What makes a 'Celebrity Chef'?
Is it affiliation with a good restaurant... talent, creativity and personality...is it the media...a good publicist...public acceptance...a combination of the above? Do you think the concept of 'Celebrity Chef' has gone overboard? There are many great talents out there that do their work day to day without as much recognition...
Add a comment:
Previewing your comment:
HTML Hints
Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>
Comment Guidelines
Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.
If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.
Start Talking!
Need a question answered? Have advice to share? Start a Talk topic now!
Sign up to get your questions answered and share advice.

19 Comments:
I dunno. But has anyone seen this letter in the New York Times from Wednesday? http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/31/dining/31lett-UNIMPRESSED_LETTERS.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=bryan%20carr&st=cse
I know this chef - and I agree with him.
lemons at 5:21PM on 01/01/09
When I'm eating at a restaurant, I don't necessarily know who the chef is, and the person in charge of the kitchen on any given night might not be the same person who created the menus and recipes. If the creator isn't around and the people on the line can recreate the dishes properly, I'm fine with that.
Sure, I'd like a famous chef to cook my meal personally, but that's pretty unlikely to happen unless I win some sort of contest. Or unless I catch tomorrow's famous chef at today's "flipping burgers" stage of their career.
But being a good restaurant chef isn't the same thing as being a good TV chef, just like being a good print reporter doesn't necessarily translate to being an on-air personality. Sometimes a person will have both talents; sometimes not.
If someone is entertaining on TV, I don't think they necessarily have to have a string of restaurants first. I mean, Alton Brown is entertaining and educational, but not a restaurant chef. And someone being a good restaurant chef doesn't always translate to what I can do in my kitchen, based on equipment and ingredients. Yes, it might be entertaining to watch the Sous Vide Chef for an episode or two, but after that, it would lose its value because I can't recreate the dishes at home.
dbcurrie at 7:26PM on 01/01/09
Fame, or infamy.
PerkyMac at 8:55PM on 01/01/09
Maybe the combo of all the above. I also think that it takes a certain personality and how you react to people that does the trick itself. I mean there are some wonderful chefs out there but they do not have the "UMPH" it takes to attract an audience and keep them stay tuned. If they had a show that was all about cooking (and strictly cooking, that's it) then fine. But with all the other reality shows and ext, the networks are driving to the people who like that. Therefore you get the competitions, the Y'alls, the tablescrapes, the Evoo, the cleavages, the BAMS, and all the other drama.
pjracz10 at 12:20AM on 01/02/09
@pjracz--not to mention names or anything. ;)
buffy at 12:43AM on 01/02/09
I don't know but I kinda like Mario's cleavage.
chardonnay at 1:03AM on 01/02/09
@lemons--your chef friend wrote a very eloquent letter, btw. Maybe he should have his own column and cookbook ;)
'Celebrity chef' by definition is cheesy, because celebrity almost by definition just means you are popular. Some celebrities are very talented as well as popular, but many celebrities from all professions are not talented but simply notorious and/or well-marketed. If celebrity meant talent then Paris Hilton would not be a celebrity and more people would not be able to identify her face and name than Helen Mirren.
In terms of a TV food personality who is 'good' as opposed to just well known, I think it is about a passion for food and an ability to communicate, not being able to run a restaurant kitchen. For example, Julia Child and Alton Brown and yes, Anthony Bourdain translate their love of food and personal passions about food in a way that is compelling, and at least in the case of JC and AB (who I have never seen but has a huge following from people I respect on this board like dbcurrie) they also educate the public and provide a valuable 'resource.'
Some chefs are good managers, some are good cooks, some are good cookbook writers, some are good teachers on TV and off. There is room for all in the profession, I think. I just wish there was less room for a few male and female boobs, though, on the boob tube.
HeartofGlass at 8:39AM on 01/02/09
@Heart, pick up one of AB's cookbooks at the library and browse through it; you'll get a good idea of his style and you'll get a good idea whether you'd like that style or not. He's kind of nerdy, and some of his TV props are a little cheesy, which I think is part of his charm. I mean, if you have to know about molecular bonds or whatever, it's more amusing and maybe easier to understand if he's cutting up garden hoses and playing with toy trains.
I saw him on some show and he explained that his scientific cooking approach wasn't born because he was good at science or cooking -- it was his only way of mastering cooking -- by figuring out why things worked a certain way. And in the process he learned the science and was able to create edible food. So he's not at all pompous or arrogant.
