Food Priorities--how do you prioritize these factors?
It seems to me that there are always a variety of factors going into any food decision, and for every person the definition is different but no one can entirely ignore all of these factors:
Nutrition: This varies from person to person, whether it is calorie-counting, having enough veggies, eating for athletic performance, and so forth
Cost: This may vary from simply being able to afford only certain things on a buget, or even if you can afford it, the sense of 'I'm not paying 3.99 for a pint of blueberries'
Lifestyle: Being a busy mom with chicken finger/Pop Tart loving kids, a food critic, a college student, having to eat late because of a job, or even just being part of a couple that likes to eat out alot, being a food blogger, and so forth
Ethics: Being a vegan, keeping kosher, eating to reduce your carbon footprint, whatever your morality may be
Culture: From 'we always eat turkey on Thanksgiving' to eating Halloween candy, to eating traditional dishes whether they are your favorite or not
Taste: What you think tastes good!
Of course, it's lovely when all these things cohere perfectly, but often (or sometimes) they don't--so how do you arrange these different priorities in your mind?
Add a comment:
Previewing your comment:
HTML Hints
Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>
Comment Guidelines
Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.
If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.
Start Talking!
Need a question answered? Have advice to share? Start a Talk topic now!
Sign up to get your questions answered and share advice.
Recently Commented On in Talk
Sponsored Link
Recipe
Mango Bean Salad
Fresh fruit and hearty beans make a refreshing side for our Morningstar
Farms® Southwestern Style Veggie Cakes.
Get this recipe »
20 Comments:
I have to say, being a former chubby kid, nutrition and keeping to a 'calorie budget' is number one. Next lifestyle--I'm single, and I don't have to worry too much about suiting other people's palates, so that affects lots of my food choices. Ethics would come next--I'm a vegetarian, almost vegan, followed by personal taste. Being vegetarian means I'm not as affected by high food prices as much, as does the fact I'm buying for one and culture is very unimportant--I am Greek/Irish/Italian/German-Jewish, and none of those cuisines are my favorites.
Most of the time these things cohere, but I still have occasional bouts of 'pastry fear' and I'm probably a bit less adventurous with new menus because of my concern for nutrition, diet, athletic performance, and also not eating animal protien. Although lots of interesting cuisines are veggie based!
HeartofGlass at 6:02AM on 05/08/08
I think for me taste has to be the first factor followed closely by nutrition and price. to be honest lifestyle and culture have very little to do with my food choices. Ethically speaking, I will choose humanely raised over not and local organic first and foremost, but that isnt to say my entire decision is based on those things. I think what makes this such a difficult question to answer is that even though this is a balancing act, it is becoming a balancing act of a different kind because of the rising cost of food as well as more awareness of our environment.
huney_bumper at 7:15AM on 05/08/08
The two built-in and equally important factors I consider without even thinking of the fact that I consider them are nutrition and taste. Since we haven't won a lottery yet (not that we ever will, as I recall something about having to buy a ticket in order to win), cost comes close second, although, as huney said, it truly is a balancing act. So while I'd much rather buy locally grown produce and humanely raised chickens, this is not always the key factor in my food-buying choices. Culture mostly comes into play during holidays, although I never think that there is something I have to eat even though I don't like it - taste & nutrition would still come first. Lifestyle...I'm sure it is a factor (for instance, we don't have children and both have offices at home), but not something I intentionally consider.
brooke29 at 10:49AM on 05/08/08
It' interesting to read other peoples priorities, here's mine:
1. Nutrition - I actually CRAVE nutrients/minerals from specific foods when my body needs it. And it feels like nothing else will do. I'm so wierd.
2. Culture - I grew up on traditional German foods, with multi-euro flare. This is my comfort food and I notice that I'll grab a Jagerwurst or some Hungerian Salami in the grocery store--whether I need it or not!
3. Taste - The first two apply to this one too, right? haha
4. Ethics - If there is an option; I will buy Organic/Local--mostly because it applies to priority #1
5. Lifestyle - I go out of my way for an ingredient, anytime. After work, my life pretty much revolves around food. But if I were a mother, I'm sure that would change.
hungrychristel at 12:53PM on 05/08/08
Great question!
