• Share:
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Are you OK with the implications of grocery shopping at Wal-Mart?

A lot of folks object to Wal-Mart and its practices, but others can't pass up the low prices. What's your take on grocery shopping there?

Comments are closed: 84 Comments:

I won't go near the place. Everyone makes their decisions, and that's a line I've drawn. I totally go the other direction from corporate, and do most of my buying at a local organic co-op, direct from an organic free-range rancher, and from farmer's markets.

If I had the choice, financially, I'd not go there. Not only because of ethical concerns, but because shopping there is a nightmare.

Luckily, my local (well, it's a Texas-based chain with locations in Mexico) grocery is fairly close to Wal-Mart prices. But I imagine it's not all that much more ethically sound. (They do have their fancy store with locally grown and organic produce, but it's vastly out of my budget.)

It's only those weeks were every dollar and quarter matter that I'd drive the extra distance to Wal-Mart (there's a tradeoff, too, but they also have the cheapest gas) just for the food. Especially because their produce sucks anyway. It's not possible to get more than 2 days, 3 max ahead, because it is lousy to begin with and goes off at a frightening speed.

If it's a really tight week, I'll look for chicken there, but their seafood totally sucks too (all farmed and shipped from Asia).

So usually, it's not really the grocery budget that pushes me to Wal-Mart; it's everything else: toiletries, toilet paper/kitchen towels, school supplies, OTC medicines, batteries, etc. that makes me wind up there. And once there, I'll get the non-perishables.

I'd love to try farmers markets, too, but it doesn't make sense to me to drive 20 miles when--especially this time of year--there's not a lot of produce there anyway. Brownies and all kinds of already prepared foods tend to dominate, and even if I wasn't on a student budget, I still wouldn't pay $5 for a single brownie.

I do not buy meat or produce there. The veggies are sub standard in quality and the meat is scary looking. I will however buy various and sundry staples. I have to shop at Walmart because I live in Penciltucky. I make a trip to Wegman's once a month. I buy local produce as local as I can.
The reason why I shop there is because the local population is mainly employed by Walmart. They are the biggest employer in my county and local area. People have people to feed and clothe. The wheel goes round and round.
Walmart supercenters/Neighborhood Market will and have put local grocery stores out of business. I forsee Walmart giving a lot of local grocery stores a good hard shove. Not always for the better.
http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1540,1633189,00.asp

In this lousy economy, there really isn't much choice but to shop where your dollar will buy you the most - within reason. I don't buy meat at Wal-Mart, simply because it is not of the quality I desire. Why should I pay double for things like bathroom tissue and canned goods? If other stores didn't price themselves into the stratosphere, I'd shop at them.

When a Super Target opened near where I work, I was thrilled. I grabbed a cart, puffed out my chest (proud I wasn't shopping at Wal-Mart) and got on my way. "They want HOW MUCH for that? And where's the store brand??" I knew my efforts were doomed when I started to say, "I'll buy some items here and stop at Wal-Mart on my way home." I realized I was planning to make two separate shopping trips which was an unacceptable waste of my time. I circled the store in search of at least one item I knew I could not find at Wal-Mart for less. Dejected and defeated, I parked my empty cart at the door in Target and sighed to myself, "I'm never going to get out of Wal-Mart."

I live in Minneapolis - its against MN state law to shop at Walmart (kidding). Within a 5 mile radius of my house I have a coop, a corner grocery, a Trader Joes, a WholeFoods, a butcher, a Lunds, a Target, and a Byerlys. Within 8 miles there is a Costco. There is no Walmart. And Target doesn't offer the cost savings to shop there just for food. I only experienced walmart for the first time a few years ago I my first thought was "why in all the world would someone shop here?" when you then realize its the only retailer in that town. Put simply if either Target or Walmart offers the prices and the convenience - people will go there. One of those people won't be me.

I'm not sure what practices you're referring to. There are so many practices by every single business in the world (including farmer's markets) that I can't find the time to keep up with them all in their latest contortions.

I do know that the place frightens me. If we're going on "first reactions" my first reaction to the place when I drive up to it is that I feel as if I've walked on to a set of a science fiction film where humans have become strange and distorted into ugly almost unrecognizable shapes. Some of them don't walk anymore, they drive around in little carts loading the front of the cart with snack food in between stopping at the pharmacy for their prescriptions. Then two thoughts come into my mind: "I don't want to be like these people" and "I don't want to be around these people". Rude perhaps on my part? But true.

Studies report that it takes twenty-five subsequent good impressions to erase a first bad impression. That has never happened to me at Wal-Mart for the same scenario plays out each time.

When I'm around a group that does not appear to be the sort of person I want to be, I want to get out of there for it feels like I might "catch it". That is Wal-Mart, for me - aside from whatever their "practices" are. The people there (not all but many) are scarier than any corporate practice could be.

I go there to find electronics things, paper goods, all the trash one needs for daily life today. I can not understand what on earth that stuff is that they call meat and feel sorry for those that must struggle with cooking it. The vegetables and fruits once in a while can be decent but it's like finding a needle in a haystack. Once something good has been found I gloat, gleeful that I've saved a few cents on something after walking through the outerspace-like terrain of the store through the aliens.

That said, I've lived in rural areas where driving half an hour to Wal-Mart beat anything closer to town for food quality. It was a beacon of bright happy light in those places and again, nobody cared about the practices - in that case because comparatively it was better than what had been there before.

Once upon a time I said I'd never buy my groceries in the same place I could buy automotive oil and underwear.

But then my husband was laid off for four months, and every penny was spoken for several times over. It was very difficult for me to reconcile with shopping for groceries at WM- there's just so many reasons not to. But when it matters financially- I really have no choice. With a family to feed and care for, I can't be squeamish about where I buy my groceries.

However, in the same breath, I have no problems shopping at Sam's Club. Maybe that's because we don't have any competition for that type of store where I live?

I won't shop there at all. I guess I'm lucky to live in an area with many alternatives and very few wal-marts.

Perhaps this is an anomaly, but in my town, there are grocery stores with lower prices and higher quality than WM. I know there is all kinds of talk about why its morally abhorrent to shop there, but when it comes down to it, they don't have what I want, the parking is atrocious, I can't stand the line-ups and the prices don't make the hassle worthwhile, especially when I can drive to a grocery store just as close and get in and out in twenty minutes with everything I want! Maybe I'm just spoiled.

"I'm not sure what practices you're referring to."

These practices are very well documented. Here is a link.

For people who are tight with income, it is understandable to seek out the best prices, but you must realize that these prices come at a HUGE hidden cost, that you are likely paying dearly for simply by having a Walmart in your community, even if you yourself dont shop there. Other businesses charge more for the same products because Walmart, as the largest buyer in the US, can pressure its suppliers to sell below cost. The result is small businesses are forced to close down and lay off their employees.

Erika, your husband was laid off for a while. Think of the thousands of people who were laid off because Walmart put them out of business. By shopping at Walmart, you are basically enslaving yourselves and your communities to a corporation. Then look at the wage disparity between the lowest paid workers and the highest paid "worker" and you will see that my use of the term slavery is not misplaced.

I boycott ALL the big stores, unless it is absolutely necessary to shop there. I would rather spend a few more dollars knowing that the employees are being treated and paid fairly, that I will have local stores in town instead of having to go to a strip mall on a highway, and that I am NOT feeding a corporate beast that does not have anyone's interests at heart (not their workers, their suppliers, the security of the country, local community economies, the environment, or their consumers) other than those of their board of directors and biggest shareholders.

