• Share:
  • Send to Reddit
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Serious Eats? Really?

Will we have serious food topics on this site sometime soon?

Not like "will Ed lose weight?", or "do you like sugar in your coffee", or "spatula, yes or no?" or "where to get the best jicama fondue in Tribecca?" (I made up a couple of these: you guess which ones).

Some of us don't live in the US (notice I didn't say "America", which is a much bigger place"). Most of the pieces here assume "US" (if not New York), as if the rest of the world did not exist.

It's all well and good to talk about fake cupcakes, Paula Deen commercials, pizza joints opening in the deep south, or several years old "Good Eats" episodes, but these topics are hardly about "serious eats".

I try to refrain from commenting on this site, because I'm a bitter old man, but this is getting ridiculous. I checked, and want to let you know that "sillyeats" is not yet taken.

115 Comments:

Sounds like you don't like this site. Sorry it doesn't live up to your expectations of the name. Go somewhere else.

Not speaking for anyone else, but I find pizza and Paula Deen to be extremely serious topics.

The website is a nice diversion from the real "serious" issues we all confront these days. It's nice to have a little break from the economy, wars, politics, etc......

Would you like some bread baked in a flower pot?

It's not meant to be serious in the serious sense of the word. It's for people who are "Serious" about talking about ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to do with eating, food, baking, cooking, and anything mildly food/restaurant related. I'm always taken aback by posts or comments like this. Why bother harshing everyone's vibe, man? If you aren't happy with it, there are only about 6 billion other websites you can go to.

Maybe you could try elitist.com (0=

Or you could start your own site.

Didn't we just go through all of this recently? I thought that we had settled things on that. To each their own. The best part about this site is that it is both serious and not serious at the same time. There are so many sites out there, that one can surely find something that is more to one's liking, if this particular site does not suffice one's needs. I for one not only have a great time starting and responding to strings, but I also sometimes learn a lot. One site can be both, and this one is.

Ah sounds like my kind of disgrutled person. We agree to disagree here or we go to facebook and share our pain.
Try and not worry so much, unless it is about thawed CORN.
Pardon me. Just remember, Whatever you do, don't compromise the texture. I really needed that!

Pray tell, what would be an example of a "proper" serious topic? (Let's have some real fun, now.)

Actually, I would love to see some bread baked in a flower pot. It sounds like a great idea.

I don't want to harsh anyone's vibe; just as I can go to other web sites (and pardon me, but I doubt that there are 6 billion), you can also ignore my post. Can't I read this site and not be happy with it?

@Embackus: "Go somewhere else" sounds like a command. Do you have any right to be that stupid or arrogant? I think not. I live in a democracy, and I'm guessing you do as well.

Elitist? Far from it. I'm an old school, slow food kind of guy. I live in a small town in a poor country.

I'm surprised at the immediate and negative response to my post. Is it wrong to be critical? I didn't say "death to Serious Eats", I just asked some questions. If I didn't like Serious Eats, I wouldn't read it.

Adam, by the way, is my hero.

"If I didn't like Serious Eats, I wouldn't read it."
Now I am confused. What's the problem?

@Don Luis -- I love and read everything on the site, therefore I read the good, the bad, and the ugly. I am just surprised at the bad and the ugly sometimes, when it seems unwarranted.

And for the record: number of web sites on the net.

Now, who wants to talk about something silly?

I think Serious Eats could be more than what it is. Why is that a problem?

In any community, online or physical, there will be participants of varying levels of expertise or...seriousness, if you will. No matter what your skill level or mood I've found that there's something for everyone at SE.

There are times I enjoy reading about the preferred flavor of ice cream sundae and times I need to know why some cake recipes tunnel and others don't.

Lighter topics make for fun discussion (and even some discovery where SEers' tastes are concerned). I think the culinary fluff that sometimes happens actually makes us well-rounded. We can't always be oh so serious. As long as it's food conversation, it's all right with me.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. The Serious Eats logo includes what I consider to be a big smile. I think the term serious is referring to intense or concentrated food talk rather than pretentiousness.

