Seriously Asian: Searching for the Perfect Wok
Principles of Stir Fry, Part One

My anodized-aluminum nonstick wok. [Chichi Wang]
Over the years I’ve developed close relationships with my kitchen instruments. In my arsenal of tools, the cast iron skillets are my pride and joy. Slick from constant use with duck fat and lard, the patina of the skillets is nonstick and the browning abilities, virtually indisputable. Without exception, my most difficult working relationship has been with my collection of woks.
The majority of them are stacked in a dark corner in the kitchen. I take one out when I need an extra receptacle, but mostly, the woks are reminders of past hopes and plans. They are the unwanted ones—the vessels that have, for one reason or another, failed to produce the right results.
First Attempt: The Carbon Steel Wok
I started my search for the perfect wok by gathering information about the different materials available. Touted as the material used by traditional Chinese cooks, the 16-inch wide carbon steel wok was my first purchase. The wok was beautiful the day I brought it home: shiny with a blue tinge, the surface was supposed to develop a dark patina once seasoned.
“Patina” is a culinary term for the acquired change in the appearance of a surface. Ideally, you want a cooking vessel with a distinguished patina. With cast iron, a patina develops when fat comes into contact with the surface of the metal. The fat penetrates the material and in doing so, transforms it from a dull and dry surface into a slick and supple one.
Patina development is an intimate process for a cook and his or her vessel. Pouring acidic ingredients, like tomato sauce or wine, can wear away at the patina, whereas fat builds it up. A patina is an organic, dynamic surface that is sensitive to its surroundings. When a skillet is seasoned enough to acquire one, the patina becomes virtually nonstick.
Over the next few months, I stir-fried almost every day in the carbon steel wok, and even acquired a smaller carbon steel vessel as an accompaniment. A slick, dark mahogany patina emerged on both woks, yet a deeper problem had become apparent from the outset.
No matter how fiercely I preheated the woks, the moment I tossed in my ingredients, the heat would quickly dissipate. For stir-frying, the absence of high heat is crippling. Without high and dry heat, the items steam instead of sear, precluding the delicately charred, elusive taste of a good stir-fry. Regretfully, I put away the carbon steel woks and went back to the drawing table.
Second Attempt: The Cast Iron Wok

An example of a cast iron wok. [cooking.com]
For my second material, I chose a cast iron wok. Fourteen inches in diameter, it weighed a hefty ten pounds. Though it took both of my arms to lift the wok onto the burner, I was enchanted by its power. At last, I could sear strips of meat and vegetables in minutes without collecting any steam at the base of the wok.
The all-important sizzle sound lasted the entirety of the cooking time rather than petering out prematurely. Still, the relationship between the cook and her wok was less than ideal. Unable to lift it with one arm, I found myself resorting to a scooping method to remove items from the heat. Worse, the cast iron never took well to added starch, an integral part of certain stir-frys. Like all uncomfortable relationships, soon the negative aspects outweighed the positive.
Third Attempt: The Nonstick Aluminum Wok
After the cast iron wok, I took a hiatus from stir-frying to think things through. I needed a light material that could still sustain heat. I wanted a patina that could sear and char quickly with a surface that wouldn’t stick to a starch-based slurry. Finally, I caved in and bought an anodized-aluminum nonstick wok just like the one my mother owns.
For years my mother insisted that her single wok was better than all of mine put together, but I didn’t want to believe her. While aluminum is an excellent conductor of heat, the idea of nonstick cookware has never appealed to me. Nonstick vessels don't grow and mature with the cook. The surface comes ready from the factory and can only get worse over time. Still, I should have remembered that my mother is usually right about most things.
My mother is a scientist. It’s really too bad she hadn’t explained things to me in scientific terms, because there’s a very good reason why the aluminum wok works so well. In sum, there are two properties to consider when choosing the ideal wok material: heat capacity and conductivity.
Heat capacity is defined as the amount of energy needed to change the temperature of a given material. Heat capacity works both ways, meaning that if a lot of heat is required to make the vessel hot, a lot of heat must be given off before it cools down again. Conductivity means exactly what it sounds like—the efficiency of the material to redistribute heat evenly. By examining the heat capacity and conductivity measurements for common cooking materials, I was finally able to understand my struggles with past woks:
| Volumetric Heat Capacity (in joules per cubic centimeter per °C) |
Thermal Conductivity (watts per thousandth of a °C) |
|
| Iron | 3.54 | 80.2 |
| Copper | 3.45 | 401 |
| Carbon Steel | 3.71 | 49.8 |
| Aluminum | 2.42 | 237 |
Why Was Aluminum So Successful?