1. Nutrition - but not at the expense of
2. Taste! Flavor is always critical, but it's important that the food not be highly processed junk.
3. Ethics - with sub-priorities of local, then organic, then ethical (free trade etc)
4. Cost - I do pay attention to price when I shop, and often the factor that decides What's For Dinner is What's On Sale. :)
5. Lifestyle - We have varying schedules and only get to eat meals together once or twice a week. This does affect the way I cook because I try to make meals that reheat well and make good leftovers.
6. Culture - This doesn't really come into play for us. We're not of a particular cultural background. The flip side is that there's not much variety of ethnic foods available where we live anyway, so it's a moot point.
pieninja at 1:36PM on 05/08/08
Taste is way ahead of anything else on that list. The rest sort of fall equally at the bottom of the list.
Cost and nutrition mean little to me when I crave something.
My husband stays at home, so lifestyle plays a really small role. When I call him from work and tell him I'm craving a pot of beef stew, he has the 4-5 hours to make it.
I don't let cultural baggage control what I should or shouldn't eat on a day of the year. If I am in the mood for sukiyaki on Thanksgiving Day, I am going to make it. In the case of Thanksgiving, I don't really eat poultry or most pork, i.e., ham or bacon, so it's not a big deal (don't care for the flavor), for me at least. Since I'm agnostic and he's an athiest, we don't have dietary restrictions based on religion either. I guess that falls under ethics...?
Cassaendra at 2:06PM on 05/08/08
It used to be cost first and foremost then nutrition, tradition and culture (in its way) and it was always a struggle and unpleasant. Gained weight too, constantly felt hungry with never-ending cravings.
Divesting from the ex™ with his demands, my daughter and I went vegetarian. The first Thanksgiving was a struggle in the run-up until I decided to just let it go. We stuck with tradition in as much as we still treated ourselves but we went with all the things we wanted and those things we didn't eat because they seemed too expensive. We had a selection of stuff from around the world and just prepared each one at a time, enjoying stress-free.
After that everything seemed to snap into place. The ethical and moral implications are easier so we were left with choosing local and organic which tasted so much better as well (and turns out to be more nutritious too). Price is much more manageable without meat (and is less time intensive from preparation to clean-up) but it turns out with proper nutrition most of the cravings and the hunger went away even though we were eating less (which also costs less). Weight dropped too even though we'd never felt more satisfied.
So letting go of tradition and the "shoulds" was key and I'll never let it keep me from doing what's the best thing for us again. Food is absolutely incredible now.
Sieseye at 9:56PM on 05/08/08
Sieseye, it's funny you mention that ^^^ After my mother divorced my father, her eating became much healthier, since she didn't have to meet his demands to always produce a big dinner--he was very particular (no leftovers) and although was proud of the fact he never ate dessert, had many food peculiarities, like not eating all day and then devouring spaghetti with a half a can of Parmesan cheese, an entire wheel of Provelone, and being very particular in general about his food but in a high-caloric way.
I think sometimes instead of looking to the past (Michael Pollan aside) it's better to make new traditions if the old ones aren't working for you.
HeartofGlass at 5:38AM on 05/09/08
I guess the first would be nutrition, if by nutrition you mean "avoid the half-dozen things that would make me sick to the point of disability." Since that means avoiding most processed food/chemicals/pesticides/etc, etc - it ends up being combined with ethics.
Taste is next - food should taste good - followed somewhat by cost. An $10 chicken is all well and good since I can make three or four meals off of it, but $15 for ramps? No thanks.
Lifestyle and culture are somewhats. I like keeping a couple of quick meals on hand for bad days, and usually factor that into meal planning. Likewise, I'm a southern girl, so that influence tends to show up a lot when cooking (even if my actual cooking repertoire is usually anything but southern food). Most of my food ends up being pretty seasonal out of necessity.
jenilowrance at 8:50AM on 05/09/08
Quality
Flavor
Fat Content/Health Effect
Convenience of shopping
Price
I surprised myself by listing price last. My mother was a Depression baby and scrimped wherever possible. Price has so little to do with my food choices these days - it's funny how the paradigm has shifted.