@Don Luis: this site is populated by a large number of groupthink mentality afflicted housewives who are made very uncomfortable by any kind of critical tone. It's the American way, Walt Disney said it best with Thumper's mantra of "if you don't have something nice to say don't say anything at all." This of course has led to generations of self entitled brats who were coddled by their moms and were raised to believe that their shit doesn't stink. Anywhoo, I agree with you that 90% of the stuff on this site is junior varsity level, but Adam, Robyn, Ed and the rest of the gang are awesome, and the only thing to do is, as suggested above, ignore what doesn't suit you and participate in what does.

@juliebugsmama: that site says that there are 71 million (I rounded up) web sites. Food sites account for far less than 1% (unless I'm doing the math wrong). That means that there are only 700,000 food web sites. I've only looked at a few dozen.

I'm always up to talk about something silly. I like your attitude. Good, bad. or ugly, it's all worth reading.

It is slightly disturbing how willingly we may rush to stomp somebody who may gasp! express an unpopular opinion. One can actually criticise something because he/she wants to see it become better. Granted, "better" is in the eye of the beholder, but why is it a bad thing? "If you don't like it, go away" sounds very much like "you're either with us, or against us". Seriously?

@simon ~ You are SO HOT when you talk like that. I want more!!

@Don Luis - Be the change you'd like to see.

@Simon: Please do not take this or any conversation to a personal level. At least Don Luis was critiquing the threads on the site and not the people on it. That seems to me to be deeply uncalled for.

And for the record, I am not a housewife. I studied for a PhD in Archaeology, and will coon complete my Master's in International Business with a focus upon marketing research. I travel frequently and have a lot of cooking, baking and world experience from which to speak. but sometimes, I just like to relax by coming here. By making personal attacks on people or the general population of this or any site, you are creating a very hostile environment, which is conducive neither to relaxation nor positive critiques that may lead to improvments, if that was Don Luis' intention (needed or not). Please leave personal attacks at the door.

@Don Luis - I'm curious; what direction would you like Serious Eats to take, specifically? What kind of topics?

In my experience, the website has thus far two thing accomplished two things for me: (1) I am slowly but surely learning how to cook. Not cook well, Don Luis, but how to actually serve edible things. For instance, I recently learned just how to make an omelet. This might be a small thing for some, but that it actually stayed together AND tasted food was an amazing feeling.

(2) A sense of community. Sure, I like knowing that there are other people out there who enjoy food, but the range of topics, from regional cooking to legislation in the U.S. to the S....L....O....W food movement, is all very interesting. Plus people on here are very nice and funny and were quite understanding in a recent post of mine when I confessed I served "turkey on a stick" for Thanksgiving recently. I got some great tips!

BTW, I live in NYC, but grew up in Mexico, and get the whole "there are two Americas" idea that you are trying to point out, and believe me, people here are intelligent enough to see that! I think many though like myself see this site as a pleasurable escape where we can get away. At least that it's what it is for me. I'm a writer and have a book deadline; it's on the Middle East. It's very depressing. This makes me smile (;

@Don Luis -- I think you may have missed this part of the site:

Web pages in the world, February 2007: multiplying our estimate of the number of web pages per website by Netcraft's February 2007 count of websites, we arrive at 29.7 billion pages on the World Wide Web as of February 2007.

But, WHATEVER, that is so not the point.

You are, of course, entitled to your opinion, and entitled to express it. Just as we are entitled to like or dislike it, read or not read it, comment or not comment about it. If you are man enough to express your opinion in such a public way, then I am sure you are man enough to expect the reactions, however varied they may be -- good, bad, ugly.


@Traveller ~ You are WAY overreacting! simon has been posting out here for quite some time, and in case you missed many of his earlier posts, he is fabulous, witty and sarcastic. Can't you see that?

Actually, Don Luis, I live in a democracy too, which means I have the right to free speech and I can tell you to go somewhere else if I want to. There is no logic in telling me that it makes me stupid, and as far as arrogance goes, it makes me no less arrogant than you.
It's fine to express an unpopular opinion, but don't expect a positive response when you put out nothing but negativity. Making some positive suggestions or posting an intelligent and serious thread once in a while might actually achieve your goal of making the site more to your tastes.

@ Simon - I'm a jerk, but you're a real jerk and I love it!

