter demonstrates regarding menu items, viz. ingredients, preparation, sourcing; how well they can remember orders; and how friendly they are toward patrons are all mental differentiators which are difficult to quantify. That's why I suggest adding additional tip based on a percentage of the per-item tip. This allows patrons to adequately address those special qualities.

@Meat guy: As for the significant tip reduction on expensive bills, this seems to me like a real, practical problem, but not one that is the responsibility of the patron. A waiter at Per Se who thinks they deserve a much larger tip than one at a local Applebee's, despite their performing no greater a task, is simply spoiled by the current unfair system. Granted, the reality is likely that the Per Se waiter will perform their duties with greater diligence, but that is where the percentage service addition plays its role. At Per Se, you might decide that their quality of service is worth 50% of the base per-item, or even more. The key is that you don't tip them more simply for the expensive meals you ordered, which they had little to no contribution or input into.

Lastly, I totally agree that there's nothing barring leaving a $10 tip on a $20 bill, but social pressures do not demand such behavior, which means that this rarely ever happens. Much more likely is that regardless of service, patrons leave ~$4 on a $20 bill. While we can say that there's always the option of leaving a exceptional tips, I want to focus on the general social norms of tipping and their general practical impact on dining experience.

Tipping per-item vs. bill percentage

I've recently been thinking about tipping and decided that tips calculated as a bill percentage don't make any sense to me. I always hear that tips are how waiters make money and that they make less than minimum wage hourly (although I believe employers are legally obligated to cover the difference if employees do not make the federal minimum wage including tips), so it seems like the restaurant industry itself is trying to cleave the waitstaff service from the food overhead. Why then are we still tipping based on menu prices? I wrote a lengthier, more in-depth explanation here, but I'll summarize the argument below.

Essentially, it seems to me that waiters should be tipped according to the quality of service they provide, and the price of the meal you order has nothing to do with their services. I think that a per-item tipping system makes more sense, as it takes into account the actual work of the waitstaff. Something around $1 an item, like at the bar. An additional percentage of the total per-item tip can be added to supplement for service quality. This way, waiters across all establishments are tipped more fairly for the quality and competency of their services rather than based on the arbitrary menu pricing of their establishment. This allows workers in lower income areas to still make a decent wage, as long as they make the effort to provide great service. As I see it now, too many cheap restaurants offer bad service because the waitstaff just doesn't care. They aren't motivated because they know the tips will never be great as long as they're menu-price based.

To me this seems like a much better system, but obviously I'm biased. I know it's not a perfect system, but I find it to be far better than our current social norm. I'd like to hear what you all think.

linmn hasn't favorited a post yet.