Quality is always first. It doesn't have to be expensive to be a quality product. Flavor is something that dictates me, I don't dictate it. I can't eat food that tastes like crap, no matter how healthy it might be for me.
Fat quantity and overall effect on health do make a difference. I don't fry foods and I don't buy instacrap (^^^^ salt!).
Convenience of shopping is where I cut "time" corners. Not in the cooking of quality food. This means I sometimes shop at Wal-Mart or whatever supermarket is closest to me. (Right now it's Publix...Not cheap but excellent quality.) When I worked on Wall Street (21 years) and raised a daughter primarily on my own, good food went on the table every night. Did I make stew from scratch on a Wednesday? No. Did I cook enough stew on a Sunday to make sure I had it for during the work week? Definitely. This is why the whole "I'm busy and have no time to cook" response falls on deaf ears with me. I dropped my daughter off at day care, took the subway, worked at a demanding job all day, took the subway, picked up my daughter and cooked dinner nearly every night. It's entirely possible if you budget your time efficiently. And don't think for a minute I didn't enjoy my weekends!! Beach, outings, weekends at friends' houses - I did all of that too - with daughter in tow.
Right this minute - if I had to choose one facet of the decision making process as the "rudder" where it pertains to food - I'd have to put Health Effect as #1. Quality of course is ever present, looming over with its watchful eye on my purchases - these two definitely rule.
chiff0nade at 10:29AM on 05/09/08
My first priority was not on your list - it is to make whomever I'm feeding happy. That, of course, encompasses bits and pieces of many of the things listed, but it is different for each person that sits at the table, so the list gets shifted each time to suit.
It is actually impossible for me to put the priorities in order, even for myself (though I rarely plan food "just for me") for what is important one day may not feel as important the next day. And I never cook to show off what I can do, which happens in foodie-ism at times, which I guess would be one more thing to add to the priority list - "to impress" (which is not a minor attraction in any enthusiasm one might have not only with foodie-ism).
The only food priority I have is . . . To make it all about You.
Karen Resta at 11:38AM on 05/09/08
HeartofGlass, I wish it were funnier actually. The ex™ was a nightmare. I can't even begin to describe it. He was very much a meat eater (and yet he married the next girl who gave him any attention and she's a vegetarian too so now he takes the daughter when he has her to places he can eat meat even if she doesn't want to go there...). He also was very controlling in all things but he really played games with food; as did his mom to him in that she would make all kinds of desserts and then forbid the kids from having any so that they learned to cut half inch pieces off the entire end of a pan of brownies rather than just take a piece.
So... he gave a lot of pressure to buy cheap because we weren't worth it, withholding money and being the one to pay for the food which meant we went when he said it was okay, and he watched everything go in the cart so everything had to be justified... and since he was a big sweet tooth it was easier to get crap in the cart but not healthy stuff.
About 10 years in I just quit making food. He was so critical. Nothing was good enough, fast enough, made often enough, made too often, made too much, not enough... I asked him one time what he would like to eat and he refused to tell me and his reasoning was that I would then make that for him and then he'd get it too often. Towards the very end he finally said that whoever does the cooking should be the one who get prerogative over what is served and the eater should just be happy; that of course contradicted his behavior the entire time. But the worst was he taught the daughter to be extremely critical. The only good thing is that when I did quit cooking they both missed it because I was actually pretty danged good and now am even better but in a whole different way. Unfortunately it was a good two years after parting before I could face doing more than opening a can or ripping open a box for the frozen dinner. The abuse just completely shut me down. Even still I struggle.
As far as eating better? Yeesh! Just in that I can have a package of cookies or ice cream for more than the day they are bought... he'd eat an entire big package as just knowing they existed made him insane so I found myself trying to get my share in before he finished it off, or worse, hoarding and hiding. Not to mention I craved crap more... just such a depressing situation.
