'No Impact Man,' First a Blog, Now a Movie and Book
"Those who are calling this movie a stunt are missing the point."

Colin Beavan with his daughter Isabella. [Photographs: noimpactman.typepad.com]
Nearly two years ago, I logged into my website Eat Local Challenge to find a large spike in hits. An article had been published in the New York Times about Colin Beavan, aka "No Impact Man," and his New York-dwelling family. Beavan had embarked on a year-long journey to make no net impact on the earth. The family didn't use electricity, bought nothing new, and famously stopped using toilet paper. So why the spike on Eat Local Challenge? Beavan's blog had linked to mine in reference to his family's no-impact efforts to eat food from within 250 miles of Manhattan.
As someone who tries to persuade people to eat locally in an approachable manner, convincing them that everyone can eat at least a few things locally, Beavan's methods seemed too extreme and too unattainable. I was the one thinking "crazy people like you give us a bad name." I dismissed Beavan's challenge as a pointless activity that did nothing to help further the cause of environmentalism in general.
Fast forward two years, and a documentary has been produced about Beavan, his wife Michelle Conlin, and their daughter Isabella. Cameras followed the family throughout their challenge and the resultant film gave me a much more balanced view of the No Impact Challenge.
Make no mistake: What Beavan's family did was extreme. In the movie, we see them turning off their electricity, walking stairs instead of taking elevators (nine flights to their apartment), getting rid of "unnecessary" products such as Michelle's make-up, and not purchasing anything new for the year. Many called the entire No Impact Man phenomenon a stunt, and the initial New York Times article spoke of Beavan's casting about for a sellable book topic before deciding to put his family through a year of no impact.
But by watching the movie, I began to understand what Beavan was trying to do. It's as if he skewed the attempt to have a lighter footprint on the earth to the absolute extreme, just so that at the end of the year, he and his family could pull back and see which extremes were doable and which were not in a real-life situation.
I began to see the similarities between Beavan and myself. Every year, I ask people to try eating local food for a month. Some people, during that time, take the attempt to the farthest point possible—just to see if they can do it. By the end of the month, participants reevaluate and decide what they can eat locally in their regular lives, usually adding coffee back into their diets but eschewing out-of-season cherries.

Those who are calling this movie a stunt are missing the point. Beavan is not asking us to do the same thing he did—rather, he is showing the extreme so that we can choose a comfortable place along the continuum between our reality and his challenge to himself.
The true hero of this story is Michelle Conlin, Colin Beavan's wife. While Beavan is ready to plunge into the challenge with both feet, Conlin is the reluctant participant. She joins because it's her husband's dream, and she wants to support it. Michelle is us. At one point she says to the camera, "This is easy for Colin, and it's like murder for me."
She questions Beavan every step of the way, and challenges his assertions that the family should give up coffee, vacation on a farm, and use a clay pot "refrigerator." At the end of the day, though, Conlin participates fully and stands by Beavan even as the New York Times article garners comments about how their child should be taken away and how the family is dirty and unhealthy. She's a questioner of the process while at the same time being completely supportive of Colin's dream.
Go see this movie. I think it will challenge you as it did me. I saw the movie about three weeks ago, and have considered its influence every day since.
Here is the film release schedule and Colin Beavan's appearance schedule. A No Impact Man book was also just released.
About the author: Jennifer Maiser writes about locally and sustainably grown food. She is the founder and editor of the Eat Local Challenge website and writes at Life Begins at 30, her personal weblog.
Add a comment:
Previewing your comment:
HTML Hints
Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>
Comment Guidelines
Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.
If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.

13 Comments:
man, i wonder if the dude smelled after that year.
and if they bought clothes at all during that year. what do you do? buy like 1/2000000 of a carbon credit for the factory that produced his jacket or something? kudos to them for doing it for so long.
foodinmouth at 11:42AM on 09/11/09
Clothes are easy, I get mine used at thrift shops or on Ebay. You wind up with a great wardrobe at a small fraction of the price.
redfish at 12:22PM on 09/11/09
i don't get it-how did they not use toilet paper?
gastronomeg at 12:32PM on 09/11/09
@redfish,
i'm not sure it works like that, does it? that's like saying the first person who buys the product is in charge of making sure the effects of production are counter balanced. When in fact, your demand on a second hand product is part of the price factored into the production of the product in the first place. in that the producer knows it can sell to a consumer, and the consumer knows it can be sold again at a thrift shop.
so your demand of the product helps the original producer to know, "hey i should make this." you're still not getting around the issue of if the factory produced X amount of pollution while producing a coat, how that is counter balanced. You're just giving an excuse to make yourself feel better about your choices.
foodinmouth at 12:33PM on 09/11/09
no toilet paper????? the whole thing sounds like a bunch of crap.
jword2001 at 2:40PM on 09/11/09
@Foodinmouth: I understand your argument, but shopping in a thrift store has to be better, doesn't it? It doesn't "counterbalance" anything necessarily, but it's got to count for something. I'm assuming it's the same reason why green interior designers go out of their way to purchase "used" or antique furniture; it's a way of repurposing items and leaving less to be wasted and thrown in landfills.
PumpkinBear at 3:03PM on 09/11/09
Sometimes you have to do something extreme to make a point. No one would've paid any attention to the project if he just went halfway...
Suzan Colon at 3:21PM on 09/11/09
Wait, how did he blog without electricity? Too extreme. Makes being a conscious eater/consumer look like a whole lotta crazy. We need to take steps every day to lesson our footprints, but I don't think chucking our fridges, and quality of life, is the way to get this sort of movement as widespread as it needs to be.
porkydickens at 3:23PM on 09/11/09
Actually I don't much care about conservation (I don't recycle anything), I just like to wear good clothes without paying much for them.
redfish at 4:11PM on 09/11/09
You don't care about conservation and you don't recycle anything? That's nothing to boast about.
PumpkinBear at 5:02PM on 09/11/09
@redfish that sounds pretty deplorable.
spartana07 at 1:15PM on 09/12/09
Thanks for the awesome article; I couldn't agree more. Just because what he did was crazy extreme (although - while maybe not on the ninth floor, I've lived on some pretty high walk-ups myself!) doesn't mean it doesn't make us all stop and think about what is - and isn't - sustainable in our own lives. For some more moderate ideas on how to eat sustainably in NYC check out this posting by my fellow blogger Erin: http://www.kimberlybelle.com/2009/05/go-green-a-conscientious-dining-list-by-erin.html and Eat It Up!
Cheers,
-Kimberly Belle
http://www.kimberlybelle.com
http://www.dinnerbellenyc.com
KimberlyBelle at 7:22PM on 09/12/09
I would read the book before commenting. I think Colin and Michelle are awesome!
There's an emergency going on, guys! Look up 350.org. Watch "The Story of Stuff" online (free). Read the No Impact Man book. Go see "The Age of Stupid". This is serious stuff.
The question is not whether we like nice clothes, or whether we will give up toilet paper or the internet. The task is to reduce US energy consumption by 95%, and soon. So, you decide: "WHAT will you DO" that is anywhere on that scale.
myrtoashe at 10:20PM on 09/12/09