• Share:
  • Send to Reddit
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Review of the New 'M&M's Premiums': Fancy-Pants, Expensive, and Kinda Gross

20080811-mms.jpg

Do you find M&M's annoyingly lowbrow? You're in luck! Mars has launched a posh line of M&M's called M&M's Premiums that they hope will "attract a young, fashion-conscious consumer to the product," the New York Times reports. The candies will even make an appearance at New York Fashion Week in September.

These novel M&M's bear scant resemblance to the originals. They are made from an entirely different chocolate recipe and sport a speckled metallic skin instead of the famous uniform-colored M&M candy shell. That means there's no crunch, just an exterior sheen.

20080811-mms-boxes.jpg

They come in five flavors—mint chocolate, mocha, triple chocolate, raspberry almond, and chocolate almond. We tried mint chocolate ("sinfully good white chocolate mint wrapped in dark chocolate") and triple chocolate ("truly tempting layers of milk chocolate, white chocolate and dark chocolate").

20080811-mms-innards.jpg

Inside a mint chocolate M&M and a triple M&M.

Truly tempting they are not. The newfangled candy has an unappealingly viscous mouthfeel and none of that lovely crunch that make original M&M's so fun to eat. They are also cloyingly sweet and completely one-dimensional in flavor.

The quality of the chocolate is too lackluster to warrant its "premium" label and price—a six-ounce package of upscale M&M's costs $3.99, or more than $10 a pound. For that price, I want damn good chocolate. Instead, I got cheap Easter candy-quality chocolate.

Will you try them? Have you already?

Previously

Indiana Jones Crisp-Mint M&Ms: Meh

32 Comments:

Yep, tried the raspberry almond. Very fake raspberry flavor, mushy/chewy chocolate texture AND (horror of horrors) they VERY EASILY melt in your hand!!! I still ate them, because I'll eat almost any chocolate, but they were a real let-down.

The lack of crispy shell (which was a shock to my mouth, by the way) is why I'll never buy these again.

Ew. Raspberry almond sounds gross, but I don't like faux raspberry flavor in ANYTHING so I'm not the target market.

They truly look like mistakes. I'm not interested. I'll take the crunchy shell, please.

Don't forget to check out the insanely gross nutritional facts as well! It's about 1000 per package, I believe.

Well, I won't be buyng any now.

Who actually thought it would be a good idea to get rid of the shell? Was there no market-testing of these things at all?

They look like someone left them in the pocket of their jeans then ran them through the washing machine.

I'd try them if someone else offered them to me. But no crunch? Booo!

wow, too bad they're gross. but you've just proven that photos do lie, then. because your photo of the candies at the top is AMAZING! wow! i just want to make that my desktop wallpaper!

No! The one and only point of M&Ms - peanut - is to consume as many as possible in the pursuit of trying to extract an intact nut from the crunchy coating. And again, and again... :)

I'm quite glad to see this, I saw these at the store this weekend and had considered picking some up next week. I'll be skipping them now :-)

I liked them quite a bit. I though that the Mocha was the best, but mostly because there are no other easy-to-find Mocha lentils, so it satisfies a gaping hole in my candy repertoire.

Mint was second on my list, the coolness of it and the creaminess, also better ingredients than Andes Mints (which uses hydrogenated oils instead of cocoa butter) ... the others were okay (but I detested the raspberry).

I think the metallic coating is a bit of overkill (they look like eyeshadow samples to me) but I grant that they look different from other M&Ms so there's no confusing them.

I didn't miss the shell, but I wasn't expecting a shell.

I didn't taste any mocha at all, and I would eat the Triples if someone gave them to me, but I wouldn't pay for them again, or bother trying the others.

I was intrigued after reading the review on Candy Blog, and my local Target had them on sale, so I picked up the Triple Chocolate and the Mocha varieties. The mocha wasn't too bad -- while the chocolate was bland and the consistency disturbing (no hard shell? what's the point?), there was a hint of mocha that I enjoyed. Triple chocolate, on the other hand, was simply terrible. It was LESS flavorful than the normal M&Ms, and although the jewel-inspired coating is pretty, its waxy film is almost nauseating. Not only will I not buy them again, I'll use what's left in my boxes to warn others before they sink the cost.

