ajbetz’s Profile
Recent Comments
Study finds: Organic food is no healthier than conventional
@dbcurrie: I think they meant processed as in containing synthetic ingredients ... there are lots of packaged items in the grocery store (tv dinners, cereal, cheeses, yogurts, crackers, etc.) that are labeled organic, but you have to give the makers of these things credit: take a look at their ingredient list, and you will not find things like HFCS, Caramel Coloring, Red 40, or any other mysterious chemical (At least on the things I've seen ... I know HFCS and many other things are derived from corn, and as far as I know, that is their primary ingredient .... does anyone know if HFCS counts as organic if its made from organic corn?) Not to say that HFCS is bad in and of itself .... that's a whole different can of worms!
@Sienna: So true ... Living around the edge of the Portland area where city meets farm, I happen to know several farmers and growers. The added weight of having to carry the 'organic' label comes with a hefty price, and some just don't do it because of the added costs and governmental intrusion, even though their food is 'un-officially' grown organically.
In this sense, I must agree with you ... there is a large marketing factor involved in buying 'organic', which is why I say organic is becoming a 'brand' more than anything. When you buy something labeled organic, you can be guaranteed that it meets the necessary requirements of the organic brand - Just as when you buy a Pepsi or a Coke product, you can rest assured that it is going to be just as good as every other Pepsi or Coke, and always will be. This makes the organic brand a 'safe choice' for those interested in buying only organic, and large companies have become very efficient at getting people hooked on brands. But who is to say that non-organic produce could be just as good as organic, even if it doesn't carry that label? As a self-described organic buyer, I have to thank you for reminding me of this point.
I think the best solution is for consumers to know as much as possible about where their food comes from. Its been kicked around a few times in govt. about adding labels indicating where a particular cut of meat or bushel of apples comes from right on the packaging. Produce already does this ... doing this for meat would just make as much logical sense as well. Those people that really care about where their meat comes from can choose one that comes from a farm they like ... these people can research that farm, find out how they raise the animals, ask the farmer questions about their methods ... And those that don't care ... well, then the extra information won't mean much, but at least it will be there. Anything that gives the consumer additional information about origin of production would give consumers more confidence (if they so choose to use the added knowledge) about buying their food ... 'organic'-label or not.
Study finds: Organic food is no healthier than conventional
Read it ... a fantastic book, and I often recommend it to all of my friends!
It sounds like you missed my point ... my point was that large organic farms are a step in the right direction, as compared to large industrial farms, even though these large industrial-organic farms (I used Earthbound and Stony Field Farms as examples) have somewhat hijacked the organic label. Cal-Organic, California's (Nay, the world's) largest organic producer, provides a staggering amount of the organic produce in the US ... I don't have the actual percentage, but its a large number. These growers, even if they do produce food that is USDA certified organic, still use industrial methods ... and because of that, the food they use is still prone to wide-scale contamination and disease outbreak. Not to mention that these same industrial-organic farms ship all across the US, not to mention some parts of the world. This is not a sustainable business model, and sustainability is also a big part of the organic movement. Like I said earlier, not all organic is equal ... there seems to be a difference in organic as it applies to fresh, local produce or meat versus organic as it applies to, for example, organic apples from Australia. Wouldn't you rather have one from here?
Now the real question is whether or not I would rather have an organic apple from Australia versus one from my neighbour's yard ... Lucky for me, I live in Oregon, where we grow all of our organic apples locally. And, fortunately for me, my neighbour's yard already is pesticide free, so I would gladly enjoy one of their organic apples as well!
Should Junk Food Help Pay for Health Care?
I agree with 99% of the posts here: taxing BMI is stupid. Even the analogy the poster from the Economist is bad: products are bad, so we tax the product. The poster mistakenly tries to apply this same logic to BMI, not realizing that BMI is not a product one can buy, but a result of a product.
a junk food tax is interesting, although I think would be too hard to pin down on semantic definitions. I think we all here might agree that soda is pretty much empty calories and should be taxed as junk food, but I'll bet Coke would disagree. They might even point at their competitors products ... "Why aren't Lay's Potato Chips being taxed as junk food? They are worse for you!" (Lay's is partnered with Pepsi) ... and the potato chip makers might point at the candy makers, who might point at the donut makers, who cry fowl at the cake and pastry makers ... imagine the carnage of a hundred bakers holding hands as they march on congress, throwing eggs in protest (The police, when they show up to break up fights, promptly ruin the eggs by pouring ketchup on them ...).
Needless to say, the whole situation gets out of hand, and is a little crazy.
It sounds like congress is trying to squeeze a little cash from overweight people. A better idea:
Regulate the price of gasoline and raise it to $8 / Gallon.
People would seriously re-consider their modes of transportation and getting around. More people would walk and bike to work and to the store, turning them into healthier people. In addition, as demand for oil drops, we would greatly reduce the amount of foreign oil we import, dropping our national debt; and we would greatly reduce the amount of green-house gases cars emit in the air.
Three national problems - obesity, economic debt, and the environment - solved with one little solution.
You're welcome :D
(This post brought to you by the makers of humor and sarcasm)
See more comments by ajbetz »
Recent Posts
See more posts by ajbetz »
Recent Favorites
See more favorites by ajbetz »
Recent Polls
ajbetz hasn't answered any polls yet.
Recent Quizzes
ajbetz hasn't taken any quizzes yet.

Waffle house and Brewpub ... two of my favorite things: waffles and beer!