annaandguy’s Profile

Recent Comments

From Serious Eats

Have Hardee's and Carl's Jr. Gone Too Far (Or Big)?

Hmmm, Carl's Jr. is still one of the last fast food places with a Low Carb Burger still on the menu (wrapped in lettuce, minus the bun).

While I think it's far better to find a grass fed burger than a factory-farmed fast food burger, when are people going to understand the basic biochemistry that makes a fast food meal a nutritional disaster? It is the bun, the ketchup, the fries, the fake "cheese", the soybean and HFCS sweetened mayo, and the HFCS-laced soda that are the most "artery-clogging", not the burger.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

What a bunch of nit-pickers. Get with the spirit of the rules. We could all pick them apart with picayune exceptions, myself included. But generally-speaking, even making an attempt to follow these rules will have people eating quite a bit better. Geeze.

From Serious Eats

To Eat or Not to Eat? That Is the Question

Oh, so many food, diet, and weight loss myths to bust!

A few years ago my husband and I both had some pounds to lose (20 for me and about 35 for him). We gained most of it when we ate pasta and homemade bread more frequently. Stupidly, I was trying to keep fat intake and meat on the low side then, too. I tried the gym (though I hate gym environments), got a bit fitter, but the weight didn't budge. I didn't feel like we ate too much, nor did we eat "bad food", so I was really unwilling to starve ourselves to lose weight. I mean, how does one live that way just to lose weight and then maintain the weight loss later? Reducing iets as a short term fix are doomed to fail.

Also, exercising just to lose weight works *up* an appetite. Maybe not immediately after working out, but long term, it does. Look at what lumberjacks can eat - 5000 calories or more a day without gaining. Same for military personel in the field carrying around many pounds of equipment. And for all the calories burned in a an exercise session, it is far less than people suppose (and they often make up for it later as a "reward"). Those few hundred calories burned are about equal to a few bites of something or a slice or two of bread. I'd rather not eat the bread and save gym grunting. I'm not saying all exercise is bad, but it isn't the best way to lose weight. Not by a long shot.

Increasing body fat is due to high insulin levels, which store excess fat and glucose calories. But eating fat without a lot of sugar and starch doesn't raise insulin levels but eating carbohydrates does. So if you are going to restrict any foods, restrict sugars and starches, no matter how "whole" and "healthy" you think they are or how nutritionally incorrect it seems. Human biochemistry cannot be ignored. Fat calories cannot be stored without high insulin levels. Without insulin, the body will burn off excess fat calories as heat, rather than storing them as body fat. You can eat more non-starchy vegetables if you are not eating sugar and starch.

So it is possible to lose weight without starving oneself, without forcing oneself to spend hours at a gym instead doing something more interesting, and without eating fake food. It just makes a lot more sense to cut back on (to whatever level is necessary to lose weight) sugar and starches, which make up a disproporationate % of modern diets and provide far less in the way of nutrients and structural building materials for the body. Early humans developed without much of these foods, so think of it as getting in touch with the inner hunter-gatherer. We've maintained our weight lose without much effort or sacrifice since 2004 and can't imagine eating any other way now. It's a healthier way of eating for life. In fact, this was exactly the way to eat prescribed to me in 1998 when I was pregnant and diagonoses with gestational diabetes. Every bite had to count. I only wish I had continued with it instead of going back to empty foods like bread and pasta.

See more comments by annaandguy ยป

Recent Posts

annaandguy hasn't written a post yet.

Recent Favorites

annaandguy hasn't favorited a post yet.

Recent Polls

annaandguy hasn't answered any polls yet.

Recent Quizzes

annaandguy hasn't taken any quizzes yet.

Recent Comments | Response to Comments

From Serious Eats

Have Hardee's and Carl's Jr. Gone Too Far (Or Big)?

Hmmm, Carl's Jr. is still one of the last fast food places with a Low Carb Burger still on the menu (wrapped in lettuce, minus the bun).

While I think it's far better to find a grass fed burger than a factory-farmed fast food burger, when are people going to understand the basic biochemistry that makes a fast food meal a nutritional disaster? It is the bun, the ketchup, the fries, the fake "cheese", the soybean and HFCS sweetened mayo, and the HFCS-laced soda that are the most "artery-clogging", not the burger.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

What a bunch of nit-pickers. Get with the spirit of the rules. We could all pick them apart with picayune exceptions, myself included. But generally-speaking, even making an attempt to follow these rules will have people eating quite a bit better. Geeze.

From Serious Eats

To Eat or Not to Eat? That Is the Question

Oh, so many food, diet, and weight loss myths to bust!