I'd just like to point out that the Internet and user contributed content based sites (like this one) are generally going to have more fluff, idiotic commentary, and objectionable topics that aren't worth your time, more so than, say, the New York Times or The Wall Street Journal. The reason is due to the anonymity and lack of editorial oversight on these message boards. Everyone knows not to believe everything you see on TV. Similarly, the internet is full of lies, garbage, idiocy, conspiracy theories and also a lot of great stuff. This website is for fun and for gaining some knowledge and it is neither an encyclopedia, publicly traded company, nor college classroom. That means that people are free to post silly comments without having to own up to editors, shareholders, or professors and others are free to comment or to not read them. You are free to post more serious topics if you feel this site needs them (actions speak louder than words). As to the comment that this site is U.S.-centric, yes, it is. I believe most, if not all of the contributing writers on this site live in the U.S. If you think that the web deserves a site devoted to exploring other places in the world, then you should seek to organize that effort or use your bitter energy to write some articles for Serious Eats and perhaps they may even publish them.

I love throwing out broad generalizations, it usually gets the conversation fired up.

can't we all just get along?

@don luis - thank you for being comfortable enough to share your thoughts with the site.... sometimes things get a little fluffy, but then again sometimes it's a break from the cruel world..... i've learned a lot from people here and hope i've added some things as well.

in any relationship - there are good things and eh-things....

@juliebugsmama: yes, I am man enough to expect and accept the reactions to my posts. I would not post otherwise. How did you know that I'm a man?

I respect your opinion.

you guys are so silly. hehehe.

I must say, I've enjoyed the reactions to my post, from the "get out" to the "lighten up", it's all good. Makes me think.

Why so "serious"!?
(0=

I think the name Don Luis kinda gives it away.

@simon: may I ask what that means?

I think she knew you were a man cause you said that you are a "bitter old man" (0;

Wasn't this why the "serious efforts" topic heading was created?

In all reality, this is a public forum. With this, as with almost everything else in life, no one is going to be happy 100% of the time. There's room for fun topics such as "way or no way: ketchup on hash browns,"* just as there is room for the more "serious" topics. The best thing to do is just skip past the ones you don't want to see.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, of course, whether it is cheering 100% for the site or being critical. But if you are going post something such as this, that is somewhat hypercritical of the site (and, by extension, the people who post on it), perhaps it might be better received if you provided some solutions to the problem, instead of just being negative.

*not an attack on the way or no ways, I like them - I am just using it as a recent example of a topic that isn't particularly "serious"

well, Don Luis is a male name. Luisa is female, no? And isn't Don also a male thing in Spanish? If you were a woman, you would be Doña Luisa right?

Anyway, back on the subject, if you want a really serious food site, you should be reading eGullet. This site is about entertainment. eGullet is about serious food.

@Don Luis: Personally, I look down on you because you spelled "Tribeca" wrong. But that's just me. I'm sure everyone has his or her own reason to think you're an idiot.

@DonLuis, back on August 20th you implied you wanted a way to cancel your account even though you supposedly didn't want to. Change your mind yet? ;-) Honestly, if you don't like it, and obviously others do, you don't have to be here. You can rather obviously go somewhere you like, and not be a complainer there. Have at it!

I try to refrain from commenting on this site, because I'm a bitter old man, but this is getting ridiculous.

I think you should go back to refraining.

I always thought of serious in the context of this site as in, "That's one serious burger" not as in "This is a serious situation."

Jeez, how many parades have you pissed on today? Isn't you post rather like complaining that Larry the Cable Guy's form of humor is too low brow? The nature of this site is the nature of this site and many people enjoy it, why comment simply to raise defenses. I think your criticism cut very close to the bone and was interpreted as you attacking this community for not living up to your standards. This site obviously attempts to accomodate and welcome all members regardless of their cooking or culinary level, which is something I really enjoy. I think members should be made to feel welcome to post a topic that may not be about advanced skills, or recipes or technique without worrying that they are not living up to some sort of pre-identified standard. As other have written, there are plenty of other sites out there with lofty standards. It would be equally unfair of one of us to go onto one of those sites and complain that the community was too advanced for us.