One last note: My dog watched my husband eating a handful of these last night, and actually barked EACH TIME he lifted on to his mouth. I think it was her attempt at a warning.

I like M&M's as they are and have always been and think of them as classic rather than lowbrow. The crunchy coating is part of their understated charm. :)

Target was sampling them one Saturday and we tried the triple chocolate. We had the same reaction. "Where's the crispy shell?" and "Chocolate chips taste better than this."

I feel that if they wanted to market to "young, fashion-conscious consumers" they would just start selling bags containing only one color. That way they can just get their favorite color.

Just make sure not to accidentally mix one wrong one in:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgR-l3fhygw

Pfffffft. M&Ms already reached their apex with the dark chocolate + almond version.

I thought that the triple chocolate ones were not too horrible. They looked nice, and they were (I thought) a bit better than a plain M&M, but not worth the extra money.

What a GREAT idea...being able to purchase a whole bag of your favorite color of M&M's, why aren't you doing marketing for Mars? :)
I was going to purchase these new "designer" candies and opted not to because I thought my kids would not be at all to happy with the "adult" flavors, and after reading these comments I am all to happy I stuck with the classic!

You can order M&M colors to order...just click the link on the main M&M site. OR, more fun, go to the M&M factory/showroom in Vegas.

I add my vote to the Yucky column. I purchased these and was very disappointed in the lack of the candy coating. And the amount of coloring used to make the outer shell look so fancy tastes nasty. As someone already mentioned it is waxy, but it also has a distinct "coloring" taste like you get if you put too much food coloring in frosting or something.

I am kind of amazed at how bad of a miss this product is coming from such a major company.

I'm not much of a chocolate fan but I do enjoy M&Ms. These look strange and after reading all the comments, I won't even waste my money or my chewing time on these lol.

I love iridescence on some things. Dunno about food.

That's too bad that these were gross. I *really* enjoy the regular, nonposh versions of cherry M&Ms, as well as the mint chocolate M&Ms. Figured the raspberry ones would be just as good, if not better. :(

Where doi= cherry M&Ms conme from Cassaendra? I assume it is not just that they are red. I love cherry flavor usually. Although today I sampled some cherry tea from the new tea store in the mall and it really did taste like that childhood medicine my mother gave me - nasty.

I am very much a chocolate snob, and I have this to say, M&Ms, plain, or peanut butter, are some of the very few "cheap chocolates" I will eat. I find them to be quite simple, delightful, and not too sweet. When I heard of this new "Premium M&M" I was very excited.. now I am very disappointed to see that they are disliked so much. I have not tried them but The shell was deff overkill.
I believe Mars made a large blunder with all the white chocolate. Most are looking more towards dark chocolate because of the health benefits and it's not as sweet. They should have done different levels of dark chocolate, made them less sweet, I would have eaten some of these, but I don't like white chocolate, it must be a very high quality for me to even try it.
I don't think M&M's should give up on this. They should give it another try, or make different flavors.

I really like the raspberry almond ones & I frankly didn't notice there wasn't any shell. They are fun and different & I don't expect them to be like regular m & m's just because they are made by the same company.

that's like the stupidest thing i've ever heard of, M&Ms for fashion conscious people, WTF??? most fashion conscious people don't even eat chocolate or anything else that has more than 10 calories!

They're M&Ms not a car! how can a candy be "low-brow" that doesn't even make any sense!

you guys are crazy these new M&M's are awesome! I especially like the minty ones. Better than Andes!

I thought the mocha ones were pretty tasty, but like many others; I was also expecting the candy shell. You can buy them at Walmart for $2.00, not the $3.99 suggested retail price...

i just bought the M&M premium chocolate almond candies and i have to say they are better then a hershys chocolate bar with almonds.
you get a full almond in every one and they are sooooooooo very addicting.
now if they would only bring back the WHITE CHOCOLATE M&Ms back!!!!!!

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.