NO! I avoid Wal-Mart at all costs. Luckily I have many alternatives to shopping there.

While watching the documentary, Walmart: the High Cost of Low Price, I cried. I was living in rural Pennsylvania at the time, a place where Walmart is one of the few shopping options. I swore it off and found, even though I was paying a little more shopping elsewhere, I felt better and I was spending less! Spending less because every time I would go into Walmart I couldn't help picking up the $2 cute glass ramekins, and the .99 socks, and the $5 tank top, and...

That said, although I have cut down drastically, I would estimate, I still find myself there once every 3-6 months. I might feel really broke. Or, I might need such a variety of things, that I get lazy and seek the one-stop experience. But the groceries are horrible. I always feels dirty after I leave there, and even more so if I buy groceries, because I try to value what I put in my body. Food that comes from a huge mega chain that hawks crappy, chemically, processed food to low-income people just feels yucky. Even though they're getting into organic now. They'll do ANYTHING to make a buck. Anything. I'm happy that more people will be able to afford healthier food, but I'm also torn, because at what cost does that come?

Ugh. I always end up in this gray area when I think about Walmart.

My easy answer: I try to avoid it as much as possible, and I'm usually successful.

Seyo, beautifully put.

I understand what you wrote, Seyo - yet in the rural area I lived in when a Wal-Mart was added it did not put anyone out of business, the two tiny crappy grocery stores with bad meat and rotten vegetables are still there as is the grim Dollar Store with the products that break after four days and even the thrift shops are still in business as are the auto parts stores etc.

It did, however, put people to work in an area where few jobs were to be had and where even those low salaries are much desired as opposed to no salary at all. And the quality of food offerings was higher.

Wal-Mart actually allowed some people who I knew when I lived there to go to the dentist, to get their cars fixed, and to dream of bigger things than being a cashier though to be a cashier at Wal-Mart was a prize for them, and it allowed them to bring home better things to eat (and fresher) than were available to them previously.

To me it is not cut and dry, evil vs. good.
It certainly is not a beautiful thing, but in lieu of any one else going in to offer anything in these sorts of places it is something.

I'd beg on the streets before I'd spend a dime at Wal-Mart

For most people, depending on where they live, options available, and financial circumstances, this is not an "all or nothing" proposition.

Personally, I try and suport local businesses, but understand that people appreciate large selection and low prices too. Since Wal-Mart came to my region, (200 miles from a major metro area), many local stores have upgraded their product lines and services to remain competitive. Others have fallen off, or even closed, which probably was inevitable anyway?

We have choice. That's what's important. Choices change with the times, and we try to keep up.

When it comes to food, remember that once upon a time farmers and herders threatened the hunter-gatherers' way of life.

I can afford to support my local markets, grocery stores and butchers. Wal-mart be damned!

I work for a major company that supplies numerous goods to Wal-Mart. When they say jump you don't even ask "How high?". You just start jumping and don't stop until they tell you it's ok. They make my work life miserable a couple times a year so I boycott them out of principle. The only attraction is the convenience factor. I agree that the meat is horrible (is it me, or does the beef have an ungodly red tint to it?) and don't think the produce is all that fabulous.

Beyond the food quality, I can't stand the people-- the people that shop there with their 5 screaming kids or the people that work there and act like they'd rather be somewhere else. I have had mostly positive experiences with customer service at local stores, but the Husband's co-worker has vowed to never darken their doorstep again after an incident with the automotive department.

I think the company has good points and bad points, but the bad outweighs the good in my book.

I don't shop at Walmart, and I consider myself very lucky to be able to make that choice even though I live on a very limited income and have enough debt that makes sleeping scary,

But all this talk about being afraid of the people, or disliking them, or suggesting that they are a disease to be avoided makes me sad. I understand being upset by poor customer service or by poor parenting or seeing actual physical abuse, but as the information in seyo's link makes clear, these places can bring out the worst in people already in very difficult situations.

People who work and shop at Wal*mart do not deserve derision but courtesy and respect even when it is the most difficult and hope that other opportunities can be made available.

In my own discussion the "being afraid" of the people was tongue-in-cheek. But not exactly.

Every person gets courtesy from me no matter how they look or how they act or who they are, in equal amounts. Actually I give the average person on the street equal courtesy as any "celebrity" I've ever met, and not everyone can say that. Every person gets respect too, in the areas in which respect is due in my own mind.

I find that I can not have as much respect or admiration for those who treat their bodies as if they were a trash pile to be added to. I believe that being grossly overweight is often a choice rather than something that could not be changed - and I believe that poor grooming is slightly deplorable at the least in the ways of health but moreso in the ways of self-respect, and I believe that if foodies can separate the stylish foods and the foods that are more attractive and gorgeous than other foods (which is what foodies do) then in terms of deciding what is beautiful or not I guess I do it with people and how they choose to present themselves. After all, they have more choice than the average apple does.

And there are a lot of really grossly overweight very poorly groomed people going into the Wal-Mart's I've seen, in noticeable amounts. I'm sorry it is that way, but that does not stop it from seeming bizarre to me. Whether it is a Wal-Mart style thing or whether it is an economic thing I have no idea. I tend to believe it is a little bit of both.

I guess a similar discussion could be had about Whole Foods, or even The French Laundry.

Places do have styles in terms of the people they attract. And to each, their own. I don't think Wal-Mart style should be sacred in terms of discussion.

If Wal-Mart were the last food store on the face of the earth, I would become anorexic.

Wall-to-wall crap. If Wal-Mart were the last food store on earth, I'd become anorexic.

I can't do it; I refuse on principle. I took the future mother-in-law once because she likes it...I agree with the "feeling dirty" experience. My cousin buys socks there...that's all, just socks. He can not explain why he can't buy socks at Target or any where else he shops, but there it is.
When small local businesses like ours hang in there and do what they do best, they make it. If they continue to have a "take it or leave it" attitude or think cutting prices to levels they can not afford just to "compete", they don't make it, which is as it should be.

Seyo, I don't know whether you know it or not, but the link you provided leads to a site that is owned and operated by a labor union. I believe this disqualifies it as a reliable source of "well-documented" information about Wal-Mart's practices. In fact, I would argue that its "facts" are extremely biased, designed to fuel the controversy, and to further the agenda of an entity that has many interests, but none that are truly about saving the world from Wal-Mart. I would encourage anybody who is interested in learning more about this subject to seek out a broader spectrum of sources.

So many here have indicated they feel Wal-Mart is a gray area for them. That's because, like virtually every issue in life, Wal-Mart is not black or white.

Personally, I can't stand Wal-Mart and I only go there when I feel I have no choice. That decision has nothing to do with politics or ethics or economics. Like so many here, I simply hate going there. I dislike the people I encounter, I despise the physical plant, and if what I need is sold there, it's usually not at a low enough price to make the unpleasantness worthwhile for me.

Then again, I definitely don't represent the target demographic. I'm very blessed to be quite financially comfortable, and to live in an area with countless shopping options. On the other hand, I have family members who are THRILLED to have a Wal-Mart nearby. Do they like shopping there? No way. They hate it. But they live in remote, rural communities, so having a Wal-Mart in town saves them a roundtrip of two, three or more hours to "the city" for shopping. Wal-Mart provides local options, in terms of both products AND price savings, that they never had just a few years ago. It fills a niche that no other big retailer has ever tried to fill. Wal-Mart in their communities offers employment that provides supplementary income for seniors, close-to-home work for teenagers, and reduced welfare rolls. Almost all of these people would earn minimum wage no matter where they work. Many of them prefer to work only part time. They all want to work close to home. Before Wal-Mart, these options didn't exist.