Serious? I am a househusband who enjoys drinking a glass of wine or seven and getting down to some serious reading on this site, such as which foodstuffs will make my wife wanna have nookie. Trust me you can't get much more serious than that. In fact these facts may save a marriage, lead to more procreation, possibly even spawn the future leader of the free world all because I read to put oysters on a pizza! How dare you say this isn't serious!

i'm still aching to know what sort of topics you want to see. i'm sure there are plenty of other people on this site that might be interested, too.
i love the crew, but the comments can be a bit tiresome, as simon pointed out.

i hate when a post about offal, exotic foods, etc. has comments of "ewww, gross", "that looks disgusting", "i hate ______". fine, if you hate it, move on to the velveeta & sandra lee posts that are more your style!

wouldn't it be nice if we could 'favorite this' and 'hate this' for posts?

From Webster's Dictionary:

Serious:
1: thoughtful or subdued in appearance or manner : sober
2 a: requiring much thought or work b: of or relating to a matter of importance

3 a: not joking or trifling : being in earnest
barchaic : pious c: deeply interested : devoted
4 a: not easily answered or solved b: having important or dangerous possible consequences

5: excessive or impressive in quality, quantity, extent, or degree

Like the definition, our "Serious Eats" is sometimes thoughtful, sometimes earnest, sometimes not easily answered and almost always excessive and impressive in quality and quantity!


I know I am doing my level best to start topics with the goal of promoting relevant, timely and inspirational input from all the desperate housespouses!

@izatryt: Ha! See? This is precisely why people like me need "silly" topics on this site! I sometimes take myself and life *way* too seriously and I need to have some fun sometimes...this is a big reason why I love this site!

Oh, and sorry then, @simon. Please forgive me rant.

@annien: congratulations. You didn't actually call me an idiot, you just
said "... everyone has his or her own reason to think you're an idiot."
Sue me: I misspelled the name of a completely irrelevant patch of land. I'm up to any intellectual challenge you'd care to make. I'm willing to bet that I'm much smarter that you are.

Perhaps I am an idiot. Doesn't everyone also have his or her own reason to think I'm a misguided genius?

@LunaPierCook: I implied nothing: I asked if there was a way to cancel an account. I went on to say that I didn't want to cancel mine. Was this too complex for you? I love you anyway, and I mean no disrespect.

Topics I'd like to see? Bread. Simple, but daunting to the average person. I've been doing it for years, and it's not that difficult. Bread is the stuff of life.

Sounds like a disgruntled Canadian, eh?

Again, may I suggest eGullet?

@Don ~ Truly intelligent people don't need to say it out loud.

@DonLuis, asking what you asked was an implication.

Let me ask you something: If you don't like a restaurant, do you continue to go back anyway? After multiple visits over a long period of time, do you then complain that they don't serve food that's good enough for your taste, tell them they need to change, and point out that they should cater only to people who speak how you want them to speak?

That's what you're doing in this thread.

@ zatryt: too true; is it too late to retract?

I want to be strong enough to know that I am strong.

@Don ~ Have you considered therapy or medication?

Now this is entertaining.

Can we get an IP check? Is this another DocChuck incarnation?

@izzy~ i prefere valium and a lg ice coffe myself. lmao!

I would love to see some topics brought up for discussion. I see alot of picking at assorted nits but little constructive critisism. And btw, I do agree with one of Don Luis's statements, you guess which one. ;-)

I live in Tribeca, and I think it it is a far from an "irrelevant patch of land". I am, however, sure, Don Luis that any country that you reside in, is indeed poorer having you as an inhabitant. I feel you are certainly free to critcize any website and create debate. But you are lacking in manners and social skills, as shown by your callous comments. The people contributing to this site are very diverse , and that is the beauty. I embrace this, apparently you do not.

Count me on the side of readers who'd like to see more "serious" content (although I'm the first to admit I haven't done much myself). Personally, I'm more active and interested in the how-to/advice content versus the reader-poll posts.

From your examples, it seems like you are disappointed not only with the Talk posts, but with the site at large. So I think it's apropos to consider a different website, if you truly are committed to not posting here. You reference democracy, but you aren't taking the analogy far enough: how credibly can you complain if you don't make the effort to change things yourself? I'd welcome the chance to hear your thoughts on slow food and/or bread or what have you, but this--at least the Talk section--is community-created content; you've got to concede that it's inefficient to wait for someone to bring it up for you.