If we examine the heat capacity figures alone, the aluminum is the poorest performer. However, what aluminum lacks in heat capacity, it more than makes up for in terms of conductivity. We’ve all noticed this fact when cooking with aluminum—it takes very little time for the pan to heat up evenly after we add food to the surface. Aluminum is bested only by copper but even so, aluminum is three times faster at heat conduction than iron, and six times faster than steel. Carbon steel loses on both fronts, being both a material that cools down too quickly as well as a poor conductor of heat. (Of course, the clear winner here is copper, which is why people have put up with its toxicity by coating it with tin and selling it for exorbitant prices.)
But what about the matter of heat capacity, cast iron lovers say? Isn’t the heat retention so superb because the cast iron is so heavy and thick? Certainly. Heat capacity depends on pan thickness. While aluminum performs well due to its conductivity, the sheer thickness of a cast iron skillet compensates for its poorer conductivity.
The ratio of thickness to heat capacity is linear—if the cast iron skillet is twice as thick as another material, then it will take twice as much heat to bring the cast iron up to the same temperature, and twice as long for the heat to dissipate. This explains exactly why we cast iron lovers are so passionate in our devotion to the material. Once searing hot, a thick cast iron skillet will stay that way for a very long time.
Think of cast iron and aluminum as two separate models. If cast iron is a huge grain silo, then aluminum is a smaller silo with faster workers. Both models can distribute grain efficiently—the cast iron does so by retaining a very high grain level (i.e. temperature), while the aluminum simply refills the silo as soon as it’s been depleted.
So, Does the Perfect Wok Exist?
Ideally, it would be a very thick copper vessel lined with a thin layer of stainless steel, not tin, which would melt after hitting 450°F. Barring such an extravagantly expensive wok, a very thick aluminum wok would be superb for its high heat capacity, high conductivity, light weight, and nonstick surface that won't cling to starch slurries.
I wonder why cookware manufacturers haven’t gotten in on this action. What manufacturers call “heavy gauge aluminum” is usually no more than 1/4 inch thick. Why not make an aluminum wok that’s one inch thick, or even two inches at that? The idea of a grossly thick aluminum wok seems feasible given the lightness of the material to begin with. If I were Jeffrey Steingarten, I’d call up Calphalon or All-Clad and cajole them into making an extra-thick aluminum wok, just for my purposes.
Even so, the anodized-aluminum wok I currently own has been my steady stir-frying companion. It’s not as fiercely scorching as the cast iron yet its maneuverable weight and superior conductivity make it a pleasure to use.
Someday, there’ll be a burner in my kitchen, about ten times as big as any other, that will match the heat of a restaurant flame. For now, my anodized aluminum is the workhorse wok, turning out dish after reliably good dish. After many years and many woks, I am one content stir-fryer.
Here's a recipe for stir-fried green beans »
Add a comment:
Previewing your comment:
HTML Hints
Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>
Comment Guidelines
Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.
If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.

23 Comments:
So which one do you have?
I have a carbon steel and notice the same complaints and always wondered why. It now makes sense, but where do I turn specifically and how much can I expect to spend?
Great article, but no payoff! I'm ready to buy buy buy! :)
jimmy0x52 at 4:58PM on 08/21/09
I have the All-Clad LTD2 Open Stir Fry 14" and Calphalon Contemporary Nonstick Wok, you should check these out.
pookguy at 6:44PM on 08/21/09
I've used both carbon steel and cast iron woks, and I've found that neither works well on home range. Both, however, shine like diamonds when you use them over a very, very high flame. I've never been able to use a flame that's as intense as the upside-down jet engines they have at good Chinese restaurants, but a very powerful outdoor burner yields a fast-recharging surface that resists sticking even after the addition of a starch slurry. It always gives a really wonderful, almost smoky, wok hee. It's all a matter of the right tool for the right job. But seeing as I'm usually cooking on a much more pedestrian cooktop, the anodized aluminum wok seems perfect. I'll be first in line for the Chichi Wang Superwok.
Hannekin at 7:05PM on 08/21/09
So.... what kind of coating do the non-stick woks have? Stir-frying in a wok is supposed to be done at very very high heat. I'd always heard you're not supposed to use non-stick pots and pans at high heat. I'm not so well-versed in non-stick coatings, though. Someone, please educate me. :]
My family has a carbon steel wok. And I think we've always used carbon steel ones. Perhaps it depends on the make. I've never had a problem with mine losing heat.
oh. and i love your scientific approach. I wish I saw more real science here more often.
engmcmuffin at 7:15PM on 08/21/09
I've only used my carbon steel wok that I bought years and years ago (probably around 1970) in Boston's Chinatown.