Many of the "practices" that are so frequently used to illustrate Wal-Mart's badness are actually symptoms of much bigger issues in this country. Symptoms of issues that this one company did not create and can't be expected to solve. The illness is not called Wal-Mart.

Wal-Mart is a business. It exists to make money. As with virtually every business in this country, it attempts to squeeze every penny of profit it can out of its market. In doing so, it also crosses lines, as is also true of most American businesses (including the smallest ones). If you think Wal-Mart is the only one, or that only "big" corporations do bad, or that all corporations are evil, I'm sorry, but you are truly naive. And if you're going to boycott Wal-Mart on principle, I hope you're prepared to also stop relying on fuel, wearing Levi's, taking medications, etc.

I'm not a fan of Wal-Mart. But I do believe in using common sense and trying to look all the shades of gray in a very big picture. Corporate welfare, farm subsidies going to agri-businesses, special interest pork programs, a healthcare crisis caused employer-paid third-party coverage, artificially inflated wages... I'd spend more time looking at the root issues and less time worrying about whether Wal-Mart is evil.

So Karen, "everyone" gets your respect except those who are, in your opinion, too fat or too poorly groomed?

And I thought I was the only one who disliked shopping at Wally World! I do shop there about once a month, but only in the early morning or late at night. The crowds and long lines keep me away the rest of the time.

Karen did you ever go to a Carrefour? I used to grocery shop at Carrefour in the late 80's before hammered the company with union junk and they pulled up and walked. The Philly Carrefour is now a Walmart. Carrefour was by far larger and more impressive than any Walmart. The baguettes were amazing.
I don't know how bad it was for them but I loved shopping there. That was surreal. Walmart is pedestrian to me.
When it comes right down to it and where I live now I will shop there. As I said earlier not for meat or produce. If there were someplace else closer I would shop there too. It is a matter of what is close and contributing to the local economy, which here Walmart employs a lot of people and they have to eat too.

seyo and intheyearofthepig have said it perfectly. Thanks to both of you. I would add two thoughts. Why not Costco, if one is available to you? They treat their employees so well that Wall Street analysts are always after them to cut it out to increase profitability. And I have always heard that Americans will choose to save money on food whether they need to or not and before any other aspect of life. If this is true, why?
And another thought. People would not freely choose to put themselves into a condition that will earn them the contempt and discrimination of others.

I would LOVE to have a choice, but frankly, I live the "heart" of Wal-Mart country....about 12 min. from headquarters. We don't have a Whole foods or a Trader Joes....matter of fact there isn't one closer than 5-6 hours away. We have once local grocery chain other than wal-mart....all the others died out when I was a kid, but it charges twice, sometimes three times the price of wal-mart (as does the local natural foods co-op...even with a discount) and I simply can't justify the expense, not with three little mouths to feed. Not everyone can afford those kind of principals.

When you live out in the middle of nowhere, you take what you can get, grocery-wise. I'd love to shop at whole foods or wild oats or trader joes and nowhere else, but I just don't have that luxury. I can't justify the expense of gas, to drive 6 hours to shop. I do the best I can with what I have. I buy the freshest vegetables and fruits that I can and just because you go in a store that sells junk food, doesn't mean you're required to buy it. I can get in and out wal-mart with a pretty healthy cart actually.

And Karen.....wow, I don't really think your comment on overweight individuals is even close to appropriate. I think it was pretty offensive and way off topic.

Psychsarah, I'm hoping your comment to Karen was meant to be tongue-in-cheek since I think she made a number of really excellent, balanced points that indicate she doesn't feel that way at all.

You can treat people with respect and still not want to be like them or around them. Let's face it. If we're honest, we know exactly who she is talking about. I don't want to be around them either. I don't want to be around badly behaved well-to-do people either (and I encounter MANY of those!).

I know and like people across the entire socio-economic spectrum -- dirt poor to filthy rich, Mayflower descendants to illegal immigrants. I also know and DISlike a lot of people from these very same groups. They all receive the same degree of my respect they earn.

I'm so very grateful not to be a poor woman. I've been her -- to the point where I didn't know how I would eat, pay the rent or buy gasoline to get myself to one of my two full-time jobs. But I never wasn't clean and presentable and well-mannered. Ever.

On the flip side, I now qualify as wealthy by most people's standards, but I seriously doubt you'd ever guess it upon first meeting me. I believe that wearing your poverty OR your wealth like a big shiny badge, relying on it to excuse bad behavior, or using it like a get-out-of-jail-free card, is always distasteful. I don't want to be around those types of people, whether they're poor or rich.

Just be glad we have so many choices in this country. So many are lucky to have Wal-Mart as an option. I'm lucky to be able to choose NOT to shop there!

Until the economy improves, I have to hold onto as many pennies as I can. When things get better and more of the wealth is spread around, I'll seek out more "politically friendly" places to shop. This isn't a decision I'm comfortable making - but sometimes shopping at Wal Mart is a necessity - a necessary evil, if you will.

I lived in a town in SW Colorado with a tiny population. I had no choice but to shop in the next town. Until Wal-Mart opened, the local supermarket would charge a premium for food because they knew they could (they had NO other competition...zero). That wasn't true once Wal-Mart arrived. They got their prices in check in a big fat hurry.

Believe me, I'm not happy about the effect Wal-Mart has on mom & pop businesses but they deliver a product to a public that obviously needs them, or they would cease to exist.

I don't care if it means spending more, I won't shop in Wal-Mart for anything. Don't like their forcing jobs out of the country, their corporate philosophy or their 'Amway' style of motivation.

I would starve before entering a Wal-Mart. One alternative is Costco. The average floor employee at Costco earns more than $17/hour and has health care 91% covered by the company. Also, the founder and CEO of Costco only pays himself $350K/year, which, while still a bundle, pales to the CEOs of just about anything else.

I'm curious, a poster above wrote "I boycott ALL the big stores, unless it is absolutely necessary to shop there."

What would necessitate that? I'm not clear what is essential for life such that one would need to shop at a "big store." Ultimately it seems to come down to a combination of price, convenience, product selection, some consideration of something to do with a conception of corporate ethics....but if you dial in the right combination most people's objections to particular stores melt away.

(With the exception of some like Dughis, above this post, who stated his or her view unequivocally.)

Doesn't Costco cost like $60 or more a year just for the privilege of shopping there? I've heard they have some good food, but that's on the goat cheese/whole beef tenderloin sort of level.

Let's be honest and admit that it's not a viable substitute as a regular grocery store for people who buy their food at Wal-Mart. In my city, there are only 2, and they are by the more upscale and fairly remote suburbs.

Did anyone else totally love that Wall-Mart South Park episode?

No. WalMart-ization of food is evil. Talk about losing any connection with where your food comes from! Sigh.

I go to Costco once a month as well. You cannot grocery shop there unless you have a freezer or you have a lot of people to feed. I buy beef there but not poultry. They recently changed their packaging on the chicken and I don't like it.
Costco is 50.00 for a regular membership or 100.00 for a business membership which returns 2 percent per year in the form of a gift check.
Only one person needs to pay the 100.00 then the rest of the down line pays 50.00. I also go to Trader Joes once a month. In all honesty I cannot shop at just one grocery store ever, just not possible to get everything I need.
As for fat people they come in all economic levels just like people come in all degrees of tolerances and prejudices. I don't think any of that was germane to the topic. I see drunk people going to liquor stores.....
Karen is a unique person and her take on things is her take. I will agree to disagree since I am on a baking marathon and I have 3 kinds to go!!!!

