• Share:
  • Send to Reddit
  • Send to StumbleUpon
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to del.icio.us
  • Send to digg

Celebrity Chef Has Pants on Fire

irivne.jpgThe St. Petersburg Times reports that celebrity chef Robert Irvine, of the Food Network program Dinner: Impossible, may have stretched his resume a bit. The paper details how Irvine, in trying to hustle up funds to open two restaurants in St. Petersburg, Florida, fabricated stories about being a knight, owning a castle in Scotland, and having cooked for presidents and royalty. [via Gawker]

21 Comments:

They call him a massive liar - that's pretty strong for stretching his resume. Bravado is his schtick. He is an excellent cook they all say, but how does that make him a successful restaurant owner, or should I say restaurants, plural? As often happens, he believed his own lies and hype. Maybe Gordon Ramsey can step in and get him up to speed. Personally, I still like the guy, but prefer the truth be told.

No doubt they're calling him a massive liar in part because they probably feel really foolish. My first thought was '... no one CHECKED?! They just swallowed what he said, no casual questioning... NOTHING?'. This was followed by 'How come he didn't bluff himself back OUT of the mess, by just grinning and saying, "I was just kidding I cannot believe you swallowed all that rubbish!"'.
Still, it does go to show that skill alone generally gets you absolutely nowhere.

Terrible, terrible, terrible. I've lost all respect for him.

I liken the terms cook and chef to medic and medical doctor. They each have skills and abilities, but one has the educational credentials to earn the more respected title. There has been much discussion about tv chefs vs. cooks. Some cooks even have their own restaurants, but do not refer to themselves as chef, because they are not culinary school graduates. Most will agree that their expertise is lacking compared to their better educated counterparts.

I've never attended culinary school, but I would think they offer business classes for those who might want to someday own or manage a restaurant. The necessary skills are not even related to cooking a great meal. The article only talked about his cooking talent. If I were an investor, I'd want to know where the business acumen was coming from.

It does irk me that he calls himself an Executive Chef and all the other titles he has bestowed upon himself. Putting on airs is phony and just plain dishonest.

This is not the first time that the almighty Food Network didn't check someone's background and they should be embarrassed. I watched a few of the Dinner: Impossible shows in the first season, but the novelty wore off quickly. I fail to see why the show is so popular, but maybe this little expose will cause FN to rethink their choice on this one, especially since he now seems to be one of the network's most prominent figures, appearing on Iron Chef and seasonal specials, etc. Talented chef/cook or not, don't lie about how you got there. What a joke.

Whether he is exactly what he claimed to be or not, his show is a hit and we watch it every chance we get. He seems to accomplish a great deal in the challenges he is faced with, and feeds a lot of people food which they enjoy. So what if he stretched the truth a bit on his resume. Don't most people do the same?

@amy............he has stolen hundreds of thousands of dollars from his investors and people he employed to prepare his two restaurants, which do not appear to be anywhere near ready to open. I agree, he has charisma and I've enjoyed his program, but I sure don't want him owing me that kind of money. He got where he is by lying, cheating and stealing, period.

"amy: So what if he stretched the truth a bit on his resume. Don't most people do the same?"

@amy . . . . ah, no? He didn't stretch the truth. He totally made things up. This is what happens when a person lies on their resume. They get caught and embarrassed, not to mention possibly fired. I can't believe his outrageous statements didn't raise any red flags.

While we occasionally watch his show, I always thought there was something a little off-putting about him. Maybe this is what were sensing...

Perkymac: The only reason he calls himself "Executive Chef" is b/c HE HAS BEEN AN EXEC. CHEF FOR MANY HOTELS/ RESORTS Including Donald Trump's Taj Majal.

Look- yes he did stretch the truth regarding a couple things in his past but let's not forget all that he has accomplished. He HAS cooked for several Presidents and he has been an Exec. Chef for many prestigeous Hotels and Resorts and he HAS cooked for Royalty.

And PERKY MAC- You are only getting ONE side of this story as far as Robert Irvine "Steeling" hundreds of thousands of dollars (which isn't the case- trust me).. This Socialite woman LaTorre practically owns St.Pettersburgh and has an axe to grind- she bought & paid for the article. This is a one sided story and is unfair. Are you really going to believe everything you read?? I can verify that SEVERAL "facts" in this article are FALSE, so maybe this fact checker hasn't done their best?