It's got a beautiful deep dark patina and cleans up like it was coated with Teflon.
Best $5.00 I ever spent on a kitchen utensil.
I love my All-Clad pots and pans, but I'd venture a guess that a wok and cover would probably run $250 or $350 maybe more.
I know you can still get the carbon steel wok in any Asian market of any size for a good price. The hard part is building up the patina, but I'm sure you could start seasoning it like a cast iron pan.
Grifola frondosa at 9:35PM on 08/21/09
I'm sick of gringo stir-fry. Has anyone had any success using charcoal to create heat sufficient for the real deal?
I'd love to hear all about it.
At the moment, I'm not interested in a gas burner.
RJ Foodie at 9:37PM on 08/21/09
I love my carbon steel wok, and I REALLY love my Indian karhai (kind of a mini wok). I have no idea what it is made from, but it's some kind of steel, and it's awesome for frying. I cook Indian or Thai food almost every day, and have never had an issue. And I would never buy a non-stick wok of any kind.
Dcarl1 at 9:41PM on 08/21/09
Any specific model or brand to recommend?
I have a Joyce Chen model, but the coating has burned/curled at the bottom. Guess it could not handle the high heat of even my electric stove-top.
We are looking to replace it with a top-notch model. Price is not an issue. We want the best.
Recommendations?
Remander at 2:04AM on 08/22/09
If the carbon steel wok has been the preferred choice of the Chinese, then it must not be the material that is the problem, but something else. I think the problem that most people are having is with the output of their stove. My father grew up in China and often complained that there just weren't enough BTUs on the US home burner to do real stir frying. At least, not enough to do stir frying for serving more than 2 people. Regular American home cooking just doesn't require that amount of firepower, so it's not as widely available on the market.
We once cooked in the kitchen of an old church which had a powerful 4 ring burner on its stove. It had separate gas flow control for each ring. That was most satisfactory.
I've since acquired a cast iron wok from Lodge, since I can't afford to just buy an industrial quality stove along with an industrial quality range hood. My other choice would be to get one of those spartan outdoor gas ranges that boast high BTU. Outdoors, so I won't have to worry about a range hood. But, what about the rain? Alas...
idriveajeed at 8:04AM on 08/22/09
Hi folks,
Any thick anondized aluminum wok will do, and it should only be in the 30 to 50 dollar range, if not less. The one my mother uses cost me 3 bucks at a rummage sale, and I think we eventually traced its origins to Target. That’s one really nice thing about aluminum cookware – it’s cheap! Of course, there are nicer models out there – certainly ones that I’ve never been able to afford, but I’m sure others can chime in with recommendations.
For those who like their carbon steel vessels: I think that over a very high flame, a carbon steel wok works because it acts as a thin mediator between food and fire. The fire can jump into the wok, and then you’re REALLY searing that food. However, I’ve tried using carbon steel woks over several different gas stove ranges in home kitchens in the United States, and the results have never been hot enough. But if you have a Viking range or something like that, then that’s a different story.
I think idriveajeed is spot-on. In Shanghai, my aunt stir-fries over a counter-top gas range that would never pass US safety regulations. The flames are extremely powerful. The last time I visited, I believe that she switched over to an anodized aluminum wok, but I know that in my grandparents’ house they’re still using a carbon steel wok.
Chichi Wang at 10:27AM on 08/22/09
I, too, am concerned about what engmcmuffin said: using a nonstick surface at high heat (like you'd have to use with a wok)... Calphalon used to make anodized aluminum pots and pans that didn't have a nonstick coating - are those no longer available?
emilydev at 1:14PM on 08/22/09
I think you'll be hard pressed to find a manufacturer willing to work with aluminum at that gauge. You're talking about procuring a material in a very specific gauge for a very specific use for a limited market. The seemingly general disdain for aluminum cookware and the fact that aluminum can be up to 4 times more expensive per pound than steel would make mass production for a niche market kind of financially unfeasible for a manufacturer I would imagine.
A nice idea if you could swing it though
plots at 5:32PM on 08/22/09
A turkey fryer and a carbon steel wok are all that you need to master wok cooking. The turkey fryer will put out the intense heat that you need to get the wok hot and keep it there. The carbon steel wok will provide a porous cooking surface that will over time give your food that special wok flavor. With a little shopping around you can find a turkey fryer that will work with a wok right out of the box. The kind built with a ring that the frying kettle sits inside of seem to work the best. A larger wok sits on top of the ring at the correct distance from the flames. The fryer also works very well for paella if you have that right pan for it.