And those are just some highlowlights.
But it sounds like you had some idea with the parmesan and provolone (and other high cal oddities). As icky as it is, it does feel nice that you can understand. The ex™ had a cheese fetish too absolutely covering some foods with a thick layer and I understand he does that to the spaghetti he gets these days (hee hee -- not my problem anymore and apparently I wasn't *his* problem...). I love all the fruits and veggies I get to have these days and I spent about two weeks last summer having pretty much nothing but "tomayo" sandwiches for every meal while I spent a great deal of several other weeks eating a zucchini/tomato fresh cranberry bean mixture only to go into a tomatillo chili jag and it was all okay. Quite possibly the best summer ever. :)
Sieseye at 11:53AM on 05/10/08
Sieseye - It is a crime against the soul when someone plays games with food (or with any good thing such as food) against someone else (as has occurred in the examples you detail above).
I've had similar experiences in the past. It added another confusing layer to it all having been a well-respected chef to have this occur.
There are intellectual answers as to "why" but there is no good final answer, emotionally . . . except definitely to be really sure you know who you are cooking for. And to know that there are actually people in the world who do set out to fool people for their own rather sick internal reasons - and to be sure to avoid ever cooking for them.
Your new food priorities sound delicious. Bon appetit on and into the future!
Now I'm longing for a tomato sandwich! :)
Karen Resta at 12:35PM on 05/10/08
Karen, thanks so much for your sentiments and good wishes. I agree with you. I'm also very sorry for the pains you've had to go through in your past. Wish we'd been given better tools to avoid them and/or know we didn't need to endure them.
While I'll never understand the need to inflict the same pain they went through on others, I do get (now) that they have some serious pain/issues they aren't able to deal with for whatever reason. Of course, that doesn't mean I need to put up with it and in fact now know that anyone who does so (whether by conscious choice or not) is enabling them to not face their demons.
Rather philosophical for food but boy does so much get wrapped up in food. Rewards, punishments, celebrations, worth...
We were talking in another thread about how some people exert control over others by slipping meat into vegetarian dishes. That's another need I'll never quite understand.
At least I know better now, and even though I recently dated someone who presented a facade of acceptance and excitement over food only to turn out to be just as critical, I realized it quickly and put it out of my life quickly (though months later he's still dogging me as I apparently have done him great damage for not accepting him in all his flawed -- and mean, soul-sucking -- glory). We can't "make" someone happy and trying at our own expense is folly. Better one miserable person than two.
Yes! The tomato sandwich. I had no idea till last August. So simple even though quality and particulars are so important. Organic white sandwich bread from the local independent bakery a couple blocks away, toasted and slathered with good mayo and topped with thick slices of just picked, super ripe big toms from the farmers market, generously salted and heavily sprinkled with crumbled dried basil (the fresh was available but not quite the same), and eaten open (tomato doesn't squish out and I'm not big on bread). Like heaven, not terrible nutritionally, yet wouldn't have been considered a "meal" before. I can hardly wait to try again to make myself tired of them. Until then I'm going to revel in local strawberries, then blueberries, then cherries... Life *is* good. :)
Sieseye at 3:12AM on 05/11/08
Siseye and Karen Resta, thanks for sharing such wonderful stories of coming back from a negative relationship, culinarily and spiritually. As positive as food can be, I think lots of times in families it is used as a negative instrument of control--and as a vegetarian, it's interesting how with my stepmother and my father, quite often she would leave the room and have a tantrum if I didn't eat what she prepared, and I have accidentally eaten meat on a number of occasions, including bacon bits in a salad ("it is not meat, it is just bits," according to her) and every kind of chicken fat in the potatos, rice she cooks. Also, when she served chips with olestra in them I refused to eat them (having read the label about the *ahem* side effects) she pitched a fit...as if she had made them herself, rather than opening the bag!
