Seattle Starbucks Locations Shed Starbucks Logo

Photograph taken by rudolf_schuba on Flickr
Starbucks rose to dominate the coffee landscape by slapping its logo on thousands upon thousands of virtually identical cafés from Jakarta to Peoria. But now, trying to shed its image as a corporate monolith, Starbucks is actually removing its brand from a number of its stores, starting in its birthplace, Seattle.
The Seattle Times reports that three un-Starbucksed cafés will open under other names, like the rechristened “15th Avenue Coffee and Tea,” debuting on Monday. It will serve beer and wine, and host music performances, poetry nights, and other community-oriented events. It's still Starbucks pulling the strings—but with no green logos in sight.
Add a comment:
Previewing your comment:
HTML Hints
Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>
Comment Guidelines
Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.
If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.

17 Comments:
So NOW they are trying to hide? That seems pretty silly. I like the idea of the add-ons, but to rename and re logo everything? Dumb.
SkippyMom at 7:12AM on 07/17/09
Please tell me this is a joke! Pretending to be independent, mom & pop coffee shops when you're a corporate behemoth? Gah! I hope this doesn't spread beyond Seattle.
jengrowsinbklyn at 8:24AM on 07/17/09
@jen...you took the words right out my mouth. they expand and knock out many local coffee shops and now they have the nerve to pose as one. i'm kinda peeved about this.
_greenbean at 8:32AM on 07/17/09
i hope they will put out a list of these re-done shops. so i can avoid them.
engmcmuffin at 9:27AM on 07/17/09
Boozebucks?
mrbadideasdotcom at 9:40AM on 07/17/09
Actually, USA Today ran a story about this today and they have the new name as“15th Avenue Coffee and Tea Inspired by Starbucks”. Which, in my view, is far uglier than just changing the name and dropping "Starbucks" wholesale.
Still, the whole "trying to hide" thing strikes me as disingenuous. Companies diversify when they want to capture more market share. Look at The Gap. You wouldn't say they're "trying to hide" by opening Banana Republic and Old Navy stores. It's just a different environment for a slightly different product line. Even if you're not a fan of their coffee (and i'm ambivalent about it at best, preferring Dunkin' by a longshot), if nothing else, Starbucks creates lots of jobs. So let's not rag on them too hard for trying something new to keep stores open and in business.
mr guy at 10:14AM on 07/17/09
@mr guy - Okay. Point taken. It still just seems dishonest and jerky, to me.
mollykate678 at 10:27AM on 07/17/09
The part that seems jerky to me is the part where they go hang out in other people's coffee shops with "Observation" folders. That's pretty rude.
leilah at 10:58AM on 07/17/09
Hm.
Does this mean I should begin a personal boycott?
Sounds like they're hiding somehting....
...suggestions anyone?
hungrychristel at 11:29AM on 07/17/09
I read about this in the paper yesterday and I find it quite funny. It seems like starbucks is having a bit of a mid-life crisis going on. First instant coffee now hiding themselves?!
I think it shows they are seeing/feeling the backlash that was created by them becoming too big. What's funny is, the neighborhood where they will be opening this new 'incognito' store has so many GREAT places to get coffee, why would anyone go to this new store? This store is one that was slated to close down earlier this year, now they're just trying to hide who they are in hopes of pulling in new business. Clever marketing I suppose.
BTW, the only good thing about this new store: REAL ESPRESSO MACHINES! It won't have one of those nasty automated machines that they replaced all their La Marzocco machines with.
violetcassis at 12:28PM on 07/17/09
I'm sure these locations will be equally as lame-o as their regular crappy locations...
GingerSnap at 12:56PM on 07/17/09
wow, I actually think this is quite a good idea. I mean, if there's going to be a fun coffee shop to hang out in that has community outreach and varied products, as well as good coffee, i'm there! it's very difficult for "real" mom+pop locations to survive nowadays with big chains dominating the market (and it's NOT just starbucks - dunkin donuts is a far greater curse in my opinion). far better for starbucks to try to rebrand to reach a different part of the market than not to do so if the customer wants it. it's sillier to pine for the days before large corporations than to just accept their existence and appreciate that their executives are trying to find a way to become less behemoth-like.
teenagefoodie at 9:41PM on 07/17/09
I think it's manipulative. They're pretending to be independent to fool people who would otherwise avoid their chain. I go out of my way to support local business, and I don't like being tricked.
Besides, no amount of rebranding will fix Starbucks' terribly bitter, overroasted coffee.
piccola at 10:40PM on 07/17/09
From what I've heard, it seems like they are doing more than just rebranding the shop. They are actually trying to remake it with independent shop touches. Apparently, they actually blatantly sent spies into successful independent shops to take notes.
I suppose it could be a good idea if they put unique and individual thought into each different store, but I doubt they can really manage that given the number of Starbuck shops there are.
wunami at 12:19PM on 07/18/09
they may create a lot of jobs, but they aren't *good* jobs. they get a lot of good press for their policy of "full time benefits for part time work" but actually have quietly changed their policy to no longer hire anyone for over 12 hours a week, or under 34 hours, effectively eliminating the part time benefits employees.
it doesn't strike me as remotely out of corporate character for them to sneak in and try to steal back everyone who left for greener, more independent pastures.
in case you hadn't guessed, i'm a former "partner," let go for blowing the whistle on a manager who was a serial sexual harasser.
there is just nothing clean about this company, and they don't deserve a dime of your money.
kalamazu at 12:28AM on 07/20/09
Is this un-branding? I live in Seattle, and I can only suspect that they are trying to fool customers into thinking that they are a cozy little independent espresso joint just like the ones in my neighborhood here in the Greenwood District.
It's ludicrous!
Stushi at 7:32PM on 07/20/09
If anyone finds out where the 3 are, please post it. It was not clear to me that all would have the same name. The "15th Avenue" is over on Capitol Hill, yes? But there wasn't other info.
I live in SEattle. Until recently I drank at Starbucks as I like their coffee. However, since the one shop nearest me (which isn't very near) is 2 blocks from a Peet's, I'll go there. Otherwise, it's the one in the grocery store. I have a choice of at LEAST seven independent coffee places within something like a half mile, I'll survive. I do NOT like manipulation. I do NOT like fakery. This reminds me of those damn cigarettes that were marketed as if they were made by a guy in his back yard.
Anyone want to start a pool on how long this new sad idea will survive?
Fluffnik at 12:59AM on 07/21/09