Thanks to Karen for hangin' it out there- working out her pros & con's on wal-mart, human sociology/behavior, for all of us to see. I respect her for being honest and demonstrating through her statements the world ain't black & white - just shades of grey. Also nice work LoCo.

p.s. I'm not a big fan of Wal-mart, tend to avoid it, but still go ocassionally. I tend to spread my shopping out- in the summer I buy produce from a farmer who opens a farmstand on my corner, we don't own a sam's or costco card, but I do like Target. Most of my groceries are bought at a local asian supermarket, and a local middle-eastern market (best produce& feta around if the farmer's not there!) I live in the "less expensive"suburb's & feel lucky to have amazing options like these. I feel like I have way more non-corporate options than my hipsterfriends in Denver"proper"- which is always cool when they say I live in the "ghetto". Isn't it odd how socioecomonic status plays such a big part on how we see & react to things?

The question was "Are you okay with the implications of grocery shopping at Wal-Mart?".

Part of my answer was based on the fact that I do not consider shopping at Wal-Mart to be a healthy experience in many ways, and many of the people that I see there exemplify that fact to me.

In polite conversation discussion of the grossly obese in todays world is generally avoided, true. It is not politically correct to discuss it. Probably because of how obesity is growing in our culture at such a fast pace.

It may be offensive to some that I mention that those who are grossly obese offends me. Sorry. But I will say it anyway because I am tired of tip-toeing around the issue. The issue is health and the foods we eat and the culture we live in that somehow is producing more gross obesity with the health problems that do go along with it.

It does have to do with food, what we eat, whether we end up being grossly obese and unhealthy or whether we do not (along with many other factors). Therefore it is not off-topic. If the people who are shopping at Wal-Mart have a standard of obesity that is higher than it appears to be at other places one can buy groceries, why? Why?

I don't know. I do know that again, it is frightening to me. Could be it's partly about beauty. Could be it's partly about "class" but really to me I do not think so, for I truly do discount that in people as to who they "really" are. So to me, what it is - is that Wal-Mart is unhealthy in some basic way.

That's just what it looks like to me. And that it appears to be a trend that I have no personal taste for distresses me, and yes. I will say it.
Wal-Mart is not evil. But something about what it is or what it represents? I'm not okay with those implications. It's not economic. It's cultural, the implications I dislike.

If you want to look at it from outside the culture, consider the term "The Ugly American" (something I do not truly believe in). The "Ugly American" is big, fat, loud, and ignorant in the eyes of the rest of the world. If I had not already decided that the Ugly American really does not exist I might be tempted to believe in it after a few visits to Wal-Mart.

That makes me sad. A bit angry, too.

oh before anyone hops on it -I don't have anything against costco/sam's There's only 2 of us- we just don't need bulk items.

Wal-Mart arouses strong passions.

One should not forget one of the most e-mailed topics ever here on SE - The Custom Cake from Wal-Mart .

And yes, I did see that South Park episode. It was a beaut. :)

I have a really small freezer (in a rented apt), so Costco grocery shopping is not an option for me, but I think if I had a chest freezer - make that a larger pantry as well - it might work. They have a wide range of foods, just not in manageable sizes for someone in my situation. I'd much rather spend my money there than Walmart. I do admit that I go to Walmart once every few months to stock up on one cleaning item I cannot find anywhere else in Toronto (some things are just not readily available here like in the States, and I'm used to using it - spoiled, perhaps). But if I could find it elsewhere I would stop. Walmart is not the only option for inexpensive shopping here, by a long shot. It's just the easiest.

Where I live Wal-Mart is the best option to get the best food I need for several of my recipes. The county in North Carolina that I live in is dominated by Food Lions ever since Winn-Dixie filed for bankruptcy and closed several of its North Carolina stores. The alternate choices--a lone Piggly Wiggly and a lone IDA--are even more inferior than the Food Lion monopoly. Although I am aware of and hate Wal-Mart practices, I prefer to shop there to get exactly what I need for my recipes.

LOL! I love that custom cake.
-nuff said on wal-mart.

So Karen, "everyone" gets your respect except those who are, in your opinion, too fat or too poorly groomed?
psychsarah at 1:58PM on 12/12/07

Nope, not everybody, psychsarah. I will show respect but hold little of it within myself for knaves or fools. And in my later years I actually outwardly show no respect at all for those who lie, cheat, and steal. I'll actually do my best to diss them to their face.

But in the category you mention above I may find compassion within me for the people who exhibit those specific behaviors and will show respect outwardly to those that exhibit them but inwardly, no - I can not respect those behaviors unless extreme circumstances warrant it, in my mind. If we are what we eat then I have to wonder what is going on when those behaviors are exhibited in people. What are they eating?

LoCo, all the facts listed in that page are researched and verified by outside sources. They are FACTS. These are not opinions or accusations, they are again verfiable FACTS quoted from sources such as Business Week, The Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, US Government Census Data, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and on and on and on... DID YOU EVEN READ ANY OF IT?

Yes, the page is run by a labor union, because labor unions are among those who directly confront these corporations on these issues. The government can't be counted on to behave ethically. Walmart has an extremely influential lobby group. The only way to make sure that corporations such as Walmart behave ethically is for people to get the word out and for workers to organize themselves. Thats what they are doing.

To me, Walmart is not at all a case of shades of gray. They are evil, pure and simple. Costco is a shades of gray type of place. So is Starbucks. To answer the question, what would make a purchase at a Big Store (Walmart, Best Buy, Home Depot) necessary, to me it would be only if what I needed was not available elsewhere.

And for those of you saying that it is wonderful that we have the abundance of choice in the first place, yes I agree with you, but Walmart is actively striving to limit that choice every day they are open for business. I dont want to contribute to their master plan, because I am opposed to their business model, which is similar to that of a swarm of locusts.

This is the shade of grey sort of thinking that allows "Big Stores" to thrive. There's nothing that is "needed" that must come from a Big Store. There are things people want, certainly, but what on earth is sold at Best Buy that is essential to live? There's no significant need in that store. It may be that they have things one can't get elsewhere, or have them cheaper or closer...but those are exactly the decision points that the Big Stores are predicated on. The choice to shop at one is based on wants, usually. I don't necessarily have a problem with that, but it's disingenuous to claim that it's only based on "need."

I avoid Wal Mart in general. But I do sometimes buy nuts there - I don't know where else to find huge amounts for so cheap. And a sad confession - Sam's Nature Path trail mix is my absolute fave. I can't find another one with the same mix that doesn't contain chocolate.

Well, I am 7 minutes from Walmart that is being converted to a Super Walmart. I dont love the crowds, the blocked aisles, shitty parking or the screaming kid in aisle 9 because his mother won't buy the bloody reese cup.

However, when it comes to household items, (TP, paper towels, dawn, tin foil, soap, shampoo, garbage bags, dog food, etc.) I can't beat the price. Locally, a 17lb bag of Kibbles and Bits at Target is 12.59. Walmart has it for 8.88. The giant Tide is $13.88 at Walmart. Target is 16.99.

I know all the horror stories about Walmart, I don't buy any "food" there except sams choice flavored waters (.50 each) and Act II microwave caramel corn. I stick to household and toiletries, occasionally socks/underwear and clearance summer clothes for my every growing niece.

For the price and the super strict budget Im on right now, thats my choice. When things get a little better financially for us, I will go to Target and whatnot.