A lot of the conversation here seems serious to me. Over 90% of my posts are about hot dogs, but I'm darn serious about them. From the brand used, to the texture, style, method of preparation, and strongly held opinion that ketchup on a hot dog is an abomination and the last of the deadly sins. Yet people who disagree with me take some of my opinions TOO seriously to the point of putting words in my mouth and accusing me of wanting to ban it and prevent others from using it. It's an opinion board, so how can one's opinion be wrong?

@Don: That's true!

Frankly, I think this post is silly. I mean, honestly, @DL, what did you think was going to happen when you put something up ripping apart a site that, clearly, people here choose to be a part of?

It's all in the tone. You're not so good at the tone.

Simon's right. Go check out egullet.com. You can be terribly serious there. And, should you feel like the chattier talk stuff once in a while, ya got here, yes?

I admire and respect this site. I really enjoy a lot of the personalities (and their info and opinions). I stopped posting much a few months ago, beause I did not feel I contributed significantly to the ongoing dialogues. I still read most of the posts and many of the comments daily. I believe LoCo commented several times about the waxing and waning of one's participation, and I think the site, itself, goes through cycles of focus and tone.

There are a few comments that I would like to make about your questions, Don Luis. I do not live in NY - and I agree that many of the posts on this site focus on that city, or other large cities in the US. I actually don't ever expect any of the posts on this site to be about an food location that is remotely accessible to me (*exception - I live in Maine, and I am just a 15 minute drive from the Friendly Toast in Portsmouth NH, which was reviewed about a month ago - it made me sooo happy!). However, that doesn't lead me to believe that I can't enjoy the posts that are made about these places that I will probably never get to eat at - I still think it's fun to read about them. And if I ever get to go on a real vacation, maybe I will get to eat at one of these places.

Additionally, there are posts daily that include many different ethnicities of foods - notably Asian, but I have seen Italian, Spanish, French, Indian, Mexican, German, Greek, etc, etc, etc... So in no way does this site pretend that the rest of the world doesn't exist. One of the great things about eating ethnic foods is that it exposes you to places that you might not otherwise be able to get to. So I don't think that comment was exactly fair.

In terms of "serious" - as in, critical or essential - posts, the post two spots above this one when I come on tonight was about Honeybee colony collapse and the advancements being made by scientists to deal with this. This is an example of a serious discussion, and I get a lot of information on topics such as this from this website. And as was pointed out above me, there is the whole "serious efforts" threads that have been implemented.

Finally, I agree with the poster who said that their take on serious eats was not somber, critical, thoughtful, or subdued. My initial reaction to your post was the thought that, "I am looking for a serious cheeseburger, man, and this site has brought me some burger-nirvana." That is my interpretation of the seriousness of this site. Look at the graphics. We are meant to have fun here. Seriously.

I appreciate your attempt to express yourself. Please know that I would love to see more "serious" - your definition - posts here. As long as you understand that us "serious cheeseburger" people have a place here too. :)

@ simon "this site is populated by a large number of groupthink mentality afflicted housewives who are made very uncomfortable by any kind of critical tone"
You know that is not me, I love being critical. Winks

@bierebeer tie it in a knot man. Ask iza how to do it. Your wife is already spawning, give it a freaking rest.

I like how this site is both lowbrow and highbrow, arch and mundane, sarcastic and earnest. I don't think these oppositions create tension (until you posted), but rather accessibility.

watch out everyone, you don't want to step in all the shit the troll dragged in!

Alright Don, I called you an elitist casually and in a joking manner but clearly people are offended by your approach to your opinion. I honestly could care less, but I feel that it is my duty as a person who is not a chef (for a living)...just someone who happens to love food...... to say STFU!!! If you don't like the posts....DON'T READ THEM! We all come together and discuss WHATEVER intrigues us and I'm soooooooooo sorry (insert sarcasm) that it doesn't live up to your expectations of what us "serious eaters" should be discussing. I don't know you and maybe you are one of the best chefs in the world...who knows?!...but you are clearly unhappy with this website, so why even bother being here? Unless your objective was to get everyone all riled up?! If that's the case, then great job..........anywho, I'm going to bed.... Goodnight my Serious Eats folk... and FYI I love all of your "silly" posts! (0=