On topic, I do see that with many women in relationships, 'lifestyle' in the sense of the prefrences of their partner or children takes priority, even if they would prefer to eat healthier or more adventurous options
HeartofGlass at 7:38AM on 05/11/08
Yes, to so much of what both of you have written, Sieseye and HeartofGlass.
Food, with all its potential to heal, nurture, succor, please, carry love - in some hands at some times has its dark side.
The lifestyle issue is huge for almost every woman who is a care-giver to others apart from herself - with the balancing point being something one always has to question, almost in self-defense. :)
Making food that was finely honed for my guest's taste was a skill that served me well in a professional sense. Kudos, money, better jobs, etc, followed upon the heels of this way of being. To have that turned against me was one of the biggest shocks of my life. I still don't believe that it really could and did happen.
The discussion of whether women chefs cook differently than men chefs is an interesting one, also - many agree that more often than not, we do.
As a professional rule, one can cook "to the food itself" (impressing one's own persona upon the food) or one can cook "to the diner" (thinking more of what the person at the table would want if asked). Obviously overall there has to be some balance or either creativity or diner appeal would be lost on either side, but often there is a feel to the food of women chefs or there is a feel attached to their intent in what they make that is not there or is differently shaped with men chefs. The most outstanding example of this is the currently low level of women chefs who are involved in molecular gastronomy - a metier which is more about the food itself than it is about the diner. The diner bows to the food - not the food bowing to the diner.
This may change of course - it might be only one of those "women in science" discussions but I rather think not. I think in food there is more than that - there is a mystery and there are indefinable things that it carries that other things or metiers in life do not carry. Which of course makes it the most fascinating thing.
We do have a responsibility to look at how we prioritize the factors that go into our food choices. Not only for ourselves but most particularly when we are mothers with children who are watching our behavior, who may someday model it or who may someday run like hell from it. We have to find a way to offer them the best bites, the best tastes, the best memories - that our hearts can offer . . . and for each one of us that is something entirely different. If it is given with love and intelligence, it should work as intended - to give nurture and love to those we care for. But we all have our different ways which make life interesting.
Thanks for starting this discussion, HeartofGlass. :)
Karen Resta at 10:05AM on 05/11/08
This is a great discussion. Yes, thank you HeartofGlass. :)
So much touched on here.
My stalker is Libra which I thought when I read about them (out of curiousity not to guide my life) means balance but more that they achieve balance by wild swings rather than hanging in the middle. :(
Balance. That's what is missing from so much but especially food these days. We've taken food apart from the very beginning, with monster farms growing only one thing supported by chemicals which meant putting the animals elsewhere in huge building supported by chemicals which meant putting their waste in huge pools... no integrations, instead attempting to solve each new problem with more tech which only creates new problems.
Interesting the gender thing. I've been watching Gordon Ramsey because I loved the idea of the remaking a restaurant to work better (I have a secret desire to have my own cozy food emporium with inexpensive but yummy comfort food of the best quality). His no nonsense approach appealed to me because it's more about little tolerance for idiocy and manipulation rather than being mean. I found out later how little respect he gives to those who shun meat which is still hard to reconcile (he's a famous one who has taken pleasure in sneaking meat in veggie meals). However I happened on his new chef competition show where there's a woman's team and a men's team. The girls were all working together and talking while the guys wouldn't even acknowledge each other and undercut, tricked, schemed... but in the end when it came to knocking one out at the end the girls did turn catty (hate that word but that was what happened) and it turned the next show unpleasant because of the resentment factor. However, one of the guys was so fed up by the way the guys are he asked to be allowed on the woman's team. That's next week. I'm so intrigued to find out how it goes. So it's especially interesting the point about food science and molecular food.
In another round of coincidences, I had just come back yesterday from a seminar on the Myths of Vegetarian Eating where the question was asked about why so many are resistant. The speaker talked about how mothers (mom's day being the next day) have their identity so wrapped up in the food they present, as well as the nurture factor, they take their child going veggie as a rejection of them rather than the meat, cruelty, political, or whatever. Then along with the societal pressures and the industry that has pressed our ideas of nutrition, it feels as if we (as mothers) are being told we've never understood how to keep our children healthy... that we aren't very smart after all. Lots get twisted into our meals. It's not just food by any means.