Make sure that you follow all of the instructions that come with the turkey fryer. Just because you aren't heating up a cauldron of oil doesn't mean it's not dangerous or that it can be used inside.
keithlewis at 4:15AM on 08/23/09
I've tossed two carbon steel woks in despair and frustration over the last few decades, and all but abandoned my attempts at Chinese cooking. And as cooking experts who knew better than me always said that carbon steel woks were the only way to go, I never considered a nonstick aluminum wok. As I'm a devoted user of aluminum pots and pans, I'm going to make one my next purchase, I now feel confident about trying Chinese dishes again. Thanks for this great article and analysis!
MMinNYC at 3:03PM on 08/23/09
This is a fantastic piece - I'd love to hear more on cookware, as my collection is a pathetic exercise in miscellanea picked up from thrift stores and departing roommates...
atammal at 10:49AM on 08/24/09
I don't think we need to worry about the non-stick coating coming off IF we are using our anodized aluminum woks over a conventional gas stove.
All of my struggles with woks have stemmed from the puny flames emitted by regular stoves. If I had to worry about the non-stick coating wearing off, I'd probably be dealing with a MUCH bigger fire, in which case I'd switch over to carbon steel or a lighter cast iron wok!
Chichi Wang at 11:00AM on 08/24/09
Anodized aluminum does not have a nonstick coating, such as Teflon. Instead, the anodizing process creates a thicker layer of an aluminum oxide, which supposedly results in a nonstickish protective surface. Heat therefore is not the problem, but cooking acidic foods for long periods of time might result in some leaching of aluminum into the food. But that's not what stir frying is all about. I think I'm about to jump on the anodized aluminum wok bandwagon, especially since I just reconnected with 'Mrs. Chiang's Szechuan Cookbook'. And, by the way, if we're going to worry about aluminum leaching into food from cooking, what about all those soft drinks everyone is chugging from aluminum cans?
JoanB at 12:30PM on 08/24/09
It's amazing how we associate scarcity with quality. Nowadays, there is a bias against aluminum because it is so widespread, though ironically it was prized above gold until they figured out a way to easily extract it about one hundred years ago. The properties cited in this article really do make the case for thick aluminum for a whole line of cookware, not just woks. Even if it is 4 times more expensive per pound than steel, since it is 1/3 the density of steel, the price per wok need not be that high, especially since aluminum is a lot easier to mold than steel. And since an aluminum wok that is 3 times thicker than a steel one will maintain much faster heat redistribution and heat retention (according to the table) while still being the same weight, I would much rather have the former.
miloptimus at 1:55PM on 08/24/09
I was really puzzled this summer when I used my carbon steel wok over coals in a campfire because I thought I'd be getting the heat I wasn't able to get on the stove. Now I know that the problem was the heat retention of the steel.
aharste at 2:40PM on 08/24/09
keithlewis has the right idea with the turkey-fryer-burner. It's a great way to approximate those insane burners from Chinese restaurants. I believe Alton Brown has done that on a few episodes of Good Eats as well.
jd7979 at 4:18PM on 08/24/09
This is ridiculous. Use a cheap, carbon steel wok from a Chinese grocery store and an outdoor propane burner like the ones people use to fry turkeys or boil shrimp or, for homebrewers, brew beer--mine is used for all of these endeavors, plus stir frying. Voila! Just like a Chinese restaurant. You get the "wok hei" taste that you can't possibly get using a wimpy 15,000 BTU kitchen stove burner. No need to worry about heat conductivity or other such nonsense. The answer lies in the burner, not the wok.
Lorenzo at 6:14PM on 08/24/09
An outdoor propane burner is not so convenient for those in apartments and/or live somewhere where there is snow on the ground for over half the year. :)
I bought this Korean "marble-coated" non-stick wok last year and it cooks decently well, and it cleans so easily that I'm thinking of buying their frying pans the next time I need to replace my Teflon ones.
anonymoose at 12:53PM on 08/25/09
I've watch ATK (america's test kitchen) and they've repeatedly said not to even bother with wok's because our output in ranges cannot do the cookware justice. I agree with Lorenzo, the burner's the issue and not the type of wok!
I use a good nonstick skillet and if I want authentic wok cookery I'll go to China town!
jscarpetta at 1:24PM on 08/26/09