I think the "serious" before "eats" is wildly ambitious, as this website is not intended for certified chefs or restaurant owners. This is a site for people who prepare and eat food, though not necessarily for profit. I agree with the poster who described the reader base as junior varsity. The shows on Food Network are not produced for industry professionals, they are made for the average consumer. People in the industry do not talk about, nor consider Velveeta in the preparation of their dishes. People in the industry do not ask inane questions about what sort of cookware to use, for they already have considerable knowledge and confidence in the selections they have made when it comes to their kitchen. People in the industry do not have the time for a "serious" dialogue about ketchup and hash browns.

That being said, Don Luis should simply recognize this site for what it is and what its not. I too, am frequently frustrated by the lack of true content on this site. But I still visit it daily. I am not surprised by the verbal abuse of those posters who ~horror!~ disagree with the insights of Don Luis and Simon. I find there is always a gang-mentality when egos and reality come to a head.

True story ... I had a ex-BF who thought himself quite the impressive cook. His version of homemade foccacia was: 1) one BOX of bread mix, add water and 2) sprinkle one teaspoon of dried basil and oregano on top. This he truly considered this his personal masterpiece and that he was in some elitist club of authentic foodies. Personally, I believe that is the common mentality on this site. I'm not judging anyone. But let's call a spade a spade here ... this website is not intended for professionals working in the food industry.

Oh, and one more thought ... how many of you righteous posters are members of the ACF? Yeah, that's what I thought.

Whats the ACF?

@simon it is not Doc Schmuck, Doc Schmuck is passed out someplace with his thumb up his third point of contact.

Hmm. I thought this topic was already addressed at least in the Talk section by Serious Efforts. Perhaps those who would like to see more bare bones, strictly to cooking topics should do more posting under Serious Efforts. I haven't seen as much under Serious Efforts TaIk as I expected, after that bit of debate.
I like both the chatty and the streamlined staying on strictly on topic. A little of both worlds to add balance to what I'm reading.
And just as when I'm reading a magazine or newspaper--if the headline is not of interest or if the opening couple of sentences are not of my interest, I simply skip it.

@ Mrs Tomato - you're right the wife is spawning so the website works very fast when it comes to "sexfoods". To use the word "freakin" seems a little harsh, does somebody have a case of the grumpies? Does your tomato have blosson end rot, cracked skins or is mrtomato working late again? Now get serious donna luigi is reading!

ACF = American Culinary Federation

You people take yourselves way too "Serious"ly That said, I haven't laughed this hard in hours! Thanks!

80 posts??? He definitely got the attention he was seeking! lol

@smallkitchen--all of that vitriol and the last topic you started was asking for advice on how to peel a boiled egg?? Who's junior varsity? Get over yourself.

Don Luis at least had a point. You're just relying on pretense.

Negativetouch (aptly named moniker, btw) : yes, I started a thread about the hard boiled egg. I was looking for insider secrets about the chemistry of hard boiled eggs. I did not inquire as to how to peel them. I was looking for advice on how to cook them properly so as to not have difficulty peeling them. I did not ask about which pan to cook them in, or whether to put salt or Mrs. Dash on them, or whether or not to hard boil them or soft boil them, or if I made the right decision to make hard boiled eggs that day, yada yada. JV? Yes. That's why I came here. I received a good tip as well, which I appreciate.

I'm not a member of the ACF. I'm a Member of the SEF. Serious Eats Federation. And proud of it. And I know how to peel a boiled egg.

I freaking say whatever I want. Mr Tomato is always working just like he should be. Ok can we stick a fork in this because it is done.

Wow people, this is intense. I just spent 2 minutes of my time reading some of the comments - many of which were neither serious nor about eats but more than a few of which gave me a good laugh. I only read the stuff I want to on SE...I'm not sure I see a problem with that approach. If you like it, take it and if you don't, leave it. Let us each be! Or as one commented suggested, maybe @DL should just start his own blog.

Somebody get grandpa his oatmeal and a mug of ersatz postum!

I'm amused by the irony.

