• Share:
  • Send to Reddit
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Watch It with Us: 'Top Chef Las Vegas,' Ep. 2

20090820-tclv.jpg

[bravotv.com]

Tonight at 10 p.m. EST come join us as we watch the second episode of Top Chef Las Vegas. Expect Todd English as a guest judge, and a battle of the sexes for the Elimination Challenge.

Jump in the comment thread as the episode unfolds. And if you need a refresher course on the sixteen chefs, check out our Episode One recap.

42 Comments:

I met Jen Carroll last week after eating an amazing meal in her restaurantand she is so nice! She even invited me to come back and see what the kitchen is like (I'm 16 and maybe aspiring to be a chef). It's quite clear why Eric Ripert hand-selected her to run his reaturant, 10 Arts, in Philly. The only problem is that she wasn't giving up any info about this season of Top Chef

I've got my money on Kevin this season. He seems to think through everything he is doing, and takes this more seriously than anyone else (in the first episode, at least). Plus...beards rule. :)>

I've never heard anyone pronounce ceviche "ce-veech" like that. Was that a nickname or just an alternate pronunciation?

Oooh, people trash-talking seitan. This is gonna get feisty.

Scotch, bourbon, AND cognac at the same time? I like Jen's style.

Let's go team Ashley Merriman!

I don't know which would be worse—two ingredients, or twelve.

Todd English looks like the product of a one-night stand between Sean Connery and Sean Connery.

This is Top Chef, not Top Scallop. But seriously, how could you mess up a scallop?

Every year the cheftestants seem to live in the shooting location's worst example of housing bubble excess. Last year, Williamsburg condo. This year, Vegas suburbs McMansion.

Mmmm, "bread toast."

Kevin's looking to perform pretty well this season.

which brother is which?

This is when Jen should be joining the dude's team.

wait, boys are cooking for the bachelorette and vice versa?

alright, i live in philly and love it so obviously... voting for jen c. one of my good friends worked as her sous chef and he said she scared the shit out of him. i love that she's against the whole boys vs. girls thing. she seems the most down to earth.

Kerchief plus baseball cap: no, no, no!

Argh! Ceveech again?! What is wrong with this chick?

Wellll, it's pretty clear what subplot the producers decided to edit into this episode...

@cheesebreadbutter: the problem with Jen C's argument is that she said that the male female differentiation didnt matter on how someone could cook. If that is the case, then why complain if its the same as a random team selection.

i HAAAAAAATE mike i.

@val1s- I understand what youre saying, I think that its just that bravo made the whole gimmick BOYS VS. GIRLS. whereas randomly, it doesn't seem so bias. does that make sense? it did turn out to be pretty independent cooking though, which i didn't expect.

@foodieteen - do you have a philly food blog? you sound like an author of one of the blogs i read

Eve or Preeti. Or both???

eve sucked again, she's out

None of the judges has ever said a single positive thing about Eve. In either episode.

Well at least she was a good sport about it.

Yes, thank you, Eve is gone!!

So glad that Eve left. Her personality was just so down. Every scene she was in made me just feel kind of drained of energy.

Laurine or Brian to win it all.

Sean Connery = OK, double dose (see harveyj) = creepy!

@Erin "ce-veech" is the French pronunciation, which isn't suprising for her to use considering she works in an Eric Ripert restaurant.

Am I the only one that was annoyed by the whole same-sex marriage topic by Ashley (I think that's her name)? I'm 100% pro same-sex marriage, but the challenge had nothing to do with the marriage debate. If you're a lesbian professional chef, might you not have to cook for weddings or anniversary parties once in a while? It just seemed unnecessary.

pbelardo, that is exactly what I came in here to say! I don't know if it was contrived by the show producers or if Ashley is just such a drama-queen attention-whore that she decided to make a big deal out of if, but the whole thing was really getting on my nerves. You know what? If the challenge offends you that much, quit the show. There are plenty of other chefs who *want* to be there.

PLEASE! don't put spoilers on the front page by Xing out the losing contestants faces-- you did this with Top Chef Masters and it was truly annoying.

I agree that the same-sex marriage "controversy" seemed liked it was a bit forced and set up or at least egged on by the producers. Notice that most of the gays who got dragged out to the griping table just sat there and never said a word about it.

I guess the chick who was so upset will never take a job catering a wedding or cooking dinner for a couple on their anniversary or honeymoon. Please.

@pbelardo My take on Ashley's same-sex tangent (which I'm in favor of btw) was to remember the audience the producers are editing for. Bravo TV has a huge following in the gay population and this was a way to speak to an issue many are concerned with.

Glad Eve is gone, just wasn't a good fit for the show.

Please let's get rid of Jesse. STOP CRYING!

Forget Ashley. Let's figure out who this season's Leah & Hosea are going to be!!

perhaps when this episode was recorded, california's prop 8 was in the news. it may seem a little removed from the public eye right now, but when the california supreme court was handing down its ruling, it was hard for anyone in the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community to ignore.

any chef can bring his/her politics to the table and reap/suffer the consequences.

as far as controversy is concerned, would you cook for an anti-abortion or pro-choice function if your personal politics disagreed? maybe. maybe not.

but would top chef force the contestants to do it?

Shuffer: Sorry but that rationale just doesn't fly. Signing on for a cooking show in Vegas, and then pouting because they want you to cook for a wedding-related event is just juvenile. She even admitted that she knew it was probably going to happen. So what's her problem, exactly? She seemed to have a beef with Top Chef for 'putting her in that situation' more than society in general for 'not letting her get married'. Imagine a chef who is in Gambler's Anonymous who signs on for Top Chef: Vegas and then pisses and moans because they keep asking him to roll dice and play poker as part of the challenges. Man up, Nancy. You knew what was going to be involved before you showed up, so you have no one to blame but yourself.

Also of note, the best hamburger I've ever had in my life was at a restaurant where the chef was a very strict vegetarian (for morale reasons). She managed to take his personal convictions out of the picture and give the customer what he wanted. Why is Ashley so special


One of two things is going on. Either Ashley is a spoiled, whiny little attention whore who has to piss on everyone else's good time (in which case, she needs to be the next to go), or the producers just injected a little manufactured drama to boost ratings (in which case, Top Chef is not the show I thought it was and is, in fact, more like Real World)

@cheesebreadbutter no, I'm just a 16 year-old kid. I was thinking about starting one, maybe I should get on that because I love food and like to write... which blog? you got me curious

What bothered me most about the same-sex marriage discussion was how the producers decided to frame Preeti and Ashley in the same shot and show it from 3 different angles. What was that all about?

I don't have a problem with her bringing it up and stating her opinion and standpoint. But repeatedly bringing it up like that. It was annoying. But, I'm sure the producers and editors did their part in playing it up.

Additionally, it seemed a little awkward for the rest of the contestants when they got back to the house post-prep and she was still complaining.

Michael has many meathead-like qualities. Most assholes are just that way and don't know it, Michael seems to try at it.

I like both Voltaggio's, but they would really have to be outstanding to both make it to the final three. It could be compelling telie for the episode where they go from four to three. Could there really be the two of them in the final three?

"On the Line" does a great job of explaining the Ripert way. Will JC be the poster child for "anti-Ramsay/ MP White" school?

Laurine is an absolute mystery to me after two entire shows. I remember nothing about her.

It was about this time last season that we thought Ariane was going to be the next to go. Is Jesse this season's Ariane?

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.