• Share:
  • Send to Reddit
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

'Top Chef Masters,' Ep. 6: Trick in a Box

"An episode of brotherly love."

20090722topchefmasters.png

Top Chef Masters soldiers on. Tonight's competition marked the last of six four-way faceoffs, each qualifying a chef for the Champions Round. Next week, we'll see these six chefs go head-to-head—but this Wednesday, there was still one more slot to fill.

The Contestants (above, from left)

Roy Yamaguchi: Roy’s; Imua Family Services
Jonathan Waxman: Barbuto; Meals on Wheels
Art Smith: Table Fifty-Two, Art and Soul; Common Threads
Michael Cimarusti: Providence; Grameen Foundation

Quickfire Challenge:

Another blast from Top Chef past—the Aisle Trial. Chefs were each assigned a single aisle at Whole Foods, and could use only ingredients found in that aisle (and purchased with just $20) in their Quickfire dish. The judges? Whole Foods employees.

WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD.

“I don’t open jars. I don’t open cans. I don’t deal with that kind of thing," Jonathan Waxman ventured nervously. His mint, roasted pepper and lentil salad won three and a half stars. Roy Yamaguchi felt out of sorts in the Italian aisle, but pulled together a pasta with fried egg and "Asian flavors," for four stars. "This is so weird," said one judge. "I've never had eggs on pasta before!"

Art Smith's multi-grain risotto earned four stars for its texture and crunch, but the five-star prize went to Michael Cimarusti, for a whipped chocolate parfait with ginger-Sauternes syrup and sesame crackers. "My wife is a pastry chef," he said proudly. "I don't mess with that in the kitchen at home." It must have rubbed off.

Elimination Challenge:

Each chef was sent to Whole Foods to pick out a set of ingredients—for another chef. In a regular episode of Top Chef, this would be a recipe for disaster. ("Soy sauce, blue cheese, and Cool Whip! Suck it, Ilan!") But for the most part, these chefs doled out goods they'd grab for themselves: high-quality proteins, interesting veggies, nothing too bizarre. "For professional chefs," Waxman said, "the word ‘sabotage’ does not exist.” He's clearly never met Hosea and Stefan.

  • Roy Yamaguchi tuned out a surf-and-turf: short rib with garlic chili paste, and a lemongrass-crusted mahi mahi. The judges appreciated his flavors but noted that he seemed frazzled and totally off his game, with some meats overcooked, others underdone. "You could taste the tension," Oseland said. Fifteen stars, and he's out.
  • Michael Cimarusti served tender lamb medallions over a sunchoke puree, which Oseland didn't mind, but noted that "nothing tasted incredibly delicious." And he didn't finish saucing the plates. Seventeen and a half—also gone.
  • Jonathan Waxman went for an admittedly "retro" grilled pork chop, paired with sausage and served with a truffle-topped cauliflower and celery root puree. He suffered from mild plating issues—the red wine reduction ran all over the place—but got points for flavor and execution. Twenty stars.

The Verdict:

But the prize went to Smith, whose fried chicken two ways and tiny mango pie delighted the diners and charmed the judges. "This oozes Art Smith," Gail Simmons gushed. He teared up in delight—and the chefs applauded.

We ended up with another episode of brotherly love. “You all took care of each other!” said Gael One. “I’ve never seen this before!” gasped Gail Two. No evil ingredients, no death wishes, no trash-talking. These were chefs who clearly respected each other. (As well they should.)

So we're left with the All-Star Six: Art Smith, Michael Chiarello, Rick Bayless, Anita Lo, Hubert Keller, and Suzanne Tracht. Expect this competition to get a lot more heated.

12 Comments:

I really enjoyed this episode. Actually I've enjoyed all of the Masters episodes. Nice to see the camraderie. Anyone happen to notice that Michael Cimarusti's chef's coat appeared to be made out of seersucker? I'll bet it's a bit cooler.

I think what I really enjoyed about this episode was how all of the chefs had such respect for each other, although it did suck a little bit that Michael was purposely stuck without any fish.

I also liked that Roy left his ego at the door and fessed up to the fact that improvisation isn't his forte. How many times have you seen on TC where people blame lay blame on other things or people.

I'm guessing that this is going to be a two part finale? I was really hoping that they'd squeeze three or four more episodes out of this (a semifinal round of 3 each, and then a finale).

From an entertainment standpoint I'm glad to see Art Smith make the final.

I thought the show was really good, yet it seems the chefs were rated lower than normal.

dineomite:

I also thought it was sort of odd that Waxman didn't give Michael any fish. Given the whole kumbaya thing going on with the other chefs, it seemed a little, shall we say, *competitive* to leave the "fish-meister" without any fish....

i thought it was the most boring episode yet.

the aisle challenge? cmon. simple stuff.

mystery box challenge. the chefs are professionals they arent going to screw one another over like they would if it was the regular season.

the show spends too much time on the critics discussing the dishes.

the show had much more potential.

Of all the cooking challenge shows on TV, I enjoy this show best. The chef's are really comptetitive but respect one another. They are all good sports. So far....

Art Smith and Jonathan waxman definately banged after that episode. rumor has it that they used crisco as the grease. James was really upset they did not include him. TravPard, they do show way to much judging, something a fast foward through. Imagine what would have happened if they were living together? Art and Waxman would ave been like Josea and that chick who is not memorable.

I'd say that a good 50% of that episode was either Smith's double entendres or judges comments. And am I the only one that gets really creeped out by Oseland?

I have enjoyed this show so far with my one complaint being the obviously written and rehearsed lines that the judges deliver right before they give their star rating...I can't give you a quote but I'm sure you know what I mean...something like..."your dish looked fit for a king but ended up in the moat...two stars..." UGH.

@dineomite: There are going to be four more episodes. It's going to change to a format more like regular Top Chef, where they eliminate one each week for the next three weeks before they have their finale.

Could you please change the thumbnail photo in the link at the bottom of the page? Nothing that Gordon Ramsey does deserves to be linked to Top Chef. I'm not saying that TCM is a paragon of virtuous television, but it's definitely not Ramsey, that's for damn sure.

So much was said and written about the respect that the chefs had for each other - and that there was no sabatoge among the masters... and yet there was ONLY one chef who didn't provide his chosen competitor with his favorite, signature ingredients: Jonathan Waxman purposefully didn't give Michael Cimarusti any seafood, which is obviously his passion and specialty. All the other chefs seemed to go out of their way to provide exactly what their fellow chefs would most want. I completely lost respect for Jonathan Waxman. It made me suspect that he was pretty scared about Michael as a competitor, especially after he won the quickfire.

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.