Yeah, im the odd man out. Walk a day in my shoes...

intheyearofthepig: a voice of reason in the wilderness.

I don't shop at WalMart, but it has nothing to do with the "style" of their customers and staff. I'm outraged, so I'd better end it at that.

If I gotta think about implications just to put some decent food on the table...wait a minute, if you gotta think about implications...you got way more time on your hands than I do! And less of a life!

But NO, I usually won't shop for food from Walmart...

...cook, chef, culinary sponge, traveler, volunteer, missionary.
tyronebcookin


I used to shop at Ghetto-Mart all the time - thinking that I was saving money on everyday items, clothing, toys, etc. But in the end, those cheap things that I bought never lasted for more than a few months and I'd have to replace them, spending even more money.

But I do still shop there - when you have 2 kids, after school activities, limited time and a budget - one stop sometimes is worth it.

No, I am not OK with the implications of shopping at Walmart, which is precisely why I don't ever set foot there. I agree that Walmart is pure evil, and I certainly would not support them by spending my money there. I guess we're lucky to have plenty of shopping options in the area (Jersey Shore) to not even think of Walmart as an option, but I honestly don't think I (or my husband, for that matter) would ever consider it an option anyway. My in-laws, on the other hand, do shop there from time to time, which makes me cringe (I cannot judge people who simply can't afford shopping anywhere else, or who need to take a 6-hour round trip otherwise, however, neither is the case with my in-laws), but cringe is all I can do since I can't impose my principles on them.

The thing about style is that people buy based on it, or don't buy based on it.

And it exists in all things. In food. And in people.

If I don't like Wal-Mart's food style, I have a right to not like it.

If I don't like a person's particular style, I have a right to not like it.

If style were not taken into consideration (style or "presentation") in things done by humans, we might all be eating the same foods and they might not be all that great - for reaching for style, reaching for "something better" or something finer or something different - that sense of being creative - is what is at the base of every great recipe any one knows. Reaching for something that looks and tastes good.

Everybody has a recipe of their own they write for their lives.

I don't have to like all of them.

And honestly, not all of them are bound to be all that successful in general or admired by the general public all that much in general.
And that is why certain styles and certain foods are aspired to by most people.

Reality vs. what we pretend to be like. There's a gap.

Wal-Mart advertises on television - its ads look a certain way.
Take that ad and then film the place and set them side by side.
If they want to sell what they are, then why not run the film that shows the reality? Would that get people in the door and buying?

Karen did you ever go to a Carrefour? I used to grocery shop at Carrefour in the late 80's before hammered the company with union junk and they pulled up and walked. The Philly Carrefour is now a Walmart. Carrefour was by far larger and more impressive than any Walmart. The baguettes were amazing.
I don't know how bad it was for them but I loved shopping there. That was surreal. Walmart is pedestrian to me.
When it comes right down to it and where I live now I will shop there. As I said earlier not for meat or produce. If there were someplace else closer I would shop there too. It is a matter of what is close and contributing to the local economy, which here Walmart employs a lot of people and they have to eat too.
JerzeeTomato at 2:12PM on 12/12/07

Carrefour is a French company , Jerzee Tomato - I didn't even know they had them here. I've been to them in France.

The best grocery store I've been to in the US was a Harris-Teeter in NC. It really was almost like a Fresh Market without the haute attitude. It was simply excellent. Prices mid-level, food excellent and added touches like free balloons for small children and free cookies and coffee too. The balloons kept the kids busy, the cookies kept them happy to go through the store and the coffee made me feel cared for.

I agree with you about WM assisting the economy in certain areas of the country wholeheartedly.

One wonders why other companies do not go in to do the same, really. You know, the ones who are not "evil". Who are they I wonder.

P.S. Actually the "style" I don't like or respect that I see at Wal-Mart in the grocery aisles costs our economy huge sums lost annually in all sorts of ways and costs individuals directly larger health-care insurance charges (when they can get health insurance, that is, as more companies large and small do not want to provide it because the costs are so exorbitant so hire part-time in order to be able to survive or thrive in business) so it really is not "just" the style I dislike - it is the substance.

Is the substance evil too I wonder?

Or can that be excused as it is based on the individual and foods rather than the corporation and foods. Or does it finally come down to it is the big corporations who make the wrong foods that people somehow put in their grocery carts to eat out of choice but is it really a choice - do they have a choice or are they all gripped in the throes of the Evil Plan?

Funny you should talk about Harris Teeter. I don't like them in NC. It would be the store I would not go to. In NC (where our other home is) I shop Trader Joes, Fresh Market, Costco and Lowes Foods and not Walmart at all. The Raleigh area is not as rural as our house in Penciltucky and we have more choices. I do pick up some grocery items at Target Supercenter the prices are good in NC but the prices on everything else are bad. Go figure.
Carrefour was in Philly area from 1988-1993, some of the best grocery shopping memories I have. They even did double coupons which back then I needed. Baguettes were 1.50 each. My car had crumbs in it for years after.

When I lived in NC (or maybe where I lived) there were no TJ's or Fresh Market. Food Lion was the best alternate, and one place in NC there was a Piggly-Wiggly.

Here they traded out HT's for Kroeger's and that is about as good as it gets unless I drive close to an hour for Fresh Market which was built last year and now a new Ukrops around the corner from the Fresh Market. I'm not crazy about the prices at either and do feel that they do lead me into conspicuous consumption and buying of aspirational luxury items which finally when I get home I wonder why on earth I bought as many are rather useless in the real day to day business of making good healthy meals for family. I've started a section in my cupboard where all these things land so that when I need to impress someone (why bother I do not know but anyway) I can pull them out and act like the ultra-sophisticate which people do so love. I guess it's better than buying junky snack food at Wal-Mart though. Heh heh.

The most fabulous grocery store I ever went to looked like a dump on the outside and rather strange inside. It had two floors with an escalator going up to the second floor, huge high ceilings, a grand piano with a guy in tuxedo playing it, sawdust on the floors and the atmosphere otherwise of a barracks. It was in downtown Battle Creek Michigan and they had things like morels in season for the most incredibly cheap prices and a separate cold section for meats and dairy which you had to walk into with a coat on - it was a huge section of the store that had the temperature of a walk-in.
Bizarre place, great place. Can't remember the name of it - I think it was on its last legs when we lived there ten years or so ago.

LoCo-of course I was being tongue-in-cheek about Karen's comment. I didn't take issue with anything else she said, in fact, I agree with you that she made numerous good points. It just seemed that her comment said she respected everyone, but then said there was a certain class of people not deserving of her respect. It seemed contradictory to me. Take your comment that you can respect people and still not like to be around them, and imagine that we were talking about a certain ethnic group rather than a group of overweight/obese people. Just a thought...

Karen-I think you and I are both opinionated people, and I hope we can respectfully disagree about our opinions of overweight people. I think these lively discussions are great for everyone to challenge their thinking about complex issues that may seem simple on the surface, like where to shop. I find it fascinating that so many cultural and social issues are raised in a discussion of grocery shopping.

Me thinks thou doth protest too much, as thou looketh down thy beautiful patrician nose at the fat, poor, ugly plebes. Be afraid, be very afraid. Thou could falleth into the pit at any moment. Judge not lest ye be judged.

Bigotry, prejudice and hate are evil, in corporations and individuals..

ccweb, you are 100% correct. The vast majority of the stuff sold in the big stores is consumerist crap anyway, and 99.9% of it can be found at smaller individually owned stores. When I mentioned NEED, I meant it: for example, specialized tools or materials that the hardware store doesnt have, you have to go to the Home Despot for. I cringe whenever I have to set foot in that store too, thankfully my hardware stores are very well equipped, and I only find myself in a Home Despot once a year or so.