I know my daughter has been taken aback by how accepting I've been of her going veggie (even becoming one myself -- I just needed a reason) then going vegan. In some ways I've unintentionally undermined her rebellion but in a good and loving way. I even started sending her to cooking classes which she despised in the beginning (natural extension of the resistance) but now pretends to tolerate while having gained huge confidence in the kitchen and become valuable amongst her friends for her food talent.
My sis-in-law tried for years to sneak mushrooms (and later cilantro) into foods she served me. I guess she figured if I just "tried" them I would finally realize how good they are and my life would be so much better and she'd be the hero or something. Why couldn't she understand I *had* tried them (long before she came into my world) and that's how I knew I don't like them? Why couldn't I have my own preferences? I did always find them, and pick them out (or not eat at all) which amazed her but she never learned. All it did was make it unpleasant, so I didn't trust her, and lost respect for her as well. Stopped visiting (maybe that was her point?). However, when my daughter went veggie she was very accommodating and kind. On the other hand we spent little time there by then so she didn't have much chance to sabotage.
Speaking of which, I spent years trying to convince the ex™ I wasn't his enemy which he would say he knew only to find out he felt I was trying to sabotage him (like if I was late, for getting held up; he thought I did it on purpose to ruin his life) so felt he needed to not just get back at me but punish me. Not even to get me to not do something again because he never admitted till the end he was doing any of it on purpose and in fact he was still taking revenge for minor "trespasses" upon him a decade before. The thing is, it wasn't really about me. He'd have done the same to someone else. He was trying to give me his own pain somehow. Of course that doesn't work for anyone involved.
Now, I celebrate the food itself. I figure if a new person in my life doesn't like what I make they either don't (and won't) like me or they can get what they need themselves (and hopefully let me know too so I can get to know them as well). But I won't give up myself anymore. If people don't like me for who I am, why would they like me for who I'm not? Further, why should I waste time with those who aren't going to like me when I could be free to find one that will?
Course I feel the same respect for the other person in that I won't waste their time sticking around if I'm not digging them. Only to get someone who's taken it so personally he's become increasingly unpleasant in forcing himself upon my world (because dumb*ss is just so irresistibly attractive and sexy... /sarcasm). No kidding, he's taken to hanging at the Farmers Markets for me to show up then following me through a few feet away the entire time.
Sorry for the essay! :)
Sieseye at 10:08PM on 05/11/08
That's okay, Sieseye. Sometimes there's just a lot to say. :)
I'm actually a Libra. And yes - we do have our mood swings. But then again, each astrological sign has their particular focal points that are positive or negative.
Probably you just don't like this particular guy. Shame he has to ruin the good mood of the Farmer's Market by hanging around it.
Your notes about balance being missing so much today, particularly in food, are so true. But I do think that if one searches back through history, the same lack of balance exists in some way, in some factors, with our food in an overall sense. Whether it was the historic factor of the better food going to the wealthy as it has for so much of time (still does, but we have a larger middle ground) or whether it be the issue of contaminants or ways to extend the amount of food there has always been something going on. So in that way I have to give a nod of the head to some sort of "progress".
Actually, this entire topic would seem to be something entirely astonishing and unbelievable to most people through times past - for pretty much the only thing that ran through their heads about food was: How do we get enough of it?! And of course: How can we make something delicious out of what is right in front of us? So in that sense, simply to be able to ask ourselves these questions posed by HeartofGlass is a very real gift. :)
Gordon Ramsay in real life has promoted women cooks to higher positions, so in that way one can be sure he's not a sexist pig. Ha, ha! Also the persona on TV is pushed to the limits for entertainment value.
In my own experience I've seen both men and women be equally helpful, not helpful, able to perform or not able to perform in the kitchen. There is no one style that makes it work - but if the chef is able to work with people rather than doing the towering over them with a whip sort of thing it can definitely make the work more pleasant, just as in any sort of workplace with any boss or leader.
