Cookbooks: Then and now

Because I'm a single, novice cook I usually cook from recipes from 'this decade' given that they're the best adapted to my circumstances/ingredients/nutritional needs.

But given my love of literature, I adore reading vintage cookbooks, and always have my lit critic's 'hat' on when I'm perusing them.

I love observing how 19th century cookbooks:
-have few very specific directions because they assume people know how to cook
-provide instructions about creating zillion-course dinner parties with huge amounts made to feed much larger households
-the very rich foods during a time when people burned more calories
-insanely long vegetable cooking times
-menus for the sick, in an era where often people convalesced at home not in hospitals
-the assumption in many cookbooks that people had servants
-and the different cooking methods (like over open flames) and ingredients we don't use regularly now, like turtle, pheasant and so forth

With 1950s cookbooks
-the unselfconscious use of politically incorrect 'ethnic' terms like 'Chicken Hawaiian' and 'Oriental Beef'
-the assumption the reader was female
-a refreshing lack of concern for childhood calories--lots of rich 'afterschool' treats
-less processed foods, but when they are used, no apologetic attitude about using them
-great kitschy names and food art, like hamburger buns with olives for eyes and ketchup for a smile
-often smaller meat portions
-more things 'done' to vegetables with sauces
-lots of references to food that will 'please your man' in some cookbooks ;)

So, for those of you more experienced cooks that have used cookbooks spanning generations--how are cookbooks from various era of history different than cookbooks today?

Serious Eats Newsletters

Keep up with our latest recipes, tips, techniques and where to eat!


Comments are closed

Talk is closed - check out our Facebook and Twitter accounts instead.