@smallkitchen: For the record, I only ever once made any kind of bread from a mix of any kind, and it was foul. i never even use a bread machine (no space and no money, plus kneading a special form of therapy, as anyone who does it on a regular basis knows...).

Great, now I want to bake bread..why can't my office kitchen have an oven?

I think the term "serious" refers more to a serious obsession with food. Or at least that's what I get out of it.

Plus, I think it's a great source for all food-related news!

Hillary

thank goodness for Jerzee calling an end to this, "seriously".. (0= you rock!

@Don Luis
I didn't know Puerto Rico is a poor country or that it didn't have anything to do with Puerto Rico.

If it says anything, I'm also registered to Chowhound, but I visit Serious Eats everyday and Chowhound only rarely with a very very specific query.

call me crazy, but isn't the range of experience levels what is great about a community? if everyone was always at the same level no one would be able to answer anyone's questions. i for one have some more to learn as i'm NOT a food professional, and that's why i'm here. but it doesn't mean i like velveeta -- christ!

@magannesta~hey leave velveeta outta this. lol.

@dearrie ~ Velveeta isn't real, remember???

OK, no one is making comments on this thread anymore. So it's a perfect time for me to weigh in! Yes, we are all silly, as Don Luis has noticed. But we shouldn't be defensive about it. I can cook pretty well--but when I come home from work, my favorite dinner is the Costco shrimp wonton soup that I see Asian families loading into their carts, because they know it tastes good, too. I am a bundle of paradoxes; I can taste the difference between good and bad food, but does that mean I always want to create it? Much of the time I am a lazy slug.
So Serious Eats appeals to the part of me that wants to cook "grand" and eat out very well, and also to the "slugfest" (that comes out of a frozen box, or a box of noodles) I occasionally yearn for.
I think Don Luis' original post was playful and challenging. It was not devastating and hurtful. So my take on this thread is "Blog ON!!!" Don Luis: keep up your comments. And tell us what YOU do well after a long day of work!

I have an idea for a thread... Velveeta, WAY or NO WAY? :-)

@izzy~sorry i forgot. i still have the block i stole from your curb, way back when. i'm gonna use it like a chi-pet and see what grows. i'm thinking something in the color green.

@dearrie ~ Good luck with that!

@dm ~ NO WAY! I am not sure if you were around for the thread about my Velveeta "gift". It explains volumes!!

@smallkitchen~~I sometimes think the difficulty or not of peeling the HBE is proportionate to the rough life the chicken had before it laid said egg before it became a HBE. (trying to be serious but laughing at myself, even)

I love this site, it's entertaining and educational, and I keep coming back for more.

don luis kant help me self gotta let ya kno Ima gonna ignore yer post like yu shood du wen ya dont geev a sheet aboot et , sail-on

@mich23: "I am, however, sure, Don Luis that any country that you reside in, is indeed poorer having you as an inhabitant."

I could not, however, have said that, any better, myself. Well, perhaps I could: Don Luis, I'm sure that any country in which you live is poorer as a result.

@shipwreck: Hint: if you want to ignore a post, don't respond to it.

Where are you from? I don't recognize the accent. Perhaps you should write in your native language; you are not much good at English.

Um, sail on dude. Whatever.

@Teachertalk: sometimes I make pizza from scratch, and sometimes I make hot dogs and Kraft mac and cheese. Costco sells a frozen French onion soup that I love: I always have it in the freezer for when I need it. I cook several time a week for an extended family of six. It's always a challenge to find food that everyone will like, food we can afford, and food we have the time to make.

I was trying to be playful, and I regret that many people took it the wrong way. I am serious about food, perhaps too serious. Thank you for your post.

I joined Serious Eats at the beginning, and I'd just hate to see it go the way of the Food Network. I'm just not willing to follow their lead in trading Mario Batali for Guy Fieri. I'm a long time Serious Eats reader and sometimes contributor; if I didn't care, I wouldn't comment.

@ those of you who pointed out that I must be a man, because my screen name is "Don Luis", and I wrote "I'm a bitter old man":

Newsflash: you can lie in the Internet. Were it not for the anonymity, I doubt that some of you would have had the courage to post what you did. (BTW, I'm actually a 19-year old Swedish super model named Inga.)