As far as food is concerned, I find it shameful that in a country as fertile and covered with farmland as ours, rural areas dont have at least adequate if not excellent outlets for fresh and high quality food at affordable prices. And guess who is to blame for the fact that there arent? Big corporations, corrupt government, and lazy uneducated consumers who sit back and wait for a mega store to arrive in their area rather than organize themselves and pressure their local government into action. Set up a food Co-op! Organize a farmer's market! There are solutions other than those being force fed to you by corporate America. Corporate america wants to give you the cheapest product and will attempt to exploit their workers as much as they possibly can.

Co-ops and farmer's markets arent elitist big-city only things, and they havent been around for ever either. In the 80's there was no healthy and high quality food to be found in the city, all we had were high end expensive specialty gourmet shops and regular crappy supermarkets. As well as you know the name Alice Waters (and you should), I'm sure no one knows of Hilary Baum, AN ACTIVIST, and it is largely thanks to her that we in New York have such great food choices today. No one came here and handed us a farmer's market, she organized them. The idea being that high quality food was being produced all around us, but wasnt getting to us at fair prices, with FAIR LABOR PRACTICES. If you arent a CEO or a Big Shareholder, then this matters to you.

I am not sure how exactly Walmart assists the economy. Granted, it's been a while since I got my degree in economics, so I may be rusty. Walmart hires a large number of people in the area, this seems like a good thing, right? But then, when instruction as to how to apply for food stamps and/or Medicare provided as a "welcome to Walmart" package for a new employee, it's not such a good thing any more, is it? By paying ridiculously low wages and providing inadequate health care packages (if any), Walmart essentially makes the welfare of the people employed by them somebody else’s responsibility. Somebody else being the government, which basically means that Walmart effectively increases taxes that you and I have to pay. Does it assist the economy? I seriously doubt that. Don’t forget that when a large group of people in a community has a very low income, it has a domino effect on the entire community – people who receive low wages spend less on goods and services in the community, which in turn lowers income of people who provide the said services, etcetera, etcetera. How does that assist the economy? And I am not even getting into the whole issue of huge tax breaks that Walmart gets everywhere they have a store – so while your taxes are likely to rise when a Walmart comes to your town, they will not pay a penny back. Walmart is good for the economy like cancer is good for the body.

psychsarah, I think it's great that so many issues fall inside the discussion of food also. To me, it's never "just" food.

As far as considering the comparison of obesity to ethnicity, I have considered it and for myself, as I believe that until proof is found that people are born obese and must stay that way - that their eating behavior has nothing at all to do with it or that for these people eating behavior is simply uncontrollable in any way by their own actions - ethnicity and obesity are not on the same page.

I don't "hate" fat people. People are more than the way they look. But I do take issue with unhealthy things that get in my face when I try to go grocery shopping. If someone could prove to me that gross obesity and the ill health that is at this point in time assumed to go along with it, costing many people both money and pain whether they are the ones doing it or not, was not unhealthy or was a positive force in the world, I'd not think the way I do. But right now, I see the more and more people who are becoming more and more grossly obese in our society the same as I would anyone exhibiting any other unhealthy behavior. I don't like to see it in our society and I'm not going to pretend to so that it can all be prettied up and ignored.

That I transposed it into "style" was at first a hopefully gentler or ironic way of saying it rather than to dig deeper. That was a mere brush of the pen. There's much more to discuss than style or what any person likes or not in this issue.

As time passes and healthcare costs increase for all individuals across the board due to this issue - when it starts affecting all people's paychecks it is to be imagined that it will become something more widely discussed (though of course there is information out there already in many respected news sources about the cost of obesity to the public).

Is gross obesity just something that someone "is"? That is your claim, psychsarah. I like to give human beings more individual powers than that in my mind.

Is gross obesity not harmful to anyone? Is it a good thing or just a passive non-hurtful thing?

Is gross obesity totally unlinked to eating behavior?

I'm sorry to have side-tracked the discussion this far. But when I think "Wal-Mart" and "implications of grocery shopping there" this is what comes to mind first. To me, what I see at Wal-Mart in terms of this category is not healthy.

I get upset seeing unhealthy things for some reason.

brooke29, I can't argue economics as a subject in depth. All I know is that I've lived places where there literally were no jobs for many people. As seyo writes above maybe they are the

lazy uneducated consumers who sit back and wait for a mega store to arrive in their area

I don't know. I do know that there were many people who did not have any sort of higher education in these areas and that small farming was basically the way people eked out a living, growing cattle. No, not organic cattle.

When Wal-Mart arrived the ones that were on welfare remained on welfare or assistance or maybe some of them got jobs there. Wal-Mart did not need to give them information on this sort of thing because this sort of thing is already well known about.

It did give some people jobs and a bit of self-respect in that they had jobs.

Did they then spend their money at Wal-Mart on all the lovely junky Wal-Mart things? Yes, of course. And those things were nicer to them than what was available in the area before, and as they were unlikely to drive hours to go to a larger shopping center due to lack of money for gas, that seemed great to them.

There really are some places in the world where choices are very limited.

Wal-Mart did not domino-effect these places into worse shape. It created industry for those that could not find it before, and it created a hope for the future that life would not be dead-end.

I know parents who took jobs at Wal-Mart who for the very first time in their lives in this place were able to start to save money for their children to go to college. I would not like to tell them that Wal-Mart was a destructive economic force.

Trader Joe's is on the same level of WalMart...just with shades of grey. Don't shop at either.....always lived in a place where Walmart didn't exist (until now). Stopped shopping at Trader Joe's when a baker friend told me what hoops they make him go through, similar to the below cost requirements of WalMart fame. After a little more research years ago.... Those wonderful frozen berries or whatever people love were picked by children in third word countries but I know....they are so cheap...& so on & so on

Ok Karen, I am not trying to jump on what you seem to see as a group attack, but just want to point out that you now seem to be referring to fat (and probably also poor) people as "things" that you don't even want to see when you go shopping. I don't think it's helping your argument.

Are there any high brow, upper crust pretentious establishments who keep out the riff raff, and cater to the young, healthy blue-eyed blonde beautiful people with celebrity friends and more money than they can possibly spend?

Perhaps that would make Karen comfortable. I sure hope you aren't a brunette, because the blondes wouldn't like to have to look at you while they shop.

Ha, ha! That's funny.

I think everyone knows I don't think of people as things, but if they don't any assurances from me will surely not persuade them.

I didn't want to argue in the first place but was drawn into it.

All I can finally say is that if people do not want to be thought of as things instead of as people they should try to remain in a recognizable human form rather than eating themselves into parodies of the Goodyear Blimp.

Now I'm done - no more arguments - whomever disagrees with me is surely as right in their mind as I am in mine. We're not in a court of law so there will be no legal and binding judgement passed down as to who is right or wrong. I will just have to fear what PerkyMac has mentioned:

Be afraid, be very afraid. Thou could falleth into the pit at any moment. Judge not lest ye be judged.

I'm off to muse on the pit and how if I do fall into it I might be able to get out. :)


I get upset seeing unhealthy things for some reason.
Karen Resta at 12:37PM on 12/13/07

That's where I said "things"?

I meant things. All unhealthy things. If I didn't add "and people" it was because I presumed I did not have to for clear understanding. :)

PerkyMac, I have had my share of judgement tossed down upon my by others for very many things in my life. I am not exempt from that nor am I perfect nor am I young blonde or rich. I don't tend to think of life as a nice little cozy place in general and that may show in my commentary. If you are offended I apologize but that will not alter what I will write.