Anyway, his books are sort of the same way. If you like his style, then it might be worthwhile to buy one of his books.
dbcurrie at 3:14PM on 01/02/09
@chardonnay - yes I agree, I'd like to see him drop a piece of spaghetti down the crack or something haha
I think a 'celebrity chef' might be defined by their ability to make a statement in the media, usually have their own TV show at one point, they can usually relate to their intended audience, have a cute bum (maybe? I dunno), some little trademark sayings...yeah pretty much what the above thread has already said.
hungrychristel at 3:55PM on 01/02/09
be careful of the crack you wish for. it could be wow or ewww.
dearrie at 4:13PM on 01/02/09
This is an interesting question which Ruhlman addresses in his "Reach of a Chef." I think the frustrating part for professionals like myself is that in order for one usually to reach the celebrity status, they generally must forgo that which makes them famous in the first place. This, in turns, leads people to begrudge them their ability to cook. Even Bourdain had to recant and admit that Emeril was an extremely talented young chef who utilized his charisma to establish an empire. I think the real question is: when a chef becomes a celebrity, is he really still a chef? Not to argue semantics, but (and I know most avoid the word because it sounds pedestrian by comparison) shouldn't they really be celebrity cooks or just plain celebrities? After all, aren't Emeril/Bourdain/Colicchio (these days) more of an entertainer than anything else? Particularly Bourdain and Colicchio who don't even cook on tv.
fischersentropy at 4:55PM on 01/02/09
@dbcurrie--sounds like I would love him. I love America's Test Kitchen, Howard McGee and all of that geeky food science stuff. Cheesy props and truly smart people are a plus!
HeartofGlass at 6:28PM on 01/02/09
I appreciate the demonstration/educational type of food tv that Julia Child began. What Alton Brown continues, and I would even qualify Giada's Everyday Italian in this category. But I hate that FN has moved away from even the "celebrity chefs" and towards entertainment as their main programming. Good Deal with Dave Lieberman has been relegated to a 4:30 am slot, yet prime slots (evenings and weekend afternoons) are filled with (other than Good Eats) Unwrapped, Food Network Challenges, and Dinner: Impossible, all which I see more as "entertainment" than food shows. I think that's worse than what "celebrity chef" has become. Thankfully, we still have PBS.
cara_mia at 10:17PM on 01/02/09
For me it's a combination of these:
* Someone who has to know what he or she is doing at the stove because it's an opinion I have formed and not one created by a media machine.
* An inventive cook who can make something glorious out of nothing, by the sheer knowledge of experience.
* Where it concerns a specific restaurant, I have to remember a dish to the point where it permeates my dreams. ("I was walking through a purple forest and came upon a lime green table - and that Beef Wellington was beautifully plated and waiting for me!")
* As far as having a show, I need to learn from the demonstrations performed by the chef. He or she must be comfortable in front of a camera, i.e.: Ina, Giada, Mario. The babble gene, i.e. Shamdra Lee, Cheap Chic or whatever the hell her name was - makes me want to drip lye into my ears. There's a reason the camera focuses on Ina's hands - she's doing something worth watching. There's very little education in watching someone put corn oil in cake mix.
@Cara_Mia - I love Dave Lieberman. You would think with the economy in the toilet, they'd showcase him more given his schpiel is economical cooking. ((Shrugs))
therealchiffonade at 10:35AM on 01/03/09
someone who became famous because of food, but no longer needs to cook.
bionicgrrl at 4:49PM on 01/03/09
I define a Celebrity Chef as one who:
A) Appears on television;
B) Has their name on a product;
C) Has written a book;
D) Is recognized around the world;
E) Travels all over the world;
F) Is no longer living paycheck to paycheck.
They are EXTREMELY Lucky and were in the right place at the right time.
paris221966 at 6:54PM on 01/04/09
Wow I have nothing to add as db and paris summed it up so nice. I find it very annoying how easy it is to be a celebrity chef as all you need is FN behind how and they will market the crap out of you till you WILL be a star! You don't even need talent anymore.
love2cook at 8:23AM on 01/05/09
I believe a celebrity Chef is a person that becomes a Star Chef without knowing he or she will become so successful...like Mike Symon of Cleveland.
You see shows like Top Chef and there are some contestants that really ham it up for the camera ,they want to be the next Mario and it shows because they are trying way too hard.
Which reminds me...does anyone else think that Alton Brown has changed?? My husband and I think his head has gotten a little too big.....just an observation.
Nemis at 9:20AM on 01/05/09
@nemis: Its the new hair style.
spiceweasel at 3:24PM on 01/13/09