By far, this may be one of the single stupidest threads that have ever sprouted on SE.

@ Don Luis....Sir, Ma'am, whatev...I can agree that sometimes SE gets a little crazy. Hell, we ALL get a little crazy. I am the single most hateful, bitter woman in the entire United States and I hold back NOTHING as all of the folks here on SE can attest to. THAT being said, its a simple case of checking the boards (known as trolling) and simply clicking the itsy bitsy X in the corner of the page if you arent interested. I am a a member of 9 different "foodie" pages, all of which have boards. I am sure that number can be multiplied by a million and there are that many more floating around out there. Certainly, if SE doesn't have something to entice you today, another page might.

I have not been the biggest advocate of SE over the last few months because of some uhhhh, well, we will call it "monitoring" issues, HOWEVER, anytime you are going to post a post like you have, basically calling bullshit on SE, you are, in fact, going to be tarred and feathered. Its just how it is.

p.s. I would do illegal things with Guy Fieri and I would take 3 of him of Mario's washed up fat ass any day of the week.

Come on guys, give Don a break...you know that a lot of what he said is true, you just don't want to own up to it.

@Chelley ~ Good to see you remain true!

When you say "Checking the boards", whatever that may mean (and it certainly doesn't mean trolling) it belies your age. Here's a site that talks about trolling. I'm sure that there are still "message boards", but most of us post on "blogs" now.

Please take a look, and stop SHOUTING.

I don't have an itsy bitsy X in the corner of the page; I don't use Microsoft products. No sane person does (for the more sensitive, I'm kidding).

Many here say "go somewhere else." Do you assume that I don't look at other food sites? I do. All the time. And I'd like SE to live up to some of those other sites.

When you say "3 of him of Mario's washed up fat ass", I'm guessing you mean "three of him over Mario's washed up fat ass". To me, that's the issue. Guy is a hyped-up, Food Network husker. He can't be washed up: he has never been. Mario is a talented chef, known the world over. He's certainly done some questionably commercial stuff, but he's a proven chef.

Personally, I wouldn't do illegal stuff with either of them. That would be illegal.

Sigh. I am totally sticking to my very first statement in my above post.

You sir, are a waste of time and yes, SE has boards, not blogs as does Chow.

@ dmcavanaugh...are you serious? You dont think that we call SE out? Why do you think so many of us have stopped commenting? We do. We have. We will continue to do so. You think that Don Luis, who only appears randomly and mostly to whine about Wal-Mart ads and whatnot, is the only person to call bullshit? Think again.

@ Iz...you know how I roll!

Indeed Chelley, indeed.


boy! i'm glad I tuned into this one late!

i can feel the love. @ chelley, iz see ya on the other side.

@dearrie ~ Here is to The Other Side! *Clink* *Clink*

Sounds like you need to go to chowhound.

@Don Luis: This is obviously a very late response, but I don't check into SE as often as I did so I missed it when it first went up.

I think your reaction arises from a misunderstanding of what SE is, or means to be.

My impression is that SE began as a NYC-based blog, and that the response from all over the US expanded its focus. I don't think it's unreasonable for a blog to have a regional focus, particularly given that SE is not presenting itself as a global food-related site.

Although I am a New Yorker (meaning 'born there, and spent the largest portion of my life to date there'), I now live outside the US (in Denmark, to be precise), and many of the references to various cooking shows and foods go over my head, but if I'm really curious, I can usually find clarification on YouTube, or elsewhere on the net.

Perhaps what you see as an excess of silliness has more to do with the veiled (or not) hostility that more serious/technical posts sometimes meet; I no longer see many of the more serious posters, which I think is a shame. On the other hand, I think the 'silliness' can be fun and interesting, I just wish there was more of a balance (for those of you who are thinking of reiterating that there are other sites, I know this, but I happen to like SE, and think of it as a big kitchen; shouldn't there be room for all sorts of cooks and eaters?).

Anyway, I think SE is worth taking for what it is; I can understand deciding that you'd rather not post (although you don't seem to have done that), and only look in occasionally, but do recognize what it is, and why.

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.

Start Talking!

Need a question answered? Have advice to share? Start a Talk topic now!

Sign up to start a talk topic

Sign up to get your questions answered and share advice.