A few years ago my husband and I both had some pounds to lose (20 for me and about 35 for him). We gained most of it when we ate pasta and homemade bread more frequently. Stupidly, I was trying to keep fat intake and meat on the low side then, too. I tried the gym (though I hate gym environments), got a bit fitter, but the weight didn't budge. I didn't feel like we ate too much, nor did we eat "bad food", so I was really unwilling to starve ourselves to lose weight. I mean, how does one live that way just to lose weight and then maintain the weight loss later? Reducing iets as a short term fix are doomed to fail.

Also, exercising just to lose weight works *up* an appetite. Maybe not immediately after working out, but long term, it does. Look at what lumberjacks can eat - 5000 calories or more a day without gaining. Same for military personel in the field carrying around many pounds of equipment. And for all the calories burned in a an exercise session, it is far less than people suppose (and they often make up for it later as a "reward"). Those few hundred calories burned are about equal to a few bites of something or a slice or two of bread. I'd rather not eat the bread and save gym grunting. I'm not saying all exercise is bad, but it isn't the best way to lose weight. Not by a long shot.

Increasing body fat is due to high insulin levels, which store excess fat and glucose calories. But eating fat without a lot of sugar and starch doesn't raise insulin levels but eating carbohydrates does. So if you are going to restrict any foods, restrict sugars and starches, no matter how "whole" and "healthy" you think they are or how nutritionally incorrect it seems. Human biochemistry cannot be ignored. Fat calories cannot be stored without high insulin levels. Without insulin, the body will burn off excess fat calories as heat, rather than storing them as body fat. You can eat more non-starchy vegetables if you are not eating sugar and starch.

So it is possible to lose weight without starving oneself, without forcing oneself to spend hours at a gym instead doing something more interesting, and without eating fake food. It just makes a lot more sense to cut back on (to whatever level is necessary to lose weight) sugar and starches, which make up a disproporationate % of modern diets and provide far less in the way of nutrients and structural building materials for the body. Early humans developed without much of these foods, so think of it as getting in touch with the inner hunter-gatherer. We've maintained our weight lose without much effort or sacrifice since 2004 and can't imagine eating any other way now. It's a healthier way of eating for life. In fact, this was exactly the way to eat prescribed to me in 1998 when I was pregnant and diagonoses with gestational diabetes. Every bite had to count. I only wish I had continued with it instead of going back to empty foods like bread and pasta.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

Great post, so nice to see all of the rules lined up in a row, on one easy to digest (and print) page. Thanks!

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

4. "Avoid food products that carry health claims."

Wouldn't sushi and the raw bar be included in this?

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

Fillipelli suggests:

grants to CSAs and farm markets so they can more readily accept food stamps or have reduced prices for those of limited means.

I live in Willits, CA, where the farmer's market already accepts food stamps. Vegetables average $2-3/pound, though. With the rise in food prices over the past few years, that's only a little worse than the local chain stores, and an actual bargain when it comes to beets and leeks.

A local organization, WELL (Willits Economic Localization: http://www.willitseconomiclocalization.org) is going to start a second farmer's market this spring, which will also accept food stamps and feature lower prices.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

I've read all of Michael Pollan's book and this is considered more guideline than commandments. The first one is just the first general step. He's referring to, say, Go-Gurt. She wouldn't know what to do with it - brush her teeth? As for eating healthy - I'm a busy college student but I make it a conscious decision to eat right since I've done enough reading to know that poor diet high in animal-based proteins and fats is what is driving the obesity, heart disease, diabetes and even cancer in our country. Don't eat organic - it is often shipped from very far away so it's not always that good for you since it's not fresh and has a high carbon footprint due to transportation. I go to the grocery store twice a week and spend about $30 ($60/wk) on fruits and vegetables and seeds/nuts mostly. It would be convenient for me to just eat at fast food restaurants and get my quick heavy fix of calories, but if i ate twice a day at Taco John's, McDonalds, Burger King, etc.. it would cost me about ten dollars a day ($70/wk). Or even eating on campus costs about $50-60 so it's looks like it's better to just make my own food at home. And it's MUCH cheaper to make your OWN pizzas instead of ordering them out all the time. It's just less convenient. I actually love the time I spend making my food... cutting the vegetables. It creates so much anticipation for what you're about to eat you're about to explode by the time you finally get to eat it.

