Serious Eats: bbqchef53's Profile

Serious Eater Profile

Get to Know a Serious Eater.

bbqchef53's Profile

Website:

Location:

About:

Favorite foods:

Last bite on earth:

The Ten Most Recent Comments By bbqchef53

Grilling Smackdown: Lump Charcoal vs. Briquettes

let's see, there are people who like briquettes casue they " don't burn as hot"... not quite sure what scientific evidence there is to that , but I do know that if an ember is coated with ash, the heat will be diminished, maybe that is why it "don't burn as hot"
... AND they, the briquettes, burn longer, another legend I'd like to se proven..

Facts are facts.. if you do any smoking that last more than a few hours, that briquette stuff will produce so much ash that the fire gets choked....

try smoking a brisket using them chemically pressed briquettes, and see how much ash is produced.. if you learned how to use lump charcoal, or all wood, you wouldnt have that problem

as well, some of the proponents of briquettes are grilling, not smoking... have it man, but once you've tried grilling with lump, you'll never go back

just my humble opinion

bbqchef53 at 7:56AM on 05/28/08

Responses to Comments by bbqchef53

From Serious Eats

Grilling Smackdown: Lump Charcoal vs. Briquettes

i've found with the lump that density of the chunck has a real effect on the speed at which the coals burn and being a natural product its impractical for them to produce a consistancy that the briquette has when it comes to density/burn time, i really love the flavor of the lump [ as long as its not cabinet shop scrap ( real trash ) ] but i really like the control i get useing briquettes, but the chemical flavor is terrible on the finished meat or whatever, a sure way to ruin a great ribeye or any other meat, veggie, fruit etc. so i'll look into the kroger, nature glo, wildfie,holland brands or any other natural briquettes, anyone know of sources for retail hands-on purchases. royal oak claims to be natural but i read a breakdown of ingredents and they included coal, anthricite, and the other usual suspects and to top it off royal oak claims it is necessary to put these ingredents in to manufacture a briquette and all mgf's use the additives. who do you believe NOT a salesman thats for sure do we have to analyse all brands or what

shipwreck at 4:00PM on 08/18/08

From Serious Eats

Grilling Smackdown: Lump Charcoal vs. Briquettes

There was a legendary post on the Big Green Egg forum years ago by Elder Ward (archived at http://www.nakedwhiz.com/elder.htm) in which Ward brilliantly explains how to achieve a long burning, low temperature fire using lump charcoal for a long, low smoke. He opens an entire bag of lump and sorts the coal by size. Clean all of the ash out of the bottom of your grill (especially important for the Big Green Egg where airflow can be controlled precisely if ash isn't clogging the airway). Place the largest pieces evenly in the bottom like a jigsaw puzzle. Use smaller pieces to fill in the gaps. Light with a little square of wax/sawdust firestarter. Following Ward's method in my Egg, I can keep a steady 200 degree fire going for twelve straight hours or longer. Because the fire can't be set off center, I use a ceramic deflector to create an indirect kind of heat.

Joel Silverman at 11:37AM on 08/05/08

From Serious Eats

Grilling Smackdown: Lump Charcoal vs. Briquettes

I use lump in my WSM using the Minion method, and never have to refill, even on long, 8+ hour pork butt cooks. One other benefit to using lump is, you can throw the ash right in the compost pile. You can't do that with briquette ash.

launate at 4:29PM on 07/31/08

From Serious Eats

Grilling Smackdown: Lump Charcoal vs. Briquettes

@bbqchef53: I have smoked a brisket using briquettes on more than one occasion. Turned out perfectly every time.

jb_dc at 7:03PM on 06/01/08

From Serious Eats

Grilling Smackdown: Lump Charcoal vs. Briquettes

Let me clear up one myth- lump does not burn hotter. Cooks Illustrated Magazine investigated this a few years ago and found that the temps of both were about the same. I think the idea that lump burns hotter comes from the fact that lump burns faster. I think it was a guesstimate that if it burns faster it must burn hotter. But, per Cooks Illustrated, this was not proven true.

All of that said, I prefer lump because it has a cleaner flavor. If you are cooking steaks or burgers it probably does not make a flavor difference. However, when I crank up my Weber for an overnight smoke of a pork butt, the difference is readily noticable. If I smoke for say 12 hours using Kingsford, the coal taste from the charcoal is easy to taste. The lump is a pure BBQ smoke flavor which I prefer.

Maybe Kroger brand charcoal contains no coal but I know that Kingsford does (see www.virtualweberbullet.com). To each his own. Some may like the coal flavoring. I know of a pizza restuarant in Florida that bakes its pizzas using a coal fired oven and the pizza crust does pick up the coal flavor. Hower for pork BBQ I don't want the coal flavor.

I think that the issue of lump burning faster can be an issue if you are open top grilling because the lump can burn out faster. That said, for smoking, I have never had a issue with lump or charcoal running for say 12 hours with only one reload.

Mr Magoo at 10:08PM on 05/30/08

From Serious Eats