I was referring to the first instance:
"But I do take issue with unhealthy things that get in my face when I try to go grocery shopping."

But for clarificiation, I know what you meant and I'm not trying to make an extreme point of it.

I think the most basic problem with the whole "Wal-Mart [and/or its offerings] is so terribly unhealthy" argument is that they sell almost the exact same stuff as any other regular grocery store (ie., not Whole Foods). There are many reasons for disliking/avoiding/hating Wal-Mart (many noted above), but the actual product offering don't count for me.

One last oh boy do I hope its the last comment I make. renzata, read what I wrote more closely about the poor. If it sounded like I thought less of them in any way then I wrote badly. I've been poor and I've also at times not been poor. I can assure you that being a fourteen year old who had to find a way to support herself alone without parental help due to the parent being rather amiss in ways would put one in the category of being poor. If you'd like to read about me being poor, to prove it here is a story at post #5 that includes both poverty and food. Actually the food is rather Wal-Mart like in style. Hah.

"All the facts listed in that page are researched and verified by outside sources. They are FACTS... DID YOU EVEN READ ANY OF IT?"

Yes, I actually did read it. My concern wasn't with whether they are all facts, but whether they are all the facts there are. You'll note that my advice was to seek out a broad spectrum of sources on the subject rather that to rely exclusively on a single biased one. As a professional researcher, it's my job to read many, many sources when investigating a subject. I am required to read critically and analytically, identify as many sides to an issue as possible, and rely on the most balanced, least biased sources. Absent an unbiased source, it is necessary to identify the best of the one-sided ones, attempting to ensure all sides of an argument are fairly represented. One biased source is nothing more than propaganda. Two differing ones make a fair debate. Consider a voice from the other side:
Working Families for Wal-Mart
Or this "unbiased" piece from the Foundation for Economic Education:
Wal-Mart Is Good for the Economy
And watch this PBS documentary, which attempts to explore both sides:
Is WAL*MART Good for America?

"And guess who is to blame ... Big corporations, corrupt government, and lazy uneducated consumers"

Well, at least we do mostly agree on that. Let me add labor unions to your list since, like it or not, a modern union is nothing more than another big business in bed with a corrupt government, sharing a sizable measure of responsibility for many of the Nation's current problems.

But the most important group on that list is the consumers (or voters, as the case may be). Caveat emptor. Or... If you behave like a doormat you're going to get walked on. Or... If you don't vote, you don't get to complain. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

"If you arent a CEO or a Big Shareholder, then this matters to you."

Wow. I hope I misunderstood your point. That sounds a lot like bigoted stereotyping, and leads me to suspect you've never actually interacted with any of "those" people. I live with a recently-retired senior executive of a Fortune 100 employer of more than 100,000 Americans. I assure you that it matters very much him and to the vast majority of his counterparts. Not only because they're human beings (not monsters), but because you'd have to be an idiot not to realize that there can be no bottom line without workers.

I can't tell you how many times my husband went to bat for the so-called little guy. And he did so quite successfully, I might add. Now that he's "retired" he's working as a (gasp) full-time investor (aka Big Shareholder). Shall he and his fellow investors give up their big shares? You don't even want to see where we'll all be if they all pull out and turn this already fragile economy to dust.

To those convinced of "pure evil" and "unfair labor" practices... well, I can think of many things that come much closer to the definition of evil than Wal-Mart. Serial killers, child molesters, Rwandan dictators... heck, even Enron executives come to mind. Is providing access to affordable food and necessities that bad? Is it an unfair labor practice to provide entry-level jobs to the thousands of inexperienced, difficult-to-employ workers who want them?

Bottom line: You don't have to like them, but please try to see the big picture. As an individual consumer, I strongly dislike Wal-Mart stores, and I'm glad to be able to choose not to patronize them. But, as a responsible and well-informed citizen of the REAL world, I recognize that, overall, its benefits far outweigh its evils.

karen, fat people drive the economy, they spend billions at fast food joints, billions on fad diets that never work and they keep the health care folks busy.

also, your are not at the top of my list of phoney people, your only about half way up the list.

...me being poor, to prove it here is a story at post #5 that includes both poverty and food. Actually the food is rather Wal-Mart like in style. Hah.

Wonderful stuff, Karen. I wish I could so eloquently phrase my own different-but-similar experiences. Thanks for sharing and reminding me!

This has been a fascinating thread. I'm anti-Wal-Mart. I can count on one hand the number of times I've been in a Wal-Mart and that is due to an active decision not to spend my money there.

I won't echo, but I will second many of Brooke29's reasons and will add the following problems that I don't believe have been mentioned:

1. Wal-Mart is notorious for not wanting to pay overtime. They will schedule their employees for work weeks that are not 40-hour weeks in order to avoid the possibility that an employee will need to work overtime. (By keeping people part-time, it also helped for a long time to keep many of its employees ineligible for company health care plans.) The company has also been sued in the past for forcing employees to work more than 40 hours, but having them clock out at the 8-hour mark, so that they don't pay O/T. I won't go into the litany of stories about this, but a quick Web search will pull them up. In addition, the top managers in each store receive sizable bonuses for keeping their yearly payrolls below a certain figure. That is why you often see Wal-Mart stores less organized/dirtier than some of their competitors. Their staffs are smaller and since so many of them are not full-time employees, they take less pride in their place of work.

2. Related to the payroll issue, when employees reach a certain hourly wage, the managers feel pressure to get those employees off the payroll. Since they cannot fire a person without cause, they start doing things like changing the employee's shift, lowering the number of hours for which they are scheduled, give them jobs that they cannot/do not want to do (i.e. a 60-year-old cashier is suddenly transferred to parking lot shopping cart collection duty), etc. The managers then become extremely inflexible when the employee asks for a "favorable" schedule. One of two things then happens:

a. The employee quits
b. The employee is fired for insubordination when they complain about the shift in hours, change in duties, etc.

This allows the company to keep payrolls low.

3. For those who say that Wal-Mart brings jobs to communities where there are none, often, this is a direct result of the way in which Wal-Mart does business. Wal-Mart is (I believe) the largest importer of Chinese products in this country. The products being made in China by factory workers who make several hundred dollars a year, are products that were formerly made by American employees in U.S. factories; factories that closed down because the were unable to compete with their Chinese counterparts. Wal-Mart's corporate culture of getting the lowest priced products onto the market comes at the expense of American jobs. Wal-Mart then comes in and pays minimum wage to factory workers who used to make four-to-five times as much, plus health care and a pension. The U.S. has a trillion-dollar trade deficit with China -- which, even those without a degree in economics know -- is bad for the U.S. economy and its long-term stability.

4. Finally, Wal-Mart is a socially-insensitive company. Some of you might be aware of the Nazi t-shirt scandal from last year, when it was discovered that the company was selling in its U.S. stores a shirt emblazoned with a totenkopf -- described by Wikipedia as "a military insignia featuring a skull above crossed bones. It is distinguished from the similar traditions of the skull and crossbones and the Jolly Roger by the positioning of the bones directly behind the skull. For a long time in widespread use in several countries, its association with aspects of Nazi Germany has led to its decline." It took several months for Wal-Mart officials to even agree to tell its stores to remove the shirt, and for more than a year after that edict came down from corporate the shirt was spotted on Wal-Mart shelves across the country. The company also had another Nazi-symboled t-shirt on sale several years ago that was removed. In addition, just yesterday (Wednesday 12/12/07). Wal-Mart removed "[t]he panties, which were sold in the juniors department, [which] seemed to suggest that girls don't need money, they just need a sugar daddy — in this case Santa Claus.The hipster briefs — carrying the slogan "Who needs credit cards ..." on the front and "When you have Santa" on the derriere — caused an uproar among parents, who called for the $2.96 drawers to be pulled off the racks."