The problem with corn-fed beef is that the cattle are literally sick when slaughtered. A grass fed cow reaches slaughter weight around 4 years (~48 months), but a corn fed cow is grass fed for 6 months and then sent to a feedlot where they are fed a corn/grain based diet until slaughtered at 14-16 months (about 8 months to reach 48 month equivalent). The grain, that their digestive tracks aren't meant to digest, can make them very sick. The biggest health problem seen on feedlots is bloat from all the grain that they're systems just can't properly break down which creates large amounts of gas (leading to methane that gets in the air). Because the corn makes them so sick, they are injected with antibiotics (which you then eat). Your food is only as good as what your food ate. Of course the beef tastes different - corn is the basis of almost our whole diets by sweetening up this or that or making foods more appealing. But the meat tastes so empty compared to properly prepared grass-fed beef. It's not really the humanity of these operations that keeps me from eating beef, it's knowing that the food I'm eating would have died within a few months after if not slaughtered at 14 months from health complications due to force fed corn.

You find once you care about what you eat and where it's coming from, all of these guidelines are pretty much common sense and come pretty easy to follow. Most of the rest of the world consider food always near the top of the priority list - and they don't have the rates of disease as we see in this country. Wonder why?

From Serious Eats

Have Hardee's and Carl's Jr. Gone Too Far (Or Big)?

I'd like all of my burger consumption to be accompanied by hot dogs.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

I am SO tired of hearing people complain that eating healthy is expensive. Eating ORGANIC is expensive, but buying and eating lots of fresh produce and cooking at home is much cheaper and better for you than processed, fat&sodium laden crap that is turning the poor/middle class fat. Fast food is a convenience - if you take a *little* time to cook real food, you'll find that it doesn't break the bank and will do wonders for your health. Yes, this can be difficult for those working two jobs or just otherwise stretched to the max, but there are PLENTY of people who aren't so overburedened that they can't cook a simple meal.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

I'd like to argue that cows that are grass-fed, grass-finished, as just as good tasting as corn finished. It's also better for the cows, because feeding them grain, such as corn, is stressful to their systems - it also diminishes the omega-3 content they gain while eating grass.

I've found a good brand recommended by Eating Well magazine, called La Cense Beef. They recently sent out an email to their customers letting them know about a giveaway their doing I thought I'd share the site:

www.winagrassfedcow.com

From Serious Eats

Have Hardee's and Carl's Jr. Gone Too Far (Or Big)?

sorry but if people want it let them have it! Personally I stay away from fast food, and even when SO and I were struggling financially, there were cheaper and better options available, including ramen noodles. Yes there is still personal responsibility, although the unethical lawyers of the world shudder at the thought.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

He actually said "great-grandmother," not grandmother. And he doesn't mean to exclude things like sushi--it's made of fish and rice, which is obviously food. What isn't "food" are basically the items referred to in #2--things that aren't whole foods.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

CVilleBilly, low income families tend to gain weight because the affordable foods are calorie-dense and nutritionally-empty. Please read more on this issue before making such insulting remarks. Thanks.

I'm all for grassfed, no CAFO meats. If you have had pastured chicken and turkey, naturally-raised pork and really cooked the right way with grassfed beef, you know what I mean. It tastes meatier. You want fat with your steak? Top it with some bleu cheese. If you ever read how commercial meats are raised (Fast Food Nation) or themeatrix.com, you'll understand.

From Serious Eats

Michael Pollan's Twelve Commandments for Serious Eaters: Can You Live By Them?

Okay, as a general guideline I like the rules. I think that they would be very difficult to adhere to all the time, and perfectly, as they are written, but they're generally decent rules. There is one exception, and it's as much about the other comments as the rules. Everyone is very keen to help "The Poor" eat healthier - get more fresh foods, less processed foods, etc. In principle, I'm bang alongside that. In practice, that won't necessarily help. Having a refrigerator stocked to the brim, for free, with good things won't be all that useful to a lot of the working poor. If you're working two jobs, trying to get your kids to and from school, possibly caring for a sick relative, etc, food is just going to slip to the bottom of the priority list. (I have a very good friend going through all that right now). You're going to pick up convenience foods that probably taste like feet, but fill you up and get you out the door quickly. Given that there will always be a certain segment of the population that is dependent on convenience foods, perhaps there needs to be more focus on making those foods less harmful than on eliminating them from use.

Recent Posts

annaandguy hasn't written a post yet.

Recent Favorites

annaandguy hasn't favorited a post yet.

Polls

annaandguy hasn't answered any polls yet.

Quizzes

annaandguy hasn't taken any quizzes yet.

About annaandguy

Website:

Location:

About:

Favorite foods:

Last bite on earth: