Entries from Serious Eats tagged with 'snobbery'

Viewing Results from: 

Serious Grape: Some of My Best Friends Are Wine Snobs

Editor's note: We're pleased to bring you a new voice here on Serious Eats—Deb Harkness. You might already be familiar with Deb's work on Good Wine Under $20. If not, now's a great time to clink glasses with her and get to know her. She'll be joining us every other week with some insight on the vino in a column we call Serious Grape. Welcome to Serious Eats, Deb. Cheers! —Adam

My dad is an unlikely candidate for the label “wine snob.”

He has never taken a single wine course, reads no wine books and only occasionally purchases a wine magazine, keeps no more than a handful of bottles in the house for immediate drinking, and never spends more than $25 on a bottle of wine. He does not wear a cravat, smoke a pipe, or eschew the simple pleasure of a hot dog and a beer at a Dodgers game. Yet he loves sticking his nose into a glass of wine and calling out what he smells at the dinner table. “I smell blackberry!” he cries triumphantly. “And cloves, cinnamon, and chocolate, too!” The enthusiastic descriptions keep flowing after he’s sipped, and continue into the second glass and beyond.

Today, such enthusiasm for what's in the glass is enough for you to be branded a wine snob. In a recent Los Angeles Times article, columnist Joel Stein mocked the pretentiousness of people like my dad. Stein wrote that all he detected was “a whole lot of jackass” when reading wine critics who use fruity and flowery descriptors to tell you about a wine. After the disarming confession that he actually has a weak sense of smell, Stein went on to explain what he wants in a wine review instead: “Personally, I want to know if a wine is rough, balanced, acidic, sweet, simple, tannic, soft, hot with alcohol, mineraly, watery or has a long finish. I want to know that a Zinfandel, our greatest native grape, tastes like America: big, bold, unsubtle and ready to fight.”

Huh?

Continue reading »

Josh Ozersky And Nina Lalli Join The Fray

Yesterday we linked to Michael Ruhlman's response to Anthony Bourdain's Food Network rant, today we point you both to the return of serve from New York Magazine's Josh Ozersky in defense of Rachael Ray: "We don’t think this mandarin hauteur has any intellectual basis. Aside from the fact that it is unbecoming for a privileged and educated man to sneer at his own countrypeople, even by the standards of practical gastronomy his complaint doesn’t hold water. Rachael Ray and Sandra Lee are culinary lightweights, as they would be the first to admit, but they’re a product of — and engine for — people’s love for food. (...) For an amateur, taking tips from Rachael Ray is no less legitimate than a good cook learning from Lidia Bastianich or Mario Batali. (And that’s leaving aside the class issue — Ray’s special appeal to the hard-working people who barely have the time to make meals for themselves and their families.)"

Immediately volleyed back by Nina Lalli of the Village Voice: "Our problem with her—aside, of course, from the baby talk and gufawing—is that her food doesn't just look bad, it looks dangerously fatty and in many cases, not cost efficient. If Ray's passion is for the regular, hard working families who might otherwise turn to cheap, greasy takeout, she has an opportunity—if not an obligation—to explain that buying pre-shredded cheese is barely a time-saver and a huge waste of money, or that eating that much cheese to begin with is unhealthy as well as avoidable—even on a budget."

(We've got a continuing discussion on the Food Network's personalities in Serious Eats: Talk, you can tell us whom you like best or least over there or respond to the hullaballoo in the comments here.)