Let me elaborate: a) Robert Irvine doesn't live where they say he does and B) Dinner: Impossible is not in it's 2nd Season.. who's to say they are incorrect about other things mentioned in their article?

PerkyMac, Chef is not the title for a graduate of culinary school. It is a job title, the title for someone who is in charge of the day-to-day operation of a high-level professional kitchen. Executive Chef is a job title, usually for the chief chef of a large kitchen or multi-kitchen operation who has multiple chefs working under him (either chefs de parti or chefs of various shifts). They are also professional certifications handed out by various national professional associations, such as the America Culinary Federation here in the US. It is perfectly possible to apprentice in order to gain the skills to hold these positions and certifications rather than go to culinary school, and many fine chefs have done so and will continue to do so all over the world. In addition, a graduate of culinary school does not automatically become a chef.
Please stop promulgating the misconception that a chef is a culinary school graduate. A chef is someone who does the job of a chef.

Okay. I just can't tolerate pompous people who wear titles they don't deserve.

I, for one, do not really care for his show. He makes the smallest minor setbacks into earth-shattering crises. Too melodramatic.

I've never liked his show, either - I agree that it's too melodramatic. As far as the story goes, how is it one-sided? The paper talked to Irvine himself, who had little to say about his "knighthood" and other ridiculous lies. People believed him because he's a celebrity but apparently he thinks that means he can do - and say - whatever he wants and get away with it.

The Food Network has removed his bio from their site and issued this statement:

"It's unfortunate if Robert embellished the extent of his culinary experiences. We are investigating the matter and taking the necessary steps to ensure the accuracy of all representations of Robert on Food Network and foodnetwork.com."

Perky, if he holds a CEC from the ACF, something the article does not dispute, then Executive Chef is a title he deserves. I've got nothing to say about his knighthood, though.

This is totally unrelated to food, but medics and doctors do not have the same skills and the difference is that one has gone to school. The difference goes far beyond getting a medical degree.

I never liked his show. The times I've seen his show. He sometimes seems to make pretty simple stuff...out of the need to make a huge amount. It's not necessarily good food. He seems a little two faced. He often unreasonably yells at his staff...then later in front of the crowd of diners, he acts totally different. I suppose it might be what an executive chef needs to do to get the job done. But he just seems way too angry to me.

I've never watched the show so I don't know who the heck he is but, in general, melodrama, anger, and whiny drivel are what sells on tv. If it's anything like that really idiotic show, Hell's Kitchen - no thanks. I hate *all* reality shows because of this. People obviously don't have enough of it going on in real life.

It seems to me "The Foolish Network" should have checked on "Sir" Roberts' knighthood in the first place and then they wouldn't have to be checking on it now. Just goes to show the dumbing down of "The Foolish Network" is a reality. Whatta ya say to that Brooke Johnson?!

I like the guy, the guy was pretty interesting. My wife enjoyed his cooking. It just shows that, the producers and management at food network are just bunch of retard. Come on now this is the second time they screwed up. First was with Anthony Bourdain who has a hit show on travel channel. They got rid of him and he went to another show and got nominated for his show. Now their running his old shows because they knew they screwed up. The people at food network should atlest, let the his contract end and don't renew so there wouldn't be a big controversy over his resume. Second they should went out and check out all the people he use to work for. All the employer's do back ground check, why didn't they simply do a background check on someone. That's just plain common sense. It shows to all of us that who ever is running the food network are just bunch of retarted CEO'S and producers of the shows. There were shows in the past that were good and now there gone. CAN'T ANYONE AT THAT FOOD NETWORK GET IT RIGHT!!!!!! THEY THEM SELF SHOULD GET FIRED ASWELL.

Add a comment:

Comments can take up to a minute to appear - please be patient!

Previewing your comment:

 

HTML Hints

Some HTML is OK: <a href="URL">link</a>, <strong>strong</strong>, <em>em</em>

Comment Guidelines

Post whatever you want, just keep it seriously about eats, seriously. We reserve the right to delete off-topic or inflammatory comments. Learn more at our Comment Policy page.

If you see something not so nice, please, report an inappropriate comment.