I could continue, but this post is already long enough. Long story short, Wal-Mart is not just a bad company, those who support Wal-Mart by shopping there are hurting themselves, and the United States. You can find farmers almost anywhere. You can find farm markets almost anywhere. Wal-Mart organic is a crock (that has also been proven.) Don't be a sucker.

Wow. Perky Mac, in answer to your post above where it says:

Me thinks thou doth protest too much, as thou looketh down thy beautiful patrician nose at the fat, poor, ugly plebes. Be afraid, be very afraid. Thou could falleth into the pit at any moment. Judge not lest ye be judged.
Bigotry, prejudice and hate are evil, in corporations and individuals..
PerkyMac at 10:48AM on 12/13/07

I remembered one of your first posts regarding a meal someone described making for their Thanksgiving:

lola27: Different strokes for different folks, I guess, but......looks like your dogs and cats got the heaves, and the first dish looks like deceased frogs. Stomach was turning, so I couldn't read your blog, but I'm sure you enjoyed your meal and that's all that matters.
PerkyMac at 1:25AM on 11/24/07

.............................

karen, fat people drive the economy, they spend billions at fast food joints, billions on fad diets that never work and they keep the health care folks busy.
also, your are not at the top of my list of phoney people, your only about half way up the list.
olddad at 2:24PM on 12/13/07

olddad, I didn't realize you had a list. If it's published somewhere, I'd love to see it. It makes me feel quite important to be on it and I'll accept whatever placement you'll allow me there.

........................

Today I am off to support my local evil economy by picking up a few things at Wal-Mart. Shopping for a few things that is and viewing many other things and people - it's always free entertainment - in that way really it's a great deal. If I happen to chat with any other shoppers there I'll mention the concerns posted here so they will be aware.

I am very torn about continuing to comment on this thread.... On one hand, I just feel like dropping it, because as Karen said, we are all right in our own minds and this could go on forever, with people getting progressively nastier to one another. On the other hand, I'm loathe to think that my silence would be viewed as agreement, and I feel like I sort of started some of this discussion with my "tongue-in-cheek" comment.

So, while there are clearly differences between ethnicity and obesity, it was an analogy meant to promote broader thinking about the discrimination overweight people face. That said, there is much scientific debate regarding the genetics of weight, so it is possible that one day we understand that one's weight range is just as pre-determined as one's skin colour. Furthermore, there is scientific debate regarding whether being overweight is actually unhealthy, believe it or not. (Since the media only ever tells us the horror stories about the "obesity epidemic" most people never hear the other side of the coin).

Ok-I think I'm done. I'm trying hard to resist the urge to comment on the blimp analogy because it will only become inflammatory.

Happy holidays to all. Hopefully all of our holiday shopping will be more mindful and informed as the result of this discussion.

I've read a great number of books written by a variety experts (that would be doctors and scholars in the field who provide sources and bibliographies to assure credibility) from university libraries on the weight issue, psychsarah. And perhaps someday there will be discoveries that prove what you say above.

That does not change the fact that gross obesity has seen a huge increase in our society for the past twenty or thirty years or so - and that increase would not be something that is attached to genetic code, it would be something attached to something else that is going on.

Is it our hungry culture? Is it the cornsyrup? Is it lack of time to eat things that might not cause the same effect? Is it emotional need? Is it Wal-Mart?

I don't know. But I do know that in particular at Wal-Mart it shows up as it does in no other place I go to. I wonder at that.

In face-to-face encounters I assure you I am mindful and polite. But in writing and questioning what is going on at Wal-Mart and in our society I may not be so polite. I have not seen in any endeavor I've ever undertaken that being all nice and sweet actually had any effect on things except to make people think one is nice and sweet.

In other words, if you like sausages or politics you might not want to see how they are really made.

Welcome to my sausage factory.

Happy holidays to all too - and may your holidays (with or without massive shopping) be as joyful as life can give.

LoCo, are you out of your damn mind, or are you actually a Walmart lobbyist??? Working Families for Walmart IS A GROUP FOUNDED BY WALMART AND THEIR PR FIRM. That IS NOT an unbiased group, and they most certainly DO NOT represent the opinions and positions of working people.

Neither is the Foundation For Economic Education. They are a free-market, libertarian think thank whose mission is to promote deregulation of markets, and therefore side with large corporations who find any government oversight to be a hindrance. This includes regulation and enforcement of WORKERS' RIGHTS. The FEE is pro-capitalist and anti-regulation. Certainly NOT UNBIASED.

The PBS documentary does try to balance the views, but the overwhelming take away is that Walmart does more harm than good, and again the fact is that they have done and would continue to do much worse if they werent under such scrutiny.

Here is another non affiliated (neither union nor corporate) organization dedicated to pressuring Walmart to reform:

http://walmartwatch.com/

You are simply put, wrong. Walmart is evil.

Thanks for giving me the opportunity to let lola27 know that I regret my remarks about the photos of her meal, and have since I wrote it. It has haunted me, because it sounds so mean-spirited and I didn't know how to tell her.

Karen, your mountain of venemous diatribes speak for themselves. I haven't an ounce of respect for you or your ilk. I'm glad a few others spoke up and also renounced your diabolical hatred and derision of crippled and poor and obese human beings. I hope you get everything you deserve.

You are an interesting person, PerkyMac. From shooting off warnings that come from Biblical quotes to deciding that I have diabolical hatred of groups that I did not even mention in my posts.

I wish you the best, but in a real way. Not in the way you write to me above.

I wish those with health problems from obesity a way to find health if they wish to.

If they don't I feel badly for those who have to pay higher health insurance premiums due to the illnesses that so far the medical community claims derive from gross obesity.

And honestly, if you think I am alone in being concerned about this it is my belief that you are wrong. Your insistent heaping of spite won't change that though bullies often are rather scary.

And actually each comment I made was linked to the discussion of Wal-Mart - a more global discussion, and the one at hand.

The obesity issue was picked out of it by several people aside and apart from the discussion of Wal-Mart. I wonder why they did that and can only assume there is a personal bone to pick in some way about this issue.

Since it is food-related (or isn't it? I guess that's up for discussion too) perhaps a different thread could be started simply for the purpose of discussing gross obesity, food, and culture by those who wish to discuss this beyond the bounds of Wal-Mart which is where I started and where I finish.

If you don't see a link to Wal-Mart and grocery shopping and my comments about the grossly obese, fine. Argue that. Going off-topic to defend several personally motivated comments/posts is just not right. If you wish to continue personally bashing me when I have not personally bashed you there will be no further response from me. Start a new topic on it if it matters that much to you. Will I contribute to that topic? Nope. Why? Because I don't like to hear words from anyone's Bible thrown at me as a curse from someone who claims to be doing it in defense of Good against Evil.

I'm now off to find my ilk. :)

We welcome hearty debate and dissent as long as it is focused on the topic at hand, and not the people. Looks like this thread has run its course, particularly given the personal nature of the last few comments. We're closing the comments.

Start Talking!

Need a question answered? Have advice to share? Start a Talk topic now!

Sign up to start a talk topic

Sign up to get your questions answered and share advice.