As far as people being turned off by the idea of vegetarianism there's two things. First, it's "different". People often do not respond positively to "different" just because it is different. No good reason, really. Just people being people. Secondly there's the self-righteousness that some vegetarians or vegans carry as their swords in life - pushing the idea forward like a merit badge that nobody really wants to see. That creates a feeling of not wanting to be interested or supportive among those not really all that interested in the idea in the first place.:)
The great thing is that as we do have the gift to be able to prioritize our food choices there's much more within food to discover in lots of ways - both in reality and in how and what we think of it conceptually.
And it is easier than people to figure out, thank goodness. There's a great quote by someone (too early in the morning to figure out who) that says "What I like about cooking is that if you put a chop in the pan, it will cook ."
So at least something in life is under control. Ha, ha!
Karen Resta at 6:58AM on 05/12/08
Karen,
Hope I didn't offend. Certainly not my intention. He was the first Libra I'd knowingly had much interaction with and I looked up his sign because he seemed so different. Balance seemed like a great thing to me but I had a different idea of it which I'd say is often how we have so many misunderstandings with people... though this guy seems to be special but not so much in a nice way and I'd say it has little to do with what time of year he was born (nor do I think he gives much thought to balance). The good thing (and I always try to find it) is I've change where I go and what I do (restaurants and stores also because he took those too) and I've found great new things I wouldn't have otherwise in my previous comfort zone.
I do know about vegangelicals too. I've encountered them myself and they are unpleasant (as is any extremism). However, I've also been attacked by non-vegetarians just for not eating meat. Accosted with the excuse being the vegangelicals; that they exist means all vegetarians should be harassed (to some people). In comparision the meat-eaters have been more vicious, tenacious and numerous but they aren't marginalized so people not only don't seem to notice when they are being mean, they join in. So, I usually tell the extreme veggies to back off and that they are doing more harm than good but I feel a little forgiving because they do feel intensely about their cause, just unable to understand how polarizing they are. But, it is exasperating to be attacked and be put under a microscope for my every action and lifestyle choice (what I feed my pets and what shoes I wear get examined for instance) because any "unpure" action by me is an ah-ha moment that releases them to not just continue what they were anyway (only now with permission vicariously via me) but also to attack me for the way I live and the choices I make even though it seems to be their own insecurity and issues and because they were nosey and poking around my plate. Sounds personal but it happens to a lot of vegetarians/vegans. It was something I had noticed before switching myself and while never joining in never paid much attention let alone stood up to it. However, it's fresh on my mind this week between the Slate article (found thanks to SE) and some related classes I took this weekend. While there are a lot of issues beyond animal treatment what I'm most intrigued in is how and why people do what they do. Motivations.
It also surprises me how much we do when we don't know the whole story (or sometimes even more than a fraction). I used to look on in admiration to those who said we don't regret what we do as much as what we don't do. But, I think what I regret most is what I've done without knowing why.
I'd rather spend time with Gordon Ramsey than most people as despite being a bit confrontational he's quite together -- just wouldn't let him cook for me. :)
As far as different... I do understand. I felt that way too when I considered going veggie even though I was unhappy not being one. I'm finally discovering Indian food in all it's glory. It's so amazing but felt so strange for so long. I realize now it's because I so dislike cilantro but now I know I don't have to put it in when I prepare it. My regret is not doing this sooner. Another tradition busted. :)
Thanks, I've enjoyed the conversation and exploration.
Sieseye at 2:45AM on 05/13/08
I wasn't offended, Sieseye. I don't offend easily - it takes either chasing me around with ongoing attacks or else attacking someone else, to offend me. :)
Your comment But, I think what I regret most is what I've done without knowing why. is really apt to the question the topic posed. It's really good to think about the why's of the ways we do things, isn't it.
The lens of food is always an endlessly fascinating way to look at people and the world. :)
Now, off to make breakfast for two kids who like vastly different things to eat! Hah!
Karen Resta at 7:06AM on 05/13/08