• Share:
  • Send to Reddit
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Julia Child's House

Does this article upset anyone else but me?

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/08/31/new_occupants_get_cooking_in_julia_childs_former_house/?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed2

10 Comments:

No more than any other house with non-cooking or vegan inhabitants. At the end of the day it's just a house. I don't feel badly that no one is currently writing excellent satire in Mark Twain's old house. Besides in the article the current owner said she was inspired to do more cooking.

The only thing that bothered me was when she said she had no idea who Julia was before buying the house. I mean okay you don't like to cook but what crazy underground compound have you been living in since the 60's?

Actually it was the teenage daughter who said she'd never heard of Julia. That's not quite as bad.

If you actually want to see Julia's kitchen visit her wonderful exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History, part of the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C. They brought her entire original kitchen there gadget by gadget and it is a real charmer...along with the other memorabilia and videos surrounding her life.
When we visited 'foodies' of every age were gathered to pay homage...
I believe they filmed the final scenes of the 'Julie/Julia' movie there.

@ emilydev - Okay then, I agree not nearly as bad!

Oh, that's just WRONG on so many levels. It's like someone moving into Frank Lloyd Wright's house and deciding to furnish it with Star Trek furniture. I'm sorry a real foodie (in the spirit of what Julia Child held dear) couldn't have purchased the house.

A real foodie probably wouldn't be allowed to buy a house in Cambridge, all that butter, beef, eggs, etc.

i was even more disturbed by the link to an article about the headmaster of a local prep school doing away with all of the books in the school's library, calling them outdated technology.

It's too bad the local historical society didn't purchase the home for an historic site for tourists. It's sad someone moved in and didn't embrace the value and preserve the home as best they could instead of ripping it apart. I realize the kitchen was gone, but it could have been replaced with similar components and slide-in modern appliances.

Agree with you lurah...the historical value alone would have made it an ongoing attraction for the culinary world for years to come. What is it with these Cambridge people?

Did you catch the reference in the article that maybe everyone in Cambridge perhaps vegetarian or very health conscious? Too bad for a grand old home to have such a death as this.

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.

Start Talking!

Need a question answered? Have advice to share? Start a Talk topic now!

Sign up to start a talk topic

Sign up